Re: Forth for education

From	"Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Forth for education
Date	2013-09-21 14:15 -0400
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<op.w3rw0jnc0e5s1z@localhost> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <l1erlv$cpj$1@dont-email.me> <op.w3p708180e5s1z@localhost> <ttadnb_qZO3wWKHPnZ2dnUVZ_t6dnZ2d@supernews.com> <op.w3qirpjf0e5s1z@localhost> <5O6dnfRAtOK37qDPnZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@supernews.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 21 Sep 2013 06:21:30 -0400, Andrew Haley  
<andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> wrote:

> Rod Pemberton <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Sep 2013 18:00:12 -0400, Elizabeth D. Rather
>> <erather@forth.com> wrote:
...

>>> What gets our backs up is folks who insist on slamming Forth because
>>> it's different from their favorite language, whatever it is.
>>
>> So, Hugh, who codes in Forth and hates C, slammed Forth by pointing
>> out that Forth lacks syntax?
>
> That's not a slam.  Forth has far less syntax than, say, C.

I was stating Ms. Rather's apparent perception and pointing out
her claim was contradictory.  Hugh loves Forth.  Hugh mentioned
the lack of syntax, specifically structs, in Forth.  How can
Hugh slam Forth because it's not his favorite language? (rhetorical)
(That repeats much what is quoted below.)

I like C.  She could make that claim about me or someone else.
It doesn't mean her claim is true, even then.  Not everyone is
slamming Forth because it's not their favorite language.  That's
just paranoia to think so.

>> Are you confused?  You could say that about me (wrongly), because
>> I like C.  But, how do you say that about someone who loves Forth?
>> It's not "different from [his] favorite language".  I.e., your
>> argument only holds up in your mind when you can accuse someone of
>> not loving Forth more than some other language, i.e., your bigoted.
>> If Hugh had asked to discuss the lack of syntax issue, which he
>> brought up, would you have been as offended as me continuing the
>> conversation?  You don't like him.  He trashes you.  What about
>> Alex, Bruce, Bernd?  Favoritism.
>
> They are different from you because they have a clue about how
> to use Forth.  You do not, but you don't realize it.

What you're saying is that it's acceptable to answer one person
differently from another when they ask the same question because
of your apparent bias towards that person or opinion of them or
perceived skill level.  How is that *not* being a bigot? ...

> Elizabeth is the most experienced Forth educator there is,
> posessed of great wisdom and knowledge,

I know that.

> but you don't recognize that.

I sure do.  I've stated my appreciation for her Forth knowledge
on more than one occasion.  I thanked her on more than one
occasion for her help with my Forth interpreter.  The issue
is you don't remember that I did so.  This is about the third
time you've claimed such and about the third time I've had to
defend myself from your wrong claims.

She is about the only one here who has helped me with my Forth.
Where we differ immensely is in personal beliefs, which has only
become apparent in the past couple of years.  The other who helped
me was Alex with implementing DOES> before he started attacking
me for some unknown reason.  Now he "coughs B.S." for anything
non-Forth related of which he is apparently ignorant, like
psychology.  Of course, Bernd starting attacking me years
ago for no known reason.  That was years before I ever stated
anything about C here or anything non-Forth for that matter,
back when I was just asking basic questions about Forth.
Bruce helped with a few trivial issues too.  If someone else
personally helped me, I'm sorry, I've forgotten about it.

Mostly, I sit back and wait for a good response which explains
something I'm interested in for Mark, Marcel, Albert, or you.
Eventually, it comes up...  That's if I can't find it in
the c.l.f. archives or elsewhere.

> Instead of trying to learn from people who have a clue,
> you rant on a Forth newsgroup about what a "weak language"
> Forth is, when all that knowledge is available for
> free if you only had the sense to ask.

I've pointed out all of C's faults too.  I don't believe there
is a problem with discussing problems, unlike apparently everyone
else here.  Discussing problems leads to the truth, solutions
to solve those problems, and understanding of those problems by
those who wouldn't otherwise.  You can't fix things or if you're
hiding in a dark locked closet.  You can't avoid things like
metaphorical landmines if you don't know where to *not* step.

> But I don't think you want to learn: your only purpose
> here is to be an irritant.

Wow, you have total amnesia or are being intentionally
disrepectful to me by forgetting all I've said or done...

How many years have I been posting to c.l.f.? (FYI, seven...)
How many years have I been developing my Forth interpreter?
Which version of Forth did I use as a starting point?
How many Forth words are implemented?
How many words are "primitives"?
How much of the ANS wordset is implemented?
How much of Hayes core does it pass?
What language(s) is it coded in?

