Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #46470 > unrolled thread

Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year.

Started bybenj <none@gmail.com>
First post2016-02-16 11:07 -0500
Last post2016-02-16 22:33 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 65 — 17 participants

Back to article view | Back to alt.free.newsservers

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:07 -0500
    Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:45 -0500
      There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 11:24 -0800
        Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
          The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 13:00 -0800
            Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 16:52 -0500
              Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 16:50 -0800
                Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 17:29 -0800
                  Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 06:44 -0600
                    Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 16:50 -0800
                      Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:00 -0500
                        Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0800
                          Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0000
                            Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 23:00 -0800
                          Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:49 -0500
                            Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 23:07 -0800
                            Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 23:23 -0800
                              Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 02:46 -0500
                                Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-20 08:23 -0800
                        Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-20 08:11 +0000
                          Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:13 -0500
                            Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 17:36 +0000
                              Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:35 -0500
                          Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:29 -0500
                            Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 17:44 +0000
                              Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:53 -0700
                                Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 18:25 +0000
                                  Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:29 -0700
                                    Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 18:37 +0000
                                      Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:37 -0700
                                        Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 13:51 -0600
                                          Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:56 -0700
                                            Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:16 -0500
                                              Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:18 -0700
                                                Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:20 -0500
                                                  Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:22 -0700
                                                    Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:27 -0500
                                                      Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:30 -0700
                                                        Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:45 -0500
                                                  Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:23 -0700
                                                    Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:28 -0500
                                                      Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0700
                                                        Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 16:04 -0500
                                                          Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:10 -0800
                                                    Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:30 -0700
                                                Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 15:07 -0600
                                            Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 15:05 -0600
                                Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. TOSEM <7he0ther5ide0f3ternal.Midnight@derbyshire.kooks.out.example.invalid> - 2016-03-03 23:13 +1000
            Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-17 15:34 -0500
          Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 16:19 -0500
            Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-16 22:53 +0000
              Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 06:32 +0100
              Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 07:03 -0500
                Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 12:16 +0000
                  Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 05:19 -0700
                    Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 12:24 +0000
                  Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 07:23 -0500
                    Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 12:32 +0000
                      Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 07:39 -0500
                        Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 08:31 -0800
                          Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:36 -0500
      Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-16 21:21 +0000
        Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 21:13 -0500
          Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 02:28 +0000
            Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:33 -0500

Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →


#46470 — Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year.

Frombenj <none@gmail.com>
Date2016-02-16 11:07 -0500
SubjectRe: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year.
Message-ID<0PHwy.64031$J36.25043@fx09.iad>
On 02/16/2016 01:41 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
>
>     Qutoing (Feb 12, 2014):
>     https://www.google.com/search?q=Linus+Torvalds+income
>     <<
>        Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary:   $10 Million Per Year.
>                          Total Worth:  $150 Million.
>
>        Creator of Revision Control System and Git besides Kernel.
>        Torvalds first priority is FOSS, but he never minds using
>        Proprietary software to get best result. >>
>
>
Hey Rolf, just look at yourself sitting in in the dark mom's basement 
and COMPARE!

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#46472

From"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com>
Date2016-02-16 11:45 -0500
Message-ID<n9vjhc$prl$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46470
"benj" <none@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:0PHwy.64031$J36.25043@fx09.iad...
> On 02/16/2016 01:41 AM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>>
>>
>>     Qutoing (Feb 12, 2014):
>>     https://www.google.com/search?q=Linus+Torvalds+income
>>     <<<<
>>        Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary:   $10 Million Per Year.
>>                          Total Worth:  $150 Million.
>>     <<<<
>>        Creator of Revision Control System and Git besides Kernel.
>>        Torvalds first priority is FOSS, but he never minds using
>>        Proprietary software to get best result. >>
>>

Jeff - if you posted this to COLA then it's not showing up on my end. Still 
using your custom HTML client??

$10-million/year - didn't look it up but when you usually see a number like 
that it's not "salary."  It's salary and stuff like stock-options, bonus and 
other "incentives." Either way, good for Linus. It's what a similar 
positions pay at other companies and he's earned the $$$.



> Hey Rolf, just look at yourself sitting in in the dark mom's basement and 
> COMPARE!

Linus is beyond the top 0.1% income level.



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46484 — There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here.

