Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15361

Re: Stupid Question

Date 2012-08-14 16:43 -0700
From Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Stupid Question
References <Ivmdnarpr67AaoDNnZ2dnUVZ_gKdnZ2d@posted.localnet> <5023c079$0$6189$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> <PYmdnaJ2T_f1f7vNnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@posted.localnet> <k06tmc$vbe$2@dont-email.me>
Message-ID <26idnTKw1PBff7fNnZ2dnUVZ_o-dnZ2d@posted.localnet> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Denis McMahon wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:53:26 -0700, Robert Baer wrote:
>
>>>> <!--[if lt IE 11]>
>>>> <img src="images/SLIDER1.JPG" alt="Codatron&trade;">
>>>> <![else]
>>>> <img src="images/Codatron.png" alt="Codatron&trade;">  <![endif]-->
>
>>     Just to be clear on that [if lt IE 11] code snippet, the top part
>> gets "executed" if true (meaning if ANY version of IE is the rendering
>> browser), the bottom part gets "executed" if false (meaning ALL other
>> browsers).
>
> Not strictly true.
>
> Non IE browsers have no reason to pay any attention whatsoever to any of
> the html comment between<!-- and -->
>
> Firefox, for example, just sees a single html comment.
>
> Rgds
>
> Denis McMahon
   Maybe, perhaps; the net result is what counts and that conforms to my 
observations.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:32 -0700
  off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-05 06:33 +0000
    Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-05 21:31 -0700
      Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-05 21:56 -0700
        Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 09:21 +0200
          Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-06 01:44 -0700
            Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 13:29 +0200
              Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-06 11:01 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 21:03 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-06 20:12 +0100
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 21:18 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 00:14 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-07 09:28 +0100
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 15:17 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 00:11 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-07 10:06 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-07 13:20 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:38 -0700
      Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 15:56 +0200
  Re: Stupid Question SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 15:51 +0200
    Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:53 -0700
      Re: Stupid Question Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-12 00:34 +0000
        Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-14 16:43 -0700

csiph-web