All these things and more have been posted here, repeatedly,
over the years.  Where were you?

As stated previously, I'm adept in numerous programming languages,
implemented a few simple compilers and assemblers, so I don't see
how using the language prior to developing a Forth interpreter is
a hindrance.  My interpreter was entirely in C at first, although
mimicking a Forth in assembly.  Currently, the majority of it is
coded in Forth.  Almost everything I've implemented is ANS compliant
even though ANS compliance wasn't a goal.  That's about two thirds
of ANS core and core extension.

>> I think a bunch of you have yet to come to grips with the fact that
>> you're hypocrites.  Everyone here cites the problems with Forth that
>> I mentioned, but whenever anyone attempts to discuss them they get
>> trashed and blamed.
>
> That is not true.

It is true.  This has been happening for years, over numerous
threads and conversations.  Certain topics are "taboo", or
perhaps "hated" is a better word...

> You have not described any problem with Forth in
> any terms specific enough to have a conversation about.

The issues were stated earlier in the thread, but are
now snipped, by someone else.

> You have posted a completely nonsensical claim about control
> structures not having to be correctly paired.

The fact that you think it was nonsensical is the problem.
You are injecting your personal feelings about the issue or me
into something which is factual: ANS wording.

> That was incorrect,

It was correct, just as I explained it.

> and Elizabeth cited the section of ANS Forth that said they
> must be correctly paired.

It doesn't say that.  Please feel free to explain where exactly
you think it does.  I already explained my understanding.
Neither one of you has explained yours.

The fact that neither you, nor Ms. Rather, nor anyone else can
do so, nor has done so, yet, despite being asked, is a strong
indicator of the truth, whether you recognize it or not, or
argue it's false or not.

> You misunderstood that cite then ranted for a while.

That's your opinion.  That's neither fact, nor truth.

>>> If you try Forth and don't like it, fine. Cool. Use a language you
>>> prefer. What we find annoying is folks who have to hang around
>>> telling us how awful Forth is, for no apparent reason.
>>
>> So, then, you, Alex, Hugh, Bernd, Gerry, rickman, Andrew etc should
>> all leave.  You're all guilty of it.
>
> No, we're not.  We have not hung around in Language X newsgroup
> telling people how awful Language X is.  That would be pointless
> and stupid.
>

Yes, you are.  You've all cited concrete examples of Forth's
weaknesses over the years.  No, I didn't track them, maybe I
should've.  But, the large quantity is not important.  What's
important none of you will discuss the larger issues they
represent.  Those larger issues are apparently off limits
even to those, like me, who've been here for many years, and
who've implemented their own Forth interpreter in Forth.