FromJeff-Relf.Me <@.>
Date2016-02-16 11:24 -0800
SubjectThere are too many "Richard Stallmans" here.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16{11.24A.Seattle.2016}>
In reply to#46472
MrEzekiel wrote:
> Linus is beyond the top 0.1% income level.

There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here,
and not enough Linuses.

Ben Jacoby wrote:
> > Hey Rolf, just look at yourself sitting in mom's basement and COMPARE!

Ben Jacoby intentionally avoids facts and logic.
In his little dream world, I'm not the manager 
of a 32 unit apartment building (nor a C++ programmer).

Yesterday, I strung a 75 foot ethernet cable
for one of my tenants.  It costs $10:
http://www.amazon.com/Ethernet-Cable-CAT5e-75-White/dp/B00161MNZW

Most cell phones can't handle WiFi properly,
even when 15 feet from the WiFi source.
Notebooks/Consoles are better, desktops are best.

Many of my ( young, Univ. of Wash. ) tenants don't have desktops;
but they've got gaming consoles.

MrEzekiel wrote:
> Jeff - if you posted this to COLA then it's not showing up on my end.
> Still using your custom HTML client??

CraigsList allows a limited set of HTML tags,
as do many other forums; HTML is not a crime.
My posts begin:

  <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'>

I drop posts from the following servers:

  Eternal-September  Motzarella  Aioe  Dizum  Albasani

If you want me to see your posts, don't use these servers.
[ I see _all_ replies to me, no matter who/where from ]

My servers are the best:

  http://usenet.blueworldhosting.com
  http://glorb.com/usenet.php

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46485 — Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here.

From"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com>
Date2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
SubjectRe: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here.
Message-ID<na00et$h0b$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46484
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote in message 
news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16{11.24A.Seattle.2016}...
> MrEzekiel wrote:
>> Linus is beyond the top 0.1% income level.
>
> There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here,
> and not enough Linuses.

In the entire world there are many more Richard Stallmans than people like 
Linus making $10M a year.


> Ben Jacoby wrote:
>> > Hey Rolf, just look at yourself sitting in mom's basement and COMPARE!
>
> Ben Jacoby intentionally avoids facts and logic.
> In his little dream world, I'm not the manager
> of a 32 unit apartment building (nor a C++ programmer).

32 units is a lot. Do you get a lot of people complaining about stuff?


> Yesterday, I strung a 75 foot ethernet cable
> for one of my tenants.  It costs $10:
> http://www.amazon.com/Ethernet-Cable-CAT5e-75-White/dp/B00161MNZW

Running internet cable can be really easy or real hard. It's a matter of 
finding a good way to run it from end to end. Unfinished basements and 
attics are easier than ceilings and walls.


> Most cell phones can't handle WiFi properly,
> even when 15 feet from the WiFi source.
> Notebooks/Consoles are better, desktops are best.

Never had a problem with the phone Wifi. My desktop has a wired connection.


> Many of my ( young, Univ. of Wash. ) tenants don't have desktops;
> but they've got gaming consoles.
>
> MrEzekiel wrote:
>> Jeff - if you posted this to COLA then it's not showing up on my end.
>> Still using your custom HTML client??
>
> CraigsList allows a limited set of HTML tags,
> as do many other forums; HTML is not a crime.
> My posts begin:
>
>  <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'>

I''ve listed stuff on CL before. You just type or copy-paste the tags into 
the edit box. You don't use your newsreader for that do you?

HTML is not a crime. Web sites with excessive javascript should be.



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46486 — The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it.

FromJeff-Relf.Me <@.>
Date2016-02-16 13:00 -0800
SubjectThe latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16{1.00P.Seattle.2016}>
In reply to#46485
You (MrEzekiel) replied (to me):
> > Most cell phones can't handle WiFi properly,
> > even when 15 feet from the WiFi source.
> > Notebooks/Consoles are better, desktops are best.
> 
> Never had a problem with the phone Wifi.
> My desktop has a wired connection.

The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK, but others don't;
even so, it's not great -- I wouldn't use it.
A desktop with a decent WiFi adaptor works well.

