Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #37379
| From | "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. |
| Date | 2019-09-25 15:04 +0200 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <qmfokj$6u6$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <58927a8f-1d2c-40fe-b198-e7ecb586d141@googlegroups.com> <qmf3jo$11dm$1@gioia.aioe.org> <c5305459-cbee-4c13-837d-3596efcf0517@googlegroups.com> <qmfi5v$17i4$1@gioia.aioe.org> <8cb6e06e-8e1b-41e1-94df-436d86a91437@googlegroups.com> |
Jonas,
> No it is not a proposition within JS it is a proposition for loops that do
> not use negations.
You are again making no sense there. /Loops/ do not use negations,
/conditions/ do. In other words: You already have what you ask for (you
/can/ use negations, but you do not /have/ to).
Than again, you /might/ just mean something different by it than inverting a
conditions result. The problem is that you still have not explained how
/you/ are using that "negations" word (which place it actually has in your
"proposition")
> do until is not part of JS from what i know
Is /that/ the problem ? You needing a "do until" loop ? Thats /all/ ?
And you could not actually say that until I demanded you did ? WTF!
Look here : https://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_dowhile.asp , and
especially the first sentence after the (big) word "Example". I found it
by plugging "javascript do until loop" into google, where it was the first
result.
> and a statement, then {}
That does not make any sense to me. And with the lack of (explicitily asked
for!) example I can't make heads-or-tails from it.
Regards,
Rudy Wieser
P.s.
Drop the top posting. I already know what my own message was - I wrote it
myself - and have no need to scroll thru it to get at what you wanted to
reply to it. If you /have/ to than top post. But preferrably quote just
the relevant parts and delete the rest.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 00:55 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:05 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:14 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-23 01:16 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 05:12 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-24 22:27 +0200
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-24 22:39 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 09:05 +0200
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 02:47 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 13:13 +0200
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 05:13 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 15:04 +0200
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 06:10 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 15:50 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-25 16:00 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 10:20 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 10:26 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 19:18 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-25 12:19 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 10:48 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-26 04:38 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 18:05 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-26 10:54 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-27 10:06 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. dr.j.r.stockton@gmail.com - 2019-09-27 02:34 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 05:32 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 05:36 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-27 20:23 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 12:45 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-27 22:05 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 14:39 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2019-09-28 00:16 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 17:10 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-28 17:28 +0200
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-28 11:34 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-28 22:23 +0200
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-28 21:42 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 07:40 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-29 18:33 +0200
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 09:58 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-29 19:18 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-29 21:02 +0200
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-29 13:54 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-28 10:41 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 13:17 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-27 13:41 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 06:01 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2019-09-27 14:03 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-27 19:23 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. Jonas Thörnvall <jonas.thornvall@gmail.com> - 2019-09-27 12:06 -0700
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-28 14:43 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-25 21:47 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. John G Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2019-09-26 10:49 +0100
Re: A proposition for a conditional loop. "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2019-09-25 17:07 +0200
csiph-web