Rod Pemberton

Thread

Forth for education visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-09-09 05:16 -0700
  Re: Forth for education Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2013-09-09 14:59 +0200
  Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-10 04:30 -0400
    Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-10 08:00 -1000
      Re: Forth for education hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-10 21:32 -0700
        Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-11 06:22 -0400
          Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-11 11:52 +0100
            Re: Forth for education Matthias Koch <matthias.koch@hot.uni-hannover.de> - 2013-09-11 14:40 +0200
            Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-12 08:10 -0400
              Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-12 14:20 +0100
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-14 22:47 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-14 17:47 -1000
                Re: Forth for education stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-09-15 17:17 +0000
                Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-15 18:52 +0100
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-15 08:11 -1000
                Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-15 19:49 +0100
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-15 09:11 -1000
                Re: Forth for education hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-15 20:38 -0700
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-17 17:21 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Spam@ControlQ.com - 2013-09-17 18:01 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-17 14:31 -1000
                Re: Forth for education hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-17 22:20 -0700
                Re: Forth for education hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-17 22:23 -0700
                Re: Forth for education Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-09-18 21:56 +0200
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-18 02:57 -0500
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-18 09:41 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-18 15:35 +0100
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-18 21:02 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-18 15:42 -1000
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 15:48 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-20 11:26 -1000
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 20:35 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-19 13:45 +0100
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 16:18 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-20 14:06 -0700
                Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 17:08 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-20 12:00 -1000
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 20:10 -0400
                Re: Forth for education hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-20 23:23 -0700
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-21 13:09 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-23 01:55 -0700
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-23 11:40 -0500
                Re: Forth for education albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-09-23 17:45 +0000
                Re: Forth for education anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-09-23 18:47 +0000
                Re: Forth for education albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-09-24 17:00 +0000
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-23 14:51 -0500
                Re: Forth for education albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-09-24 16:50 +0000
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-24 12:02 -0500
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-21 05:21 -0500
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-21 14:15 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-21 08:52 -1000
                Re: Forth for education Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-21 14:23 -0700
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-22 04:53 -0500
                Re: Forth for education hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-22 19:00 -0700
                Re: Forth for education Whammo <sidciavic@gmail.com> - 2013-09-22 21:22 -0700
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-23 08:13 -1000
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-25 04:25 -0400
                Re: Forth for education visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-09-24 21:38 -0700
                Re: Forth for education Rob Sciuk <rob@controlq.com> - 2013-09-23 12:07 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-23 11:50 -0500
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-25 03:58 -0400
                Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-26 09:32 -0400
                Re: Forth for education hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-27 19:35 -0700
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-28 01:08 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-28 01:09 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-25 03:21 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-25 04:00 -0500
                Re: Forth for education Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-09-25 09:26 -0700
                Re: Forth for education visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-09-25 15:14 -0700
                Re: Forth for education Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-09-26 07:51 -0400
                Re: Forth for education visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-09-26 23:36 -0700
                Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 14:40 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-21 04:46 -0500
                Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-18 11:41 -0500
                Re: Forth for education Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-09-18 22:08 +0100
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-18 21:10 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-18 16:20 -1000
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 16:39 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-09-19 12:47 +0100
                Re: Forth for education Spam@ControlQ.com - 2013-09-19 11:30 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-09-19 16:48 +0100
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 16:51 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-09-20 23:17 +0100
                Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 15:19 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-25 03:31 -0400
                Re: Forth for education hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-09-18 21:12 -0700
                Re: Forth for education Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-19 01:02 -0700
                Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 15:26 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 17:09 -0400
                Re: Forth for education anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-09-19 11:28 +0000
                Re: Forth for education Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-09-18 18:30 -0700
                Re: Forth for education "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-19 22:51 +0000
                Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-15 14:06 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-09-15 19:56 -0700
              Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-12 08:03 -1000
          Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-11 08:59 -1000
            Re: Forth for education albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-09-12 10:48 +0000
              Re: Forth for education Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-09-12 08:17 -0500
        Re: Forth for education "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-13 12:48 +0000
          Re: Forth for education Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-13 06:33 -0700
          Re: Forth for education m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-09-13 07:25 -0700
          Re: Forth for education visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-09-13 21:20 -0700
          Re: Forth for education "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-15 09:04 +0000
            Re: Forth for education mhx@iae.nl - 2013-09-15 02:57 -0700
        Forth is not interactive "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-20 03:32 +0000
          Re: Forth is not interactive rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 01:20 -0400
          Re: Forth is not interactive Whammo <sidciavic@gmail.com> - 2013-09-19 23:41 -0700
            Re: Forth is not interactive "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-19 21:45 -1000
              Re: Forth is not interactive "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 04:09 -0400
                Re: Forth is not interactive "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-19 22:21 -1000
                WJ, aka William James [was Re: Forth is not interactive] "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-20 10:55 +0100
                Re: WJ, aka William James [was Re: Forth is not interactive] Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-20 06:17 -0700
                Re: WJ, aka William James [was Re: Forth is not interactive] rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 13:19 -0400
                Re: WJ, aka William James [was Re: Forth is not interactive] "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-20 19:45 +0100
                Re: WJ, aka William James [was Re: Forth is not interactive] rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 14:53 -0400
              Re: Forth is not interactive Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-20 01:20 -0700
          Re: Forth is not interactive Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-20 02:35 -0700
            Re: Forth is not interactive Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-09-20 02:39 -0700
          Re: Forth is not interactive mhx@iae.nl - 2013-09-21 04:05 -0700
          Re: Forth is not interactive albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-09-21 12:43 +0000
    Re: Forth for education stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-09-12 14:04 +0000
    Re: Forth for education "Ed" <invalid@invalid.com> - 2013-09-15 18:00 +1000
  Re: Forth for education voidvolker@gmail.com - 2013-09-14 10:41 -0700
    Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-14 10:53 -1000
  Re: Forth for education "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-09-19 22:33 +0000
    Re: Forth for education visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-09-19 17:17 -0700
      Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 17:44 -0400
        Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-20 23:58 +0100
          Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-20 19:49 -0400
            Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-21 20:33 +0100
              Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-25 03:49 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-09-25 09:42 +0100
                Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-26 09:39 -0400
                Re: Forth for education Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-09-26 10:40 -0400
                Re: Forth for education "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-09-26 08:51 -1000
        Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-20 22:50 -0400
          Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-21 14:27 -0400
            Re: Forth for education rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-09-21 15:33 -0400
              Re: Forth for education "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@nohavenotit.com> - 2013-09-25 03:37 -0400
        Re: Forth for education Paul E Bennett <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2013-09-21 10:02 +0100

csiph-web