> > Ben Jacoby intentionally avoids facts and logic.
> > In his little dream world, I'm not the manager
> > of a 32 unit apartment building (nor a C++ programmer).
> 
> 32 units is a lot. 
> Do you get a lot of people complaining about stuff?

All day, every day.
I move people into/out_of units; lots of turnover.
I do most of the work myself, without help.

Minimum wage, here in Seattle, is #13/hour this year,
$15/hour next year.  Parking is $120/month.
Gas is $2.50/callon, I think (I don't drive).

> > There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here,
> > and not enough Linuses.
> 
> In the entire world there are many more Richard Stallmans 
> than people like Linus making $10M a year.

I don't expect everyone here to be rich;
but, also, I don't expect them to think like Richard Stallman.

> > CraigsList allows a limited set of HTML tags,
> > as do many other forums; HTML is not a crime.
> > My posts begin:
> >
> >  <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'>
> 
> I've listed stuff on CL before. You just type or copy-paste the tags into 
> the edit box. You don't use your newsreader for that do you?

My CraigsList posts begin:

  <h2><pre>

That's it, nothing more (HTML-wise).
I just type it in.  My current ad:

  http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/roo/5414506921.html

> HTML is not a crime. 
> Web sites with excessive javascript should be.

If I like a site, I whitelist some of its JavaScript servers,
and I write CSS rules for it; to wit:  

  http://Jeff-Relf.Me/userContent.CSS.TXT

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46489 — Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it.

From"Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com>
Date2016-02-16 16:52 -0500
SubjectRe: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it.
Message-ID<na05go$56v$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46486
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote in message 
news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16{1.00P.Seattle.2016}...
> You (MrEzekiel) replied (to me):
>> > Most cell phones can't handle WiFi properly,
>> > even when 15 feet from the WiFi source.
>> > Notebooks/Consoles are better, desktops are best.
>>
>> Never had a problem with the phone Wifi.
>> My desktop has a wired connection.
>
> The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK, but others don't;
> even so, it's not great -- I wouldn't use it.
> A desktop with a decent WiFi adaptor works well.

What's not working? I can tether my laptop through my phone to do SSH port 
forwarding. If this works then I'd expect just about everything else to work 
with phone wifi.

 >> > Ben Jacoby intentionally avoids facts and logic.
>> > In his little dream world, I'm not the manager
>> > of a 32 unit apartment building (nor a C++ programmer).
>>
>> 32 units is a lot.
>> Do you get a lot of people complaining about stuff?
>
> All day, every day.
> I move people into/out_of units; lots of turnover.
> I do most of the work myself, without help.

I owned more than one house in the past and did 95% of the work myself. 
There's always plenty of work to do. You have 32 units and at least that 
many tenants. I only had a wife and 4 kids and that was plenty to keep me 
busy.

> Minimum wage, here in Seattle, is #13/hour this year,
> $15/hour next year.  Parking is $120/month.
> Gas is $2.50/callon, I think (I don't drive).

I don't drive nearly as much as I used to so my gas bill is practically 
nothing. The monthly train pass is $75 but the company pays for it. I paid 
for the gas myself.


>> > There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here,
>> > and not enough Linuses.
>>
>> In the entire world there are many more Richard Stallmans
>> than people like Linus making $10M a year.
>
> I don't expect everyone here to be rich;
> but, also, I don't expect them to think like Richard Stallman.
>
>> > CraigsList allows a limited set of HTML tags,
>> > as do many other forums; HTML is not a crime.
>> > My posts begin:
>> >
>> >  <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'>
>>
>> I've listed stuff on CL before. You just type or copy-paste the tags into
>> the edit box. You don't use your newsreader for that do you?
>
> My CraigsList posts begin:
>
>  <h2><pre>
>
> That's it, nothing more (HTML-wise).
> I just type it in.  My current ad:
>
>  http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/roo/5414506921.html
>
>> HTML is not a crime.
>> Web sites with excessive javascript should be.
>
> If I like a site, I whitelist some of its JavaScript servers,
> and I write CSS rules for it; to wit:
>
>  http://Jeff-Relf.Me/userContent.CSS.TXT 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46491 — Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

