Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15274

off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question

Show all headers | View raw

Robert Baer wrote on 05 aug 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:

>    Out of context code snippet first:
> ** QUOTE **
>      <div class="clear"></div>
>      <div class="slider">
>       <div class="flexslider">
>        <ul class="slides">
>         <li class="sl1">
> <!--[if lt IE 11]>
>          <img src="images/SLIDER1.JPG" alt="Codatron&trade;">
> <![else]
>          <img src="images/Codatron.png" alt="Codatron&trade;">
> <![endif]-->
>          <div class="caption">
>           <div class="text1"></div>
>           <div class="text2">Codatron&trade; Regulator</div>
>           <p>Our regulator is so quiet that the charge amplifiers used 
> with the photomultipliers need no shielding during bench testing.</p>
>           <a href="index-3.html">Read More</a>
>          </div>
>         </li>
> <!--[if lt IE 11]>
>         <li class="sl2">
>          <img src="images/SLIDER2.JPG" alt="RoHS">
>          <div class="caption">
>           <div class="text1">Reduction of</div>
>           <div class="text2">Hazardous Substances</div>
>           <p>All of our high voltage regulators were
> ** END QUOTE **
>    If i edit out all of the IF..ENDIF code and use only one of the <img 
> src="images/etc lines, it "works" reasonably well.
>    That is to say most browsers more-or-less renders the code as on 
> might like (am ignoring that the width goes from the desired 800DPI to 
> as much as 1000DPI and shuffles image and text blocks around).
>    Q:
>    Why does that added code alter how the browser renders things (by 
> hiding the top image and related text)?

Wrong NG.

This NH is about Javascript, both in browsers and in other places, like 
servers, editors, cscript, wscript.

This NG is not about html and the way you use that in specific browsers.

BTW, if you think yours is a "Stupid Question" why ask? I don't think 
this or any Q is stupid, this one is just off topic, so better search for 
a more apropriate NG. 

BTW2, the subject line in Usenet should be used to clearly identify your 
Q, not to air your frustrations on the quality of such Q.


-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:32 -0700
  off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-05 06:33 +0000
    Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-05 21:31 -0700
      Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-05 21:56 -0700
        Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 09:21 +0200
          Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-06 01:44 -0700
            Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 13:29 +0200
              Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-06 11:01 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 21:03 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-06 20:12 +0100
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-06 21:18 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 00:14 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-08-07 09:28 +0100
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 15:17 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-07 00:11 -0700
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Gregor Kofler <usenet@gregorkofler.com> - 2012-08-07 10:06 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-08-07 13:20 +0200
                Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:38 -0700
      Re: off topic, was: Re: Stupid Question SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 15:56 +0200
  Re: Stupid Question SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 15:51 +0200
    Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:53 -0700
      Re: Stupid Question Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-08-12 00:34 +0000
        Re: Stupid Question Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-14 16:43 -0700

csiph-web