Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #37433

Re: A proposition for a conditional loop.

From Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: A proposition for a conditional loop.
Date 2019-09-27 14:03 +0100
Message-ID <270920191403521779%timstreater@greenbee.net> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <utrpoedg7h1h2f334r8irhkgjqf413cft0@4ax.com> <95dfed9c-f232-43d4-aa54-267e5fa87115@googlegroups.com> <76kroehhtucq3t3v7s7ogtve762f1sf9eo@4ax.com> <aa338903-0be3-4046-bdf0-866919d78d0b@googlegroups.com> <dc9ed013-9388-4f53-b076-00dc344a1a49@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


In article <dc9ed013-9388-4f53-b076-00dc344a1a49@googlegroups.com>,
Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote:

>Den fredag 27 september 2019 kl. 14:32:11 UTC+2 skrev Jonas Thörnvall:
>> Den fredag 27 september 2019 kl. 11:06:07 UTC+2 skrev John G Harris:
>> > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Jonas Thörnvall
>> > <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > 
>> >   <snip>
>> > >No i actually was talking about the inner loops in second and third "main
>> > >condition" of the if else they would benefit from "du until".
>> > >
>> > >They would not need if condition, it would be in the do until loop
>> > >statement.
>> > >Right?
>> > 
>> > After posting more than 10 articles you still haven't shown us an
>> > example of what code you would like to be able to use.
>> > 
>> > Meanwhile, I have given you an example that is simple,
>> > straightforward, and clean. It works unchanged in C, C++, C#, and Java
>> > as well as in all versions of ECMAScript.
>> > 
>> > You would do better to follow my example and stop complaining that
>> > there isn't another way to do it.
>> > 
>> >   John
>>    
>> do until
>> (track[rectrack].midiMess[z].data1==track[rectrack].midiMess[midiEv].data1))
>> {z++;} then {
>>  ctm.fillStyle = "#000a4d";
>> 
>>  ctm.fillRect(scrollBarPos-BACKOFFSET[midiEv]-5,(PistartX+keyHeight*88)-(keyH
>>  eight*(track[rectrack].midiMess[midiEv].data1-8))-1,barLength[midiEv]+50
>>  ,keyHeight+2);
>>  ctm.fillStyle = pcolor[track[rectrack].midiMess[midiEv].data1];
>>  
>>   ctm.fillRect(scrollBarPos-BACKOFFSET[midiEv],(PistartX+keyHeight*88)-(keyHe
>>   ight*(track[rectrack].midiMess[midiEv].data1-8)),
>>   barLength[midiEv]+50,keyHeight);
>> 
>> }
>
>Now you may think that the do until require also less then nmbrOfEv but that
>condition already satisfied. There is guaranteed to be a match. Because of
>the outer conditions.

I don't think anything about it, because it is unreadable. No one is
going to read this rubbish. Try a simple example instead.

-- 
What power have you got?
Where did you get it from?
In whose interests do you use it?
To whom are you accountable?
How do we get rid of you?

Tony Benn

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 00:55 -0700
  Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:05 -0700
    Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:14 -0700
      Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:16 -0700
        Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 05:12 -0700
  Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-24 22:27 +0200
    Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 22:39 -0700
      Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 09:05 +0200
        Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 02:47 -0700
          Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 13:13 +0200
            Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 05:13 -0700
              Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 15:04 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 06:10 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 15:50 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-25 16:00 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 10:20 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 10:26 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 19:18 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 12:19 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 10:48 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-26 04:38 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 18:05 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-26 10:54 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-27 10:06 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2019-09-27 02:34 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 05:32 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 05:36 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-27 20:23 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 12:45 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-27 22:05 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 14:39 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-28 00:16 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 17:10 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-28 17:28 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-28 11:34 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-28 22:23 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-28 21:42 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 07:40 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-29 18:33 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 09:58 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-29 19:18 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-29 21:02 +0200
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 13:54 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-28 10:41 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 13:17 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-27 13:41 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 06:01 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-27 14:03 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-27 19:23 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 12:06 -0700
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-28 14:43 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 21:47 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 10:49 +0100
                Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 17:07 +0200

csiph-web