Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.aviation > #27484
| From | Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.aviation |
| Subject | Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. |
| Date | 2025-01-25 22:36 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <lvk0m9Fk87oU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <lvgpdlF3t5nU2@mid.individual.net> <op.20vdh9dzbyq249@pvr2.lan> <lvhkmqF8lmsU1@mid.individual.net> <lvihukFd5foU1@mid.individual.net> <lvjmkaFiof3U1@mid.individual.net> |
On 25/1/2025 7:44 pm, Sylvia Else wrote: > On 25-Jan-25 6:19 am, Daryl wrote: >> On 25/1/2025 12:59 am, Sylvia Else wrote: >>> On 24-Jan-25 4:21 pm, Rod Speed wrote: >>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote >>>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote >>>>>>> Rod Speed wrote >>>>>>>> Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote >>>> >>>>>>>>> https://www.atsb.gov.au/publications/ >>>>>>>>> investigation_reports/2025/ report/ao-2024-038 >>>> >>>>>>>>> It's time all public transport aircraft had takeoff >>>>>>>>> performance monitoring, no matter the size. >>>> >>>>>>>> That isnt going to result in the problem being >>>>>>>> fixed quickly enough to stop an accident >>>> >>>>>>> Well before an abort becomes risky, the system has enough >>>>>>> informationto determine whether the crew calculated v1 and vr >>>>>>> are correct, >>>> >>>>>> Bullshit with that incorrect flaps setting. >>>> >>>>>>> and whether the aircraft will be able toboth continue a >>>>>>> takeoff, and stop, at v1. >>>> >>>>>> Bullshit with that incorrect flaps setting, let alone >>>>>> tell the pilots that the flaps setting is wrong. >>>> >>>>>> It would make much more sense to compare the >>>>>> actual settings with that has been entered at the >>>>>> preflight config calculations and tell the pilots >>>>>> that they have not set what was required with >>>>>> flaps and boost etc before they actually applied >>>>>> takeoff power and not allow takeoff power to be >>>>>> applied before those were set correctly. >>>> >>>>>>> It can issue an abort alert if not. >>>> >>>>>> See above >>>> >>>>>>> This covers at least miscalculated v1, miscalculated vr, wrong >>>>>>> thrust settings, wrong flap settings, starting from the wrong >>>>>>> intersection, takeoff from the wrong runway, and no doubt others >>>>>>> that I haven't even thought of. >>>> >>>>>> It would be stupid to try to measure that while taking off >>>>>> instead of doing that before takeoff power is applied >>>> >>>>>> Yes, there is also a different problem with the engines >>>>>> not being able to deliver the power they were assumed >>>>>> to be able to deliver the power they were supposed to >>>>>> be able to deliver in the preflight calculations, but that >>>>>> was not the case in the incident being discussed and >>>>>> it would be much easier to discover than much earlier >>>>>> in the takeoff run than V1 or VR >>>> >>>>> The question the system needs to ask is "In the current >>>>> configuration, with the measured acceleration [*], current >>>>> airspeed, and current position on the current runway, can the >>>>> aircraft reach the specified V1 at a point where it can continue >>>>> the takeoff or abort, and will it be able to rotate at the >>>>> specified Vr. >>>> >>>> The problem with that approach is that is far too late >>>> during the takeoff run to be doing that by measurement >>>> when its much too late for the pilots to be fixing what >>>> the problem is, particularly when the engines arent >>>> actually performing the way they were meant to when >>>> the prefight calculations were done >>> >>> There would be no expectation that the pilots would fix it. The idea >>> is to abort the takeoff while that can still be done safely. >> >> I assume that you are talking about some sort of automated system to >> alert pilots of a configuration error? >> If so wouldn't that rely on data input by the pilots prior to takeoff >> so the system would be only as good as the data therefore it doesn't >> completely eliminate the chances of an error? >> In this incident did the pilots self report? >> If they didn't why would the ATSB investigate? >> >> >> >> > > My thinking is that the system has access to the settings for flap, > thrust, mass, V1 and Vr. None of these is assumed to be correct. > > Also access to GPS and airspeed. > > In the following, the system would allow some level of discrepancy so as > not to cause unnecessary aborts. > > Once the aircraft is accelerating, its direction together with the GPS > calculated position allows the system to determine which runway the > aircraft is on (position alone may not be sufficient, where runways > intersect). > > The acceleration to be expected from a given thrust setting depends on > the aircraft's mass, and its airspeed. So the system waits until there > is a reliable airspeed. It then can calculate the mass from the expected > thrust, the acceleration and the airspeed. The result should match the > setting. If it doesn't this means that either the mass is set wrong, or > the expected thrust, based on the thrust setting, is not being achieved. > Either of these aborts the takeoff. > > Vr can now be calculated based the mass and flap setting. If the > calculated Vr differs from the set Vr, this aborts the takeoff. > > From the current position, the acceleration and the mass, the braking > distance can be calculated [*], and from that V1. If the calculated V1 > is lower than the set V1, then abort take off. > > [*] This is one area of uncertainty, since braking distance depends on > runway condition (wet, dry, etc.). > > Sylvia. > > My piloting experience is 5hrs training in a helicopter so not much but to me it sounds a bit complex and still open to input error to be of much value? Might be feasible on newer complex aircraft but retrofitting such a system on older aircraft would most likely be very expensive and maybe not even possible. You didn't answer the question about self reporting, was that mentioned in the ATSB report? -- Daryl
Back to aus.aviation | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-21 13:28 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-23 04:21 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-23 12:50 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-23 20:09 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-24 14:14 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 19:21 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-24 21:59 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 03:46 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2025-01-25 09:19 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-25 13:17 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 19:34 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-25 16:44 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2025-01-25 22:36 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-25 22:12 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Daryl <dwalford@westpine.com.au> - 2025-01-26 09:36 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 10:07 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 02:21 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-26 16:29 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-26 20:14 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-27 12:17 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 19:52 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-27 16:56 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 04:33 +1100
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> - 2025-01-28 11:52 +0800
Re: Dash-8 incorrect takeoff configuration. "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2025-01-28 15:57 +1100
csiph-web