Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15197 > unrolled thread

Sequential JPGs?

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-26 23:07 -0700
    Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-27 07:01 +0000
      Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-27 20:29 -0700
        Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-28 07:22 +0000
          Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-29 00:57 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-29 08:23 +0000
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:00 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-09 17:12 +0200
                  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-09 18:51 +0000
                    Re: Sequential JPGs? "Eric Bednarz" <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-08-11 02:37 +0200
                      Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-11 07:39 +0000
                      Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 16:01 -0700
                  Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:58 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 16:01 +0200
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:56 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-29 21:10 +0100
            Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-30 08:13 +0000
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2012-07-30 11:48 +0000
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1231@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-07-31 19:45 +0100
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-31 17:55 -0700
                  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-01 07:04 +0000
                    Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-01 10:53 -0700
                    Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:18 -0700
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:10 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:09 -0700
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1232@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:37 +0100
    Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-28 19:22 +0100
    Re: Sequential JPGs? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-07-30 08:24 -0700

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#15249

Gene Wirchenko wrote on 01 aug 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:

> Vocabulary is a big issue.  If you do not know that something
> exists or what it is called, it is hard to search the Web for it.
> Getting that vocabulary from those who already know can be a big help.

You both seem to forget [and I hate to admit this] I helped the OP to the 
search-word "slideshow", opening an multimillion web presense answering his 
OQ.

And I repeat, a NG is not a paid or unpaid helpdesk. This in the sense that 
OP should not claim the right to an answer within stipulated confines of 
their Q. 

Helping by [just] providing or worse "recommending a script" [Q in an 
unrelated posting here], even if legitimate, is something that should be 
kept out of this NG. 

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15252

On 01 Aug 2012 07:04:23 GMT, "Evertjan."
<exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> wrote:

>Gene Wirchenko wrote on 01 aug 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> Vocabulary is a big issue.  If you do not know that something
>> exists or what it is called, it is hard to search the Web for it.
>> Getting that vocabulary from those who already know can be a big help.
>
>You both seem to forget [and I hate to admit this] I helped the OP to the 
>search-word "slideshow", opening an multimillion web presense answering his 
>OQ.

     I was writing in general.

>And I repeat, a NG is not a paid or unpaid helpdesk. This in the sense that 
>OP should not claim the right to an answer within stipulated confines of 
>their Q. 

     Sure, there is no right.  Our pay is different.  We help
colleagues so that we can expect to get help ourselves at other times.

>Helping by [just] providing or worse "recommending a script" [Q in an 
>unrelated posting here], even if legitimate, is something that should be 
>kept out of this NG. 

     I do not know what you mean by "recommending a script" so I can
not reply to this.

Sincerely,

Gene Wirchenko

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15271

Evertjan. wrote:
> Gene Wirchenko wrote on 01 aug 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> Vocabulary is a big issue.  If you do not know that something
>> exists or what it is called, it is hard to search the Web for it.
>> Getting that vocabulary from those who already know can be a big help.
>
> You both seem to forget [and I hate to admit this] I helped the OP to the
> search-word "slideshow", opening an multimillion web presense answering his
> OQ.
>
> And I repeat, a NG is not a paid or unpaid helpdesk. This in the sense that
> OP should not claim the right to an answer within stipulated confines of
> their Q.
>
> Helping by [just] providing or worse "recommending a script" [Q in an
> unrelated posting here], even if legitimate, is something that should be
> kept out of this NG.
>
   Check; it is all about (correct) terminology.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15270

Evertjan. wrote:
> Dr J R Stockton wrote on 29 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> In comp.lang.javascript message<XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133>
>> , Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:22:39, Evertjan.<exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
>> posted:
>>
>>> Robert Baer wrote on 28 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+slideshow>
>>>
>>> 273.000.000 hits.
>>>
>>> Be welcome to come back if there are no hints in any of these.
>>
>>
>> Not a helpful attitude.
>
> Indeed, John, but a NG is not a paid or unpaid helpdesk.
>
>> It is the quality of the hits that matters, not
>> the mere quantity.
>
> Not if the OP states:
> "I have done some searching and have found no examples."
>
> Pointing out that there are 273 hits should inform the OP that he did not
> even did "some searching". That might be helpful in itself.
>
>> One gets better results, on the average, with
>> <https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=javascript+merlyn+slideshow>.
>
> Not to diminish your wide expertise, sorcerer John-Merlyn, but it is more
> helpful to learn a sorcerer apprentice to view the total availability when
> searching, and let him make his one mistakes.
>
   Discovered i was using the wrong terminology for the search.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15269

