Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.free.newsservers > #46813
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.free.newsservers |
| Subject | Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. |
| Date | 2016-02-20 05:59 +0000 |
| Organization | O.W.L. |
| Message-ID | <fd04afe.jfak@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <na0i9j$glc$1@dont-email.me> <2qq8cb1tc7n4u2uqa4udo46ar4cgn2euk5@4ax.com> <na8d3a$fsd$1@dont-email.me> <na8odb$3at$1@gioia.aioe.org> <na8rll$6ra$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
In comp.os.linux.advocacy hanson <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
> kensidiotic "kensi" <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> Possible ko0kery specimen for your perusal. Opinions? Is this "hanson" guy
>> a lOon? Gives more than just a whiff of wackiness to my experienced and
>> well-honed nose at least...
>>
> hanson wrote:
> Kensishit, you sordid, despicable pig, your zonker is full of
> well-honed Dingleberries from you sucking up to the Sphincters
> of Relf and Chrisv.
>>
> Now listen up, and when you have cleaned your nose
> and do manage to get a moment of sobriety and lucidity
> make yourself useful by correcting, or having the coders
> at "Office Libre's Calc" fix a long present glitch therein.
> It appears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
>>
> Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
> (letter/s) a, enter, b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
> You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
> EXCEPT for [ i ] (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ] (CHR$ 108)
>>
> Correcting that should a cinch for a brainiac like you, kensi,
> ... or are you just a loud-mouthing kensishit? --- So, fix it,
> and brag, or get the fuck away from me you perverted turd.
It's not 108. It's 73 ('I').
Autocorrect is changing it. Delete the autocorrect entry for "i".
Back to alt.free.newsservers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:07 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:45 -0500
There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 11:24 -0800
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 13:00 -0800
Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 16:52 -0500
Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 16:50 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 17:29 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 06:44 -0600
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 16:50 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-19 23:00 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0000
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 23:00 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 01:49 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-19 23:07 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 23:23 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 02:46 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-20 08:23 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-20 08:11 +0000
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:13 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 17:36 +0000
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:35 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:29 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 17:44 +0000
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 10:53 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 18:25 +0000
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 11:29 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-20 18:37 +0000
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 12:37 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 13:51 -0600
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 12:56 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:16 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:18 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:20 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:22 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:27 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:30 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:45 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:23 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 15:28 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-20 13:46 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-20 16:04 -0500
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-20 16:10 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2016-02-20 13:30 -0700
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 15:07 -0600
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2016-02-20 15:05 -0600
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. TOSEM <7he0ther5ide0f3ternal.Midnight@derbyshire.kooks.out.example.invalid> - 2016-03-03 23:13 +1000
Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-17 15:34 -0500
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2016-02-16 16:19 -0500
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2016-02-16 22:53 +0000
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2016-02-17 06:32 +0100
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 07:03 -0500
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 12:16 +0000
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. Skeeter <skeet@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-17 05:19 -0700
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 12:24 +0000
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 07:23 -0500
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe, DoW #2) - 2016-02-17 12:32 +0000
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 07:39 -0500
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2016-02-17 08:31 -0800
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. buZZard <buzz@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 11:36 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-16 21:21 +0000
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 21:13 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 02:28 +0000
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:33 -0500
csiph-web