Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15270
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.posted.localnet!news.posted.localnet.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sat, 04 Aug 2012 23:10:53 -0500 |
| Date | Sat, 04 Aug 2012 21:10:51 -0700 |
| From | Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.0; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120208 Firefox/10.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.7.1 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Sequential JPGs? |
| References | <TbCdncZaMuiorY_NnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@posted.localnet> <XnsA09D5BC07E46eejj99@194.109.133.133> <pfadnV4pd9kRwY7NnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@posted.localnet> <XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133> <4$$RGBTSjZFQFwnm@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <XnsA0A067FC8BD34eejj99@194.109.133.133> |
| In-Reply-To | <XnsA0A067FC8BD34eejj99@194.109.133.133> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Message-ID | <ou2dnTWTSrnQb4DNnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@posted.localnet> (permalink) |
| Lines | 38 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 67.168.185.228 |
| X-Trace | sv3-kPG6gwFFZzd7YzRHxTAET+YKnEBEuLVvK8YTBOFimeNVmUBsOgL+Kb68EOetEezbb/LWiKoSZ50MxTR!IAjigMcKrjXw5BaovNLlFZZBk72uBRkRMrorR2WMuiCVlO14KGmGyoCNeKn8gUN3FeOnz/dcYoek!3mO/GYCOsuo/kdduarv8EE2Nl/n3eae2 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@localnet.com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To | abuse@localnet.com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 2763 |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:15270 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Evertjan. wrote: > Dr J R Stockton wrote on 29 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript: > >> In comp.lang.javascript message<XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133> >> , Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:22:39, Evertjan.<exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> >> posted: >> >>> Robert Baer wrote on 28 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript: >> >>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+slideshow> >>> >>> 273.000.000 hits. >>> >>> Be welcome to come back if there are no hints in any of these. >> >> >> Not a helpful attitude. > > Indeed, John, but a NG is not a paid or unpaid helpdesk. > >> It is the quality of the hits that matters, not >> the mere quantity. > > Not if the OP states: > "I have done some searching and have found no examples." > > Pointing out that there are 273 hits should inform the OP that he did not > even did "some searching". That might be helpful in itself. > >> One gets better results, on the average, with >> <https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=javascript+merlyn+slideshow>. > > Not to diminish your wide expertise, sorcerer John-Merlyn, but it is more > helpful to learn a sorcerer apprentice to view the total availability when > searching, and let him make his one mistakes. > Discovered i was using the wrong terminology for the search.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-26 23:07 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-27 07:01 +0000
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-27 20:29 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-28 07:22 +0000
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-29 00:57 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-29 08:23 +0000
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:00 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-09 17:12 +0200
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-09 18:51 +0000
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Eric Bednarz" <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-08-11 02:37 +0200
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-11 07:39 +0000
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 16:01 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:58 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 16:01 +0200
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:56 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-29 21:10 +0100
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-30 08:13 +0000
Re: Sequential JPGs? Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2012-07-30 11:48 +0000
Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1231@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-07-31 19:45 +0100
Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-31 17:55 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-01 07:04 +0000
Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-01 10:53 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:18 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:10 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:09 -0700
Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1232@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:37 +0100
Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-28 19:22 +0100
Re: Sequential JPGs? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-07-30 08:24 -0700
csiph-web