Re: Sequential JPGs?

Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: Sequential JPGs?
From	"Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
References	(3 earlier) <XnsA09E5F61FA229eejj99@194.109.133.133> <scednQJXVc15cYnNnZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@posted.localnet> <XnsA09F69B3A123Eeejj99@194.109.133.133> <3NCdnYRvxZ5ScoDNnZ2dnUVZ_q-dnZ2d@posted.localnet> <k00k1e$o9e$1@news.albasani.net>
Message-ID	<XnsA0AAD4123ADACeejj99@194.109.133.133> (permalink)
Date	2012-08-09 18:51 +0000

Show all headers | View raw

Stefan Weiss wrote on 09 aug 2012 in comp.lang.javascript:

> Some people like to use obscure acronyms. It gives them a feeling of
> superiority when others can't figure out what they mean.

What nonsense, how would you know?

Did you do research on the subject, or are you trying to explain that not 
figuring out what another means gives you an inferiority complex?

Not that I know that, I am just trying to to understand your logic.

Be assured that some people are not led by such -iorities,
but simply enjoy life and javascript.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

Thread

Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-26 23:07 -0700
  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-27 07:01 +0000
    Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-27 20:29 -0700
      Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-28 07:22 +0000
        Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-07-29 00:57 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-29 08:23 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:00 -0700
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2012-08-09 17:12 +0200
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-09 18:51 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Eric Bednarz" <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-08-11 02:37 +0200
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-11 07:39 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 16:01 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:58 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? SAM <stephanemoriaux.NoAdmin@wanadoo.fr.invalid> - 2012-08-09 16:01 +0200
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-11 15:56 -0700
        Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-29 21:10 +0100
          Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-07-30 08:13 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2012-07-30 11:48 +0000
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1231@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-07-31 19:45 +0100
              Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-31 17:55 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2012-08-01 07:04 +0000
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-08-01 10:53 -0700
                Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:18 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:10 -0700
          Re: Sequential JPGs? Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2012-08-04 21:09 -0700
            Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1232@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2012-08-06 19:37 +0100
  Re: Sequential JPGs? Dr J R Stockton <reply1230@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-07-28 19:22 +0100
  Re: Sequential JPGs? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-07-30 08:24 -0700

csiph-web