Dr J R Stockton wrote:
> In comp.lang.javascript message<XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133>
> , Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:22:39, Evertjan.<exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
> posted:
>
>> Robert Baer wrote on 28 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+slideshow>
>>
>> 273.000.000 hits.
>>
>> Be welcome to come back if there are no hints in any of these.
>
>
> Not a helpful attitude.  It is the quality of the hits that matters, not
> the mere quantity.
>
> One gets better results, on the average, with
> <https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=javascript+merlyn+slideshow>.
>
   Boy, that site is really crappy!
   1) black on dark violet is not exactly easy to read, close to Y-rated 
= = not fit even for adults.
   2) just try to enter ANY text; spaces "escape" out and one has to 
fiddle around to bet back for text entry; for the shits.

   Since it was anti-user, i went no further.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15288

In comp.lang.javascript message <ou2dnTqTSrmUb4DNnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@posted
.localnet>, Sat, 4 Aug 2012 21:09:42, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@localnet.com> posted:

>Dr J R Stockton wrote:
>> In comp.lang.javascript message<XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133>
>> , Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:22:39, Evertjan.<exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
>> posted:
>>
>>> Robert Baer wrote on 28 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+slideshow>
>>>
>>> 273.000.000 hits.
>>>
>>> Be welcome to come back if there are no hints in any of these.
>>
>>
>> Not a helpful attitude.  It is the quality of the hits that matters, not
>> the mere quantity.
>>
>> One gets better results, on the average, with
>> <https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=javascript+merlyn+slideshow>.
>>
>  Boy, that site is really crappy!
>  1) black on dark violet is not exactly easy to read, close to Y-rated
>= = not fit even for adults.
>  2) just try to enter ANY text; spaces "escape" out and one has to
>fiddle around to bet back for text entry; for the shits.
>
>  Since it was anti-user, i went no further.

Which site?  Please read your articles two or three times before you
post them, to see whether they make sense.  Others are likely to try
only once.

If you mean the first site that I find listed
(gallery.azusablooms.com/...), please remember that
(1) The order in which Google lists sites can depend on all sorts of
    things,
(2) One should not look only at the first site listed,
(3) I wrote "on the average".


-- 
 (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK.    ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk     Turnpike v6.05.
 Website  <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
 PAS EXE etc. : <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/> - see in 00index.htm
 Dates - miscdate.htm estrdate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15209

In comp.lang.javascript message <TbCdncZaMuiorY_NnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@posted
.localnet>, Thu, 26 Jul 2012 23:07:45, Robert Baer
<robertbaer@localnet.com> posted:


>  How does one go about showing a sequence of JPG pictures with a timed
>interval, then repeating "forever" (at least as long as one is on that
>page)?

In the same way as is commonly used for clocks, in cases where the
digits are not characters but graphics.  Consider, for example,

        <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-anclk.htm#Dig>.

You may need View Source to see Body onload and to find function
SetDial().



TO ALL : My Web site may move.  If so, a search for both Mer1yn and
JavaSkript (with two typos corrected) should find it easily enough, once
the search engine has noticed its new location.

TO ALL: Safari 6 is defenestrated.

-- 
 (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK.    ?@merlyn.demon.co.uk     Turnpike v6.05.
 Website  <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> - w. FAQish topics, links, acronyms
 PAS EXE etc. : <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/programs/> - see in 00index.htm
 Dates - miscdate.htm estrdate.htm js-dates.htm pas-time.htm critdate.htm etc.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15236

On Friday, July 27, 2012 1:07:45 AM UTC-5, Robert Baer wrote:
> Call me ignorant.
> 
>    How does one go about showing a sequence of JPG pictures with a timed 
> 
> interval, then repeating "forever" (at least as long as one is on that 
> 
> page)?

Here is an example on a quick site I did a little while ago:

<http://ht2012.org>

The relevant code:

<http://ht2012.org/template/slideshow.js>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web