FromJeff-Relf.Me <@.>
Date2016-02-16 16:50 -0800
SubjectMost phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16{4.50P.Seattle.2016}>
In reply to#46489
You (MrEzekiel) replied (to me):
> > > > Most cell phones can't handle WiFi properly,
> > > > even when 15 feet from the WiFi source.
> > > > Notebooks/Consoles are better, desktops are best.
> > >
> > > Never had a problem with the phone Wifi.
> > > My desktop has a wired connection.
> >
> > The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK, but others don't;
> > even so, it's not great -- I wouldn't use it.
> > A desktop with a decent WiFi adaptor works well.
> 
> What's not working?  I can tether my laptop through my phone 
> to do SSH port forwarding.  If this works then I'd expect 
> just about everything else to work with phone wifi.

Why "through [your] phone" ?
Why not connect your laptop to the same WiFi source
that your phone is using ?

Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

I should find a scientific study on this,
but I don't feel like it, not right now.

P.S. Gas is $2.50/gallon here, I checked.

Outside of Seattle, it's $1.60/gallon.

Everything is cheaper outside of Seattle,
more so than usual, so I'm having trouble finding renters.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46492 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-02-16 17:29 -0800
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<na0i9j$glc$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46491
Copro-Rectal Sucker Addict "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> ::JR:: wrote:
"I'm having trouble finding renters", since....
>
::JR:: I no longer want sex anymore.  I  masturbate. I've found  that
::JR:: all these erections & masturbations can irratate my prostate.
::JR:: My problem mostly happens a few hours before I want to
::JR:: wake up, so I can't take Sudafed.
::JR:: Ejaculation is a mind-altering drug, no better than heroin
::JR:: or meth.    So I've recently vowed to not masturbate...
::JR:: I use my left hand to smoke, masturbate and to type ...
::JR:: Does that make me smart ? --  I'd rather masturbate.
::JR:: She likes to squirt meth up her rear ( it makes her cum).
::JR:: but pussy is the last thing I want.
         (cuz Relf is apparently interested now in Swine Glazier's antics)
::JR:: My dreams, however, have been semi-erotic as of late..."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46525 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

Fromchrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid>
Date2016-02-17 06:44 -0600
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<2qq8cb1tc7n4u2uqa4udo46ar4cgn2euk5@4ax.com>
In reply to#46492
hanson wrote:

>Copro-Rectal Sucker Addict "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> ::JR:: wrote:

*plonk*

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46778 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-02-19 16:50 -0800
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<na8d3a$fsd$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46525
"chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> is a renter applicant for a room 
in the apartment complex for the indigent, druggies and pervs,
which is  managed by masturbator & Copro-Rectal Meht Sucker
 Addict "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.>, to whom chrisv submitted his  
*plonk*-CV, and his MO that says:
>
Re: Alison cries out for her waif // Group: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
Privacy and discretion assured. My sphere of interest: Adult swim, 
aqua teen, bondage, dead can ... 3/3/13 by chrisv, 
email me at mail to: chrisv@nospam.invalid. 
>
hanson (at sci.physics) wrote:
.... ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA.. You guys are even
more extreme pervs then is cretin Full-Swine Glazier who
 advertises hims in s.p as being a Face-Shitter & Graveyard
Vandal .... So, carry on and enjoy... ahahahahAHAHAHA...
>
Now then, when you guys do manage to get a moment of
sobriety and lucidity make yourself useful by correcting, or 
having the coders at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present
glitch therein. It apears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
>
Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
(letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
>
correcting that should a cinch for brainiacs like you, n'est pas.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46792 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-02-19 23:00 -0500
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<na8odb$3at$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#46778
Possible ko0kery specimen for your perusal. Opinions? Is this "hanson" 
guy a lOon? Gives more than just a whiff of wackiness to my experienced 
and well-honed nose at least...

