Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15270

Re: Sequential JPGs?

Date 2012-08-04 21:10 -0700
From Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Sequential JPGs?
References (1 earlier) <XnsA09D5BC07E46eejj99@194.109.133.133> <pfadnV4pd9kRwY7NnZ2dnUVZ_oadnZ2d@posted.localnet> <XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133> <4$$RGBTSjZFQFwnm@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <XnsA0A067FC8BD34eejj99@194.109.133.133>
Message-ID <ou2dnTWTSrnQb4DNnZ2dnUVZ_hadnZ2d@posted.localnet> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Evertjan. wrote:
> Dr J R Stockton wrote on 29 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> In comp.lang.javascript message<XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133>
>> , Sat, 28 Jul 2012 07:22:39, Evertjan.<exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
>> posted:
>>
>>> Robert Baer wrote on 28 jul 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=javascript+slideshow>
>>>
>>> 273.000.000 hits.
>>>
>>> Be welcome to come back if there are no hints in any of these.
>>
>>
>> Not a helpful attitude.
>
> Indeed, John, but a NG is not a paid or unpaid helpdesk.
>
>> It is the quality of the hits that matters, not
>> the mere quantity.
>
> Not if the OP states:
> "I have done some searching and have found no examples."
>
> Pointing out that there are 273 hits should inform the OP that he did not
> even did "some searching". That might be helpful in itself.
>
>> One gets better results, on the average, with
>> <https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=javascript+merlyn+slideshow>.
>
> Not to diminish your wide expertise, sorcerer John-Merlyn, but it is more
> helpful to learn a sorcerer apprentice to view the total availability when
> searching, and let him make his one mistakes.
>
   Discovered i was using the wrong terminology for the search.

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-26 23:07 -0700
  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-27 07:01 +0000
    Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-27 20:29 -0700
      Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-28 07:22 +0000
        Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-29 00:57 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-29 08:23 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:00 -0700
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-09 17:12 +0200
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-09 18:51 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Eric Bednarz" <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-08-11 02:37 +0200
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-11 07:39 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 16:01 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:58 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 16:01 +0200
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:56 -0700
        Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-29 21:10 +0100
          Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-30 08:13 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2012-07-30 11:48 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1231@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-07-31 19:45 +0100
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-31 17:55 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-01 07:04 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-01 10:53 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:18 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:10 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:09 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1232@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:37 +0100
  Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-28 19:22 +0100
  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-07-30 08:24 -0700

csiph-web