Re: A proposition for a conditional loop.

Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Date	2019-09-24 05:12 -0700
References	<59bee1c7-4afe-445e-8f73-b3248e75040c@googlegroups.com> <140f2d37-4682-433d-91a3-d94ed04e2890@googlegroups.com> <37dacf12-6401-4d3f-944a-2df28b79a53b@googlegroups.com> <5aec3f2e-f0e5-4167-9fb5-042c32a5e6f5@googlegroups.com>
Message-ID	<13b44d81-bfaf-4736-9ddc-16875b60d2d6@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: A proposition for a conditional loop.
From	Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Den måndag 23 september 2019 kl. 10:16:12 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> Den måndag 23 september 2019 kl. 10:14:05 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > Den måndag 23 september 2019 kl. 10:06:00 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > > Den måndag 23 september 2019 kl. 09:55:31 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
> > > > Well this or similar, is probably implemented in some language or  possible done with while and multi conditions?
> > > > 
> > > > But instead of for loops and if clause inside with a break.
> > > > 
> > > > Why not do....
> > > > 
> > > > step=1;
> > > > x="something"
> > > > do until (this equal that) { inc x, step}
> > > > then do { whatever }
> > > > 
> > > > First off no break needed, no separate conditioning from loop?
> > > 
> > > Well maybe (this equal that[x]) would been clearer.
> > 
> > I can see it is prone to infinite loops but so is while also.
> > 
> > I mean doing this with while just not possible it will be a weird statement.
> > 
> > while (this != that[x]){
> > x++;
> > ]
> > 
> > whatever
> > 
> > It is basicly same thing, but does not feel right. Somehow the connection between what is going on in loop and why is lost to the thing "whatever" you want to do.
> 
> I think the connection between syntax to semantics get lost.

https://techdocs.broadcom.com/content/dam/broadcom/techdocs/us/en/assets/docops/caet/923525.png

Thread

A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 00:55 -0700
  Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:05 -0700
    Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:14 -0700
      Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:16 -0700
        Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 05:12 -0700
  Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-24 22:27 +0200
    Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 22:39 -0700
      Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 09:05 +0200
        Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 02:47 -0700
          Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 13:13 +0200
            Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 05:13 -0700
              Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 15:04 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 06:10 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 15:50 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-25 16:00 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 10:20 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 10:26 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 19:18 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 12:19 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 10:48 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-26 04:38 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 18:05 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-26 10:54 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-27 10:06 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2019-09-27 02:34 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 05:32 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 05:36 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-27 20:23 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 12:45 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-27 22:05 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 14:39 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-28 00:16 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 17:10 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-28 17:28 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-28 11:34 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-28 22:23 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-28 21:42 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 07:40 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-29 18:33 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 09:58 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-29 19:18 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-29 21:02 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 13:54 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-28 10:41 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 13:17 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-27 13:41 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 06:01 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-27 14:03 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-27 19:23 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 12:06 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-28 14:43 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 21:47 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 10:49 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 17:07 +0200

csiph-web