On 19/02/2016 7:50 PM, hanson wrote:
x> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> is a renter applicant for a room in the
x> apartment complex for the indigent, druggies and pervs,
x> which is  managed by masturbator & Copro-Rectal Meht Sucker
x> Addict "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.>, to whom chrisv submitted his *plonk*-CV, and
x> his MO that says:
x>>
x> Re: Alison cries out for her waif // Group: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
x> Privacy and discretion assured. My sphere of interest: Adult swim, aqua
x> teen, bondage, dead can ... 3/3/13 by chrisv, email me at mail to:
x> chrisv@nospam.invalid.
x>>
x> hanson (at sci.physics) wrote:
x> .... ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA.. You guys are even
x> more extreme pervs then is cretin Full-Swine Glazier who
x> advertises hims in s.p as being a Face-Shitter & Graveyard
x> Vandal .... So, carry on and enjoy... ahahahahAHAHAHA...
x>>
x> Now then, when you guys do manage to get a moment of
x> sobriety and lucidity make yourself useful by correcting, or having the
x> coders at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present
x> glitch therein. It apears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
x>>
x> Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
x> (letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
x> You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
x> EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
x>>
x> correcting that should a cinch for brainiacs like you, n'est pas.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46805 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-02-19 20:58 -0800
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<na8rll$6ra$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46792
kensidiotic "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> Possible ko0kery specimen for your perusal. Opinions? Is this "hanson" guy 
> a lOon? Gives more than just a whiff of wackiness to my experienced and 
> well-honed nose at least...
>
hanson wrote:
Kensishit, you sordid, despicable pig, your zonker is full of
well-honed Dingleberries from you sucking up to the Sphincters
of Relf and Chrisv.
>
Now listen up, and when you have cleaned your nose
and do manage to get a moment of sobriety and lucidity
make yourself useful by correcting, or having the coders
at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present glitch therein.
It appears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
>
Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
(letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
>
Correcting that should a cinch for a brainiac like you, kensi,
... or are you just a loud-mouthing kensishit? --- So, fix it,
and brag, or get the fuck away from me you perverted turd.
>
>
>
>
.> On 19/02/2016 7:50 PM, hanson wrote:
> x> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> is a renter applicant for a room in 
> the
> x> apartment complex for the indigent, druggies and pervs,
> x> which is  managed by masturbator & Copro-Rectal Meht Sucker
> x> Addict "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.>, to whom chrisv submitted his *plonk*-CV, 
> and
> x> his MO that says:
> x>>
> x> Re: Alison cries out for her waif // Group: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
> x> Privacy and discretion assured. My sphere of interest: Adult swim, aqua
> x> teen, bondage, dead can ... 3/3/13 by chrisv, email me at mail to:
> x> chrisv@nospam.invalid.
> x>>
> x> hanson (at sci.physics) wrote:
> x> .... ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA.. You guys are even
> x> more extreme pervs then is cretin Full-Swine Glazier who
> x> advertises hims in s.p as being a Face-Shitter & Graveyard
> x> Vandal .... So, carry on and enjoy... ahahahahAHAHAHA...
> x>>
> x> Now then, when you guys do manage to get a moment of
> x> sobriety and lucidity make yourself useful by correcting, or having the
> x> coders at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present
> x> glitch therein. It apears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
> x>>
> x> Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
> x> (letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
> x> You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
> x> EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
> x>>
> x> correcting that should a cinch for brainiacs like you, n'est pas.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46813 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

Fromowl <owl@rooftop.invalid>
Date2016-02-20 05:59 +0000
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<fd04afe.jfak@rooftop.invalid>
In reply to#46805
In comp.os.linux.advocacy hanson <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
> kensidiotic "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> Possible ko0kery specimen for your perusal. Opinions? Is this "hanson" guy 
>> a lOon? Gives more than just a whiff of wackiness to my experienced and 
>> well-honed nose at least...
>>
> hanson wrote:
> Kensishit, you sordid, despicable pig, your zonker is full of
> well-honed Dingleberries from you sucking up to the Sphincters
> of Relf and Chrisv.
>>
> Now listen up, and when you have cleaned your nose
> and do manage to get a moment of sobriety and lucidity
> make yourself useful by correcting, or having the coders
> at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present glitch therein.
> It appears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
>>
> Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
> (letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
> You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
> EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
>>
> Correcting that should a cinch for a brainiac like you, kensi,
> ... or are you just a loud-mouthing kensishit? --- So, fix it,
> and brag, or get the fuck away from me you perverted turd.

It's not 108.  It's 73 ('I').
Autocorrect is changing it.  Delete the autocorrect entry for "i".

