Re: Arm registers

From	Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com>
Newsgroups	comp.arch.embedded
Subject	Re: Arm registers
Date	2021-04-18 14:07 +0000
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<s5heec$q5c$3@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <s5ee5e$9u8$1@dont-email.me> <s5f09r$5rs$2@reader1.panix.com> <s5f885$vrc$1@dont-email.me> <s5fdgd$8qr$3@reader1.panix.com> <s5grgt$ule$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Apparantly you read a different version of the GNU copyright
than I did but I didn't read it all. It does vary with
time.

Hul

Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> wrote:
> Your code is just data passed through the tools, the GNU
> copyright does not limit it.

> You'll be safe as long as you are not going to modify the
> tools. Even then you have to publish the modifications, not
> the code processed using the tools.

> For libraries, there is the GNU LGPL coversin such cases
> and permitting to use them.

> -- 

> -TV


> On 17.4.2021 22:38 PM, Hul Tytus wrote:
> > Tauno - just the GNU copyright provides reason for not using it.
> > I would expect anyone using it, or considering same, to a major extent, whether
> > government sponsored or private, would look closely.
> > 
> > Hul
> > 
> > Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> wrote:
> >> On 17.4.21 18.53, Hul Tytus wrote:
> >>> David - I'm in the process of putting together an assembler for the Arm
> >>> 32 bit processors. There is no all-knowing compiler envolved so I need
> >>> to know what machine codes are valid for a given processor. Any suggestions
> >>> on where that information can be found?
> > 
> > 
> >> Why on earth?
> > 
> >> What is wrong with the GNU arm-none-eabi-as?
> > 
> >> The arm-none-eabi-gcc has switches for different processor
> >> architectures.
> > 
> >> ARM has an instruction reference card for Thumb2, with
> >> different processors marked on the card.
> > 
> >> -- 
> > 
> >> -TV

Thread

Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-16 19:30 +0000
  Re: Arm registers Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-04-16 16:20 -0400
    Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-16 22:12 +0000
      Re: Arm registers Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-04-16 19:41 -0400
        Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-17 15:43 +0000
          Re: Arm registers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2021-04-17 21:45 +0100
            Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-18 13:57 +0000
              Re: Arm registers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2021-04-18 16:31 +0100
                Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-19 21:22 +0000
  Re: Arm registers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-17 12:43 +0200
    Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-17 15:53 +0000
      Re: Arm registers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-17 18:50 +0200
        Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-17 19:30 +0000
          Re: Arm registers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-18 15:02 +0200
      Re: Arm registers Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2021-04-17 13:16 -0400
        Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-17 19:23 +0000
        Re: Arm registers Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2021-04-17 21:42 +0100
      Re: Arm registers Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2021-04-17 21:09 +0300
        Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-17 19:38 +0000
          Re: Arm registers Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2021-04-18 11:44 +0300
            Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-18 14:07 +0000
          Re: Arm registers David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2021-04-18 15:10 +0200
      Re: Arm registers antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2021-04-17 21:05 +0000
        Re: Arm registers Hul Tytus <ht@panix.com> - 2021-04-18 14:00 +0000

csiph-web