Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15291
| Date | 2012-08-07 00:14 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question |
| References | (5 earlier) <NrOdnQsy0Yl6HoLNnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@posted.localnet> <jvo9ri$ehs$1@dont-email.me> <EpudnQjuRZD6m73NnZ2dnUVZ_uadnZ2d@posted.localnet> <jvp4e6$ku5$1@dont-email.me> <timstreater-EE1B38.20125106082012@news.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <N_6dnftXj-KgXb3NnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d@posted.localnet> (permalink) |
Tim Streater wrote: > In article <jvp4e6$ku5$1@dont-email.me>, > Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> wrote: > >> Am 2012-08-06 20:01, Robert Baer meinte: >> > Gregor Kofler wrote: >> >> Am 2012-08-06 10:44, Robert Baer meinte: >> >>> Gregor Kofler wrote: >> >>>> Am 2012-08-06 06:56, Robert Baer meinte: >> >>>>> Robert Baer wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>>>> So, if i interpret your answer correctly, those IF..ENDIF >> statements >> >>>>>> are >> >>>>>> NOT javascript. >> >>>>>> May i then correctly assume that they are HTML? >> >>>> >> >>>> Neither (well, sort of the latter). They are "conditional >> comments"[1]. >> >>>> >> >>>>> Could not find any active NG covering HTML..suggestions? >> >>>> >> >>>> Did (or how did) you search? >> >>>> >> >>>> How about >> >>>> >> >>>> comp.infosystems.www.authoring.html >> >>> * Here we go again; nomenclature. Would never have thought about >> >>> "authoring". >> >> >> >> "html" should suffice. I use Thunderbird as newsreader and when >> >> subscribing to newsgroups I can just search for "html" or >> "javascript" - >> >> no need to know the precise name of a newsgroup. >> >> >> >>> However,using the baby bird (goo-gull) i found Firebug which LOOKS >> >>> like it would do what i want. >> >>> BUT. >> >>> Cannot follow the damn directions as there is NO grey firebug to >> >>> click on. >> >>> Have no clue as to if it actually installed, etc. >> >>> So, at this point it is totally useless. >> >>> Useful comments? >> >> >> >> Dunno. Is Firebug listet under your installed extensions? Have you >> >> restarted FF? Firebug has been working here for years without any >> >> problems. Hit F12 this should also trigger Firebug. Or use >> >> Chrome/Chromium and use the developer tools there - they do a similar >> >> (and in rare occassions better) job as Firebug. >> >> >> >> Gregor >> > OK; the "tricks" of restart and F12 worked. >> > BUT. >> > Absolutely zero instructions or help. >> > I would like to step thru the code and then see what the result is. >> > I noticed that one can have two windows: the site being debugged, and >> > the control window; making it handy to do exactly what i would like >> to do. >> > Firebug site is not exactly helpful to say the least; but for free, >> > what can i expect? >> >> I've used Firebug for years now, I can't remember finding it >> particularly difficult to get grips with it. >> >> Browsing through >> https://getfirebug.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page >> >> should give you more than sufficient help. >> >> For a start >> >> - activate the script tab >> - reload page >> - locate the script in question from the dropdown >> - find code you want to debug > > He doesn't *have* any code. He appears to be largely clueless. > The code is on my website, and that is where i must check out WTF is happening and try, in my abysmal ignorance, figure out what is causing one or more problems. So, keeping that in mind, a) incorrect - have code; b) correct.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:32 -0700
off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-05 06:33 +0000
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-05 21:31 -0700
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-05 21:56 -0700
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 09:21 +0200
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-06 01:44 -0700
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 13:29 +0200
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-06 11:01 -0700
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 21:03 +0200
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-06 20:12 +0100
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 21:18 +0200
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 00:14 -0700
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-07 09:28 +0100
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 15:17 -0700
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 00:11 -0700
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-07 10:06 +0200
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-07 13:20 +0200
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:38 -0700
Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 15:56 +0200
Re: Stupid Question SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 15:51 +0200
Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:53 -0700
Re: Stupid Question Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-12 00:34 +0000
Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-14 16:43 -0700
csiph-web