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46820 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-02-19 23:00 -0800
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<na92pd$o93$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46813
"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
In comp.os.linux.advocacy 
hanson <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
... correct, or having the coders at "Office Libre's Calc"
fix a long present glitch therein.
It appears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
>>>
Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
(letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
>>>
"owl" wrote:
It's not 108.  It's 73 ('I').
Autocorrect is changing it.  Delete the autocorrect entry for "i".
>
hanson wrote:
Thanks owl. You are a good man! I'll check it out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46818 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-02-20 01:49 -0500
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<na92ar$eah$1@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#46805
On 19/02/2016 11:58 PM, hanson wrote:
> kensidiotic "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> Possible ko0kery specimen for your perusal. Opinions? Is this "hanson"
>> guy a lOon? Gives more than just a whiff of wackiness to my
>> experienced and well-honed nose at least...
>>
> hanson wrote:
> Kensishit, you sordid, despicable pig, your zonker is full of
> well-honed Dingleberries from you sucking up to the Sphincters
> of Relf and Chrisv.

Wow, one little question from me and out comes the insult equivalent of 
a nuclear-tipped ICBM from little "hanson" here. I'm definitely getting 
a strong vibe of kOok from this one now!

The silent snecking of AUK and adding of a random new newsgroup is also 
a very bad sign for "hanson"'s mental health. That AUK strikes such a 
deep and abiding terror into "hanson"'s heart is indicative of a truth 
about himself that he refuses, as yet, to face.

*snicker*

> Now listen up, and when you have cleaned your nose
> and do manage to get a moment of sobriety and lucidity
> make yourself useful by correcting, or having the coders
> at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present glitch therein.
> It appears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
>>
> Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
> (letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
> You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
> EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
>>
> Correcting that should a cinch for a brainiac like you, kensi,
> ... or are you just a loud-mouthing kensishit? --- So, fix it,
> and brag, or get the fuck away from me you perverted turd.

Now the g0of is *demanding* that I fix software I have no involvement 
with, for no rational reason discernible.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46822 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

From"Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge>
Date2016-02-19 23:07 -0800
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<MPG.3131b091dd90f69198c824@news.altopia.com>
In reply to#46818
In article <na92ar$eah$1@gioia.aioe.org>, kkensington01@gmail.invalid 
says...


> 
> On 19/02/2016 11:58 PM, hanson wrote:
> > kensidiotic "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >> Possible ko0kery specimen for your perusal. Opinions? Is this "hanson"
> >> guy a lOon? Gives more than just a whiff of wackiness to my
> >> experienced and well-honed nose at least...
> >>
> > hanson wrote:
> > Kensishit, you sordid, despicable pig, your zonker is full of
> > well-honed Dingleberries from you sucking up to the Sphincters
> > of Relf and Chrisv.
> 
> Wow, one little question from me and out comes the insult equivalent of 
> a nuclear-tipped ICBM from little "hanson" here. I'm definitely getting 
> a strong vibe of kOok from this one now!
> 
> The silent snecking of AUK and adding of a random new newsgroup is also 
> a very bad sign for "hanson"'s mental health. That AUK strikes such a 
> deep and abiding terror into "hanson"'s heart is indicative of a truth 
> about himself that he refuses, as yet, to face.
> 
> *snicker*
> 
> > Now listen up, and when you have cleaned your nose
> > and do manage to get a moment of sobriety and lucidity
> > make yourself useful by correcting, or having the coders
> > at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present glitch therein.
> > It appears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
> >>
> > Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
> > (letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
> > You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
> > EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
> >>
> > Correcting that should a cinch for a brainiac like you, kensi,
> > ... or are you just a loud-mouthing kensishit? --- So, fix it,
> > and brag, or get the fuck away from me you perverted turd.
> 
> Now the g0of is *demanding* that I fix software I have no involvement 
> with, for no rational reason discernible.

Let's all faglame him!

