Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343960
| From | "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.free.newsservers |
| Subject | Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. |
| Date | 2016-02-19 23:00 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <na92pd$o93$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <2qq8cb1tc7n4u2uqa4udo46ar4cgn2euk5@4ax.com> <na8d3a$fsd$1@dont-email.me> <na8odb$3at$1@gioia.aioe.org> <na8rll$6ra$1@dont-email.me> <fd04afe.jfak@rooftop.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
"owl" <owl@rooftop.invalid> wrote:
>
In comp.os.linux.advocacy
hanson <hanson@quick.net> wrote:
... correct, or having the coders at "Office Libre's Calc"
fix a long present glitch therein.
It appears in the Linux & the Windows versions:
>>>
Type the following sequence into the spreadsheet:
(letter/s) a, enter, b, enter, c, enter, .... z, enter.
You will notice that the entire alphabet returns correctly
EXCEPT for [ i ] (CHR$ 105) which appears as [ l ] (CHR$ 108)
>>>
"owl" wrote:
It's not 108. It's 73 ('I').
Autocorrect is changing it. Delete the autocorrect entry for "i".
>
hanson wrote:
Thanks owl. You are a good man! I'll check it out.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux Advocates At Work Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-15 01:17 +0000
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 20:54 -0500
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-15 11:14 +0000
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 09:05 -0500
Re: Linux Advocates At Work "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-15 10:11 -0500
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 10:42 -0500
Re: Linux Advocates At Work tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-15 11:15 +0100
"Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-15 08:58 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-15 16:04 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-15 10:15 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-15 16:25 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-15 10:32 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-15 17:08 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 16:00 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-15 22:19 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-15 16:32 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 00:22 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-16 01:41 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 13:00 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-16 11:18 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 12:25 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Lester Thorpe <lt@zen.info> - 2016-02-15 23:57 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-16 01:02 +0100
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:07 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:45 -0500
There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 11:24 -0800
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 13:00 -0800
Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 16:52 -0500
Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 16:50 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 17:29 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 06:44 -0600
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 16:50 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0000
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 23:00 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 23:23 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-20 08:23 -0800
Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-17 15:34 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-16 21:21 +0000
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 21:13 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 02:28 +0000
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:33 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-16 12:38 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-16 18:51 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-16 14:35 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-17 01:36 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-17 01:49 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-17 10:02 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-17 06:11 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 00:40 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-02-16 07:21 -0800
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 07:44 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 12:32 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 18:52 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 13:42 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 22:14 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 19:42 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-15 16:30 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 00:23 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-16 01:40 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 10:08 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-16 16:18 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 10:29 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 09:33 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-16 11:22 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 15:55 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-02-15 23:07 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-16 12:36 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:43 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 08:43 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-16 11:26 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 19:39 +0000
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 06:27 -0500
csiph-web