Re: A proposition for a conditional loop.

From	"R.Wieser" <address@not.available>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: A proposition for a conditional loop.
Date	2019-09-29 21:02 +0200
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<qmqv3n$u1u$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <666a154e-9a7b-4a20-8c04-637f3da8983f@googlegroups.com> <qmofh1$1r3m$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e5c08f64-05b7-4c61-8f87-565801783620@googlegroups.com> <qmqmdf$1le4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <306369b3-cdad-4754-843d-8a8e3c697280@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Jonas,

> You do not seem to understand the logic

You still don't get it do you ? I DON'T CARE.  I'm not spending /any/ time 
trying to dig thru whatever humongous code you post in search for any logic 
you might have put in there.  If-and-when there is /any/ logic involved I 
expect YOU to tell us.

> "it says keyreleased"

Where ?   Not in your last code as present in the message I responded to.

> so there will be a event z-+

Good for you.   Just wanted to warn you about the possibility of the code 
(that I was able to see) being picky.

> but as John showed no extra condition and no break needed "even using 
> while".

:-) I think he showed you a bit more.   Where you had two comparisions (one 
for down, one for up) you now have none.

> Yes i proposed a loop logic without negations

No you didn't.   Feel free to point us to where you described that new loop 
and an example of its usage though.   And no, coughing up a few words with 
arrows from one to the other is not any kind of explanation or example. :-\

> While not equal, i simply do not like it i know it is "probably" just
> semantics, but the readability of code suffers from it

That is why you have remarks at your disposal.  When stuff gets hairy you 
can (and should!) always put a discription next to that code.  As I already 
said, use them.

But, I'm signing off.  I've said what I wanted to say.  Lets see if you do 
something with it.

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

Thread

A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 00:55 -0700
  Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:05 -0700
    Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:14 -0700
      Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:16 -0700
        Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 05:12 -0700
  Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-24 22:27 +0200
    Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 22:39 -0700
      Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 09:05 +0200
        Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 02:47 -0700
          Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 13:13 +0200
            Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 05:13 -0700
              Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 15:04 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 06:10 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 15:50 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-25 16:00 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 10:20 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 10:26 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 19:18 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 12:19 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 10:48 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-26 04:38 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 18:05 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-26 10:54 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-27 10:06 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2019-09-27 02:34 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 05:32 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 05:36 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-27 20:23 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 12:45 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-27 22:05 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 14:39 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-28 00:16 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 17:10 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-28 17:28 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-28 11:34 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-28 22:23 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-28 21:42 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 07:40 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-29 18:33 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 09:58 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-29 19:18 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-29 21:02 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 13:54 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-28 10:41 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 13:17 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-27 13:41 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 06:01 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-27 14:03 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-27 19:23 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 12:06 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-28 14:43 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 21:47 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 10:49 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 17:07 +0200

csiph-web