-- 

Checkmate, AUK DoW #1, new FNVW of AUK, and Fakey's master
AUK Hammer of Thor award, Feb. 2012 (Pre-Burnore)
Destroyer of the AUK Ko0k Vote  (Post-Burnore)
Originator of the "Dance for me" (tm) lame
Copyright © 2016 
all rights reserved 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46824 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-02-19 23:23 -0800
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<na944a$rhl$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46818
"KOOkensi" <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> the "kensidiot"
is a doped up drunkard and a filthy swine, who cranked
 himself for realizing that his albedo is  too low and dim
to realize what was going on.... ahahahah... RTOFMAO
<
hanson wrote:
Kensiturd, listen up: Take the example of poster "owl".
"owl" suggested a quick & easy operational solution, 
while you, the kensidiotic cretin, are still loaded to your
kensigills. Thanks for the laughs though... ahahahanson

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46827 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

Fromkensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid>
Date2016-02-20 02:46 -0500
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<na95kb$im5$2@gioia.aioe.org>
In reply to#46824
On 20/02/2016 2:23 AM, hanson wrote:
> "KOOkensi" <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> the "kensidiot"
> is a doped up drunkard and a filthy swine, who cranked
> himself for realizing that his

her

> albedo is  too low and dim
> to realize what was going on.... ahahahah... RTOFMAO

Lo0n.

> <
> hanson wrote:
> Kensiturd, listen up: Take the example of poster "owl".
> "owl" suggested a quick & easy operational solution, while you, the
> kensidiotic cretin, are still loaded to your
> kensigills. Thanks for the laughs though... ahahahanson

You are laboring under the misapprehension that I was in some way 
obligated to solve your little software problem (which, by the way, has 
nothing whatsoever to do with kooks, physics, free newsservers, *or* Linux).

Oh, and please to be providing proof of your k'lame that I'm inebriated, 
kOok.

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"I get fooled all the time by the constant hosiery parade
in here."                                                     ~Checkmate

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46839 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

From"hanson" <hanson@quick.net>
Date2016-02-20 08:23 -0800
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<naa3oh$osq$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#46827
"KOOkensi" <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> 
is still licking his own Dingleberries.   LOL

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#46831 — Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2016-02-20 08:11 +0000
SubjectRe: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi.
Message-ID<1miwrtf.sn2wmgknz24fN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#46792
kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> Possible ko0kery specimen for your perusal. Opinions? Is this "hanson"
> guy a lOon? Gives more than just a whiff of wackiness to my experienced
> and well-honed nose at least...
> 
> On 19/02/2016 7:50 PM, hanson wrote:
> x> "chrisv" <chrisv@nospam.invalid> is a renter applicant for a room in the
> x> apartment complex for the indigent, druggies and pervs,
> x> which is  managed by masturbator & Copro-Rectal Meht Sucker
> x> Addict "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.>, to whom chrisv submitted his *plonk*-CV, and
> x> his MO that says:
> x>>
> x> Re: Alison cries out for her waif // Group: 24hoursupport.helpdesk
> x> Privacy and discretion assured. My sphere of interest: Adult swim, aqua
> x> teen, bondage, dead can ... 3/3/13 by chrisv, email me at mail to:
> x> chrisv@nospam.invalid.
> x>>
> x> hanson (at sci.physics) wrote:
> x> .... ahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA.. You guys are even
> x> more extreme pervs then is cretin Full-Swine Glazier who
> x> advertises hims in s.p as being a Face-Shitter & Graveyard
> x> Vandal .... So, carry on and enjoy... ahahahahAHAHAHA...
> x>>
> x> Now then, when you guys do manage to get a moment of
> x> sobriety and lucidity make yourself useful by correcting, or having the
> x> coders at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present
> x> glitch therein. It apears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
> x>>
> x> Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
> x> (letter/s) a, enter,  b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
> x> You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
> x> EXCEPT for [ i ]  (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ]  (CHR$ 108)
> x>>
> x> correcting that should a cinch for brainiacs like you, n'est pas.
>

Oh look, another example of manually edited quote-markers in a 
post written on (wait for it) User-Agent: NewsTap/4.0.1 (iPad), 
which otherwise has no facility to alter its quote-marker string.

That's very diligent of you, Paul, well done.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe       <snipeco.1@gmail.com>
        
My pet rock Gordon wants out.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 4  [1] 2 3 4  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | alt.free.newsservers


csiph-web