Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15279

Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question

Show all headers | View raw

Robert Baer wrote:
> Evertjan. wrote:
>> Robert Baer wrote on 05 aug 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>>> Out of context code snippet first:
>>> ** QUOTE **
>>> <div class="clear"></div>
>>> <div class="slider">
>>> <div class="flexslider">
>>> <ul class="slides">
>>> <li class="sl1">
>>> <!--[if lt IE 11]>
>>> <img src="images/SLIDER1.JPG" alt="Codatron&trade;">
>>> <![else]
>>> <img src="images/Codatron.png" alt="Codatron&trade;">
>>> <![endif]-->
>>> <div class="caption">
>>> <div class="text1"></div>
>>> <div class="text2">Codatron&trade; Regulator</div>
>>> <p>Our regulator is so quiet that the charge amplifiers used
>>> with the photomultipliers need no shielding during bench testing.</p>
>>> <a href="index-3.html">Read More</a>
>>> </div>
>>> </li>
>>> <!--[if lt IE 11]>
>>> <li class="sl2">
>>> <img src="images/SLIDER2.JPG" alt="RoHS">
>>> <div class="caption">
>>> <div class="text1">Reduction of</div>
>>> <div class="text2">Hazardous Substances</div>
>>> <p>All of our high voltage regulators were
>>> ** END QUOTE **
>>> If i edit out all of the IF..ENDIF code and use only one of the<img
>>> src="images/etc lines, it "works" reasonably well.
>>> That is to say most browsers more-or-less renders the code as on
>>> might like (am ignoring that the width goes from the desired 800DPI to
>>> as much as 1000DPI and shuffles image and text blocks around).
>>> Q:
>>> Why does that added code alter how the browser renders things (by
>>> hiding the top image and related text)?
>>
>> Wrong NG.
>>
>> This NH is about Javascript, both in browsers and in other places, like
>> servers, editors, cscript, wscript.
>>
>> This NG is not about html and the way you use that in specific browsers.
>>
>> BTW, if you think yours is a "Stupid Question" why ask? I don't think
>> this or any Q is stupid, this one is just off topic, so better search for
>> a more apropriate NG.
>>
>> BTW2, the subject line in Usenet should be used to clearly identify your
>> Q, not to air your frustrations on the quality of such Q.
>>
>>
> So, if i interpret your answer correctly, those IF..ENDIF statements are
> NOT javascript.
> May i then correctly assume that they are HTML?
>
   Could not find any active NG covering HTML..suggestions?

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:32 -0700
  off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-05 06:33 +0000
    Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-05 21:31 -0700
      Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-05 21:56 -0700
        Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 09:21 +0200
          Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-06 01:44 -0700
            Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 13:29 +0200
              Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-06 11:01 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 21:03 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-06 20:12 +0100
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 21:18 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 00:14 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-07 09:28 +0100
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 15:17 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 00:11 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-07 10:06 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-07 13:20 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:38 -0700
      Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 15:56 +0200
  Re: Stupid Question SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 15:51 +0200
    Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:53 -0700
      Re: Stupid Question Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-12 00:34 +0000
        Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-14 16:43 -0700

csiph-web