Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #343755
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.free.newsservers |
| Subject | Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. |
| Date | 2016-02-16 16:52 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <na05go$56v$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <0PHwy.64031$J36.25043@fx09.iad> <n9vjhc$prl$1@dont-email.me> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16{11.24A.Seattle.2016}> <na00et$h0b$1@dont-email.me> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16{1.00P.Seattle.2016}> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote in message
news:Jeff-Relf.Me@Feb.16{1.00P.Seattle.2016}...
> You (MrEzekiel) replied (to me):
>> > Most cell phones can't handle WiFi properly,
>> > even when 15 feet from the WiFi source.
>> > Notebooks/Consoles are better, desktops are best.
>>
>> Never had a problem with the phone Wifi.
>> My desktop has a wired connection.
>
> The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK, but others don't;
> even so, it's not great -- I wouldn't use it.
> A desktop with a decent WiFi adaptor works well.
What's not working? I can tether my laptop through my phone to do SSH port
forwarding. If this works then I'd expect just about everything else to work
with phone wifi.
>> > Ben Jacoby intentionally avoids facts and logic.
>> > In his little dream world, I'm not the manager
>> > of a 32 unit apartment building (nor a C++ programmer).
>>
>> 32 units is a lot.
>> Do you get a lot of people complaining about stuff?
>
> All day, every day.
> I move people into/out_of units; lots of turnover.
> I do most of the work myself, without help.
I owned more than one house in the past and did 95% of the work myself.
There's always plenty of work to do. You have 32 units and at least that
many tenants. I only had a wife and 4 kids and that was plenty to keep me
busy.
> Minimum wage, here in Seattle, is #13/hour this year,
> $15/hour next year. Parking is $120/month.
> Gas is $2.50/callon, I think (I don't drive).
I don't drive nearly as much as I used to so my gas bill is practically
nothing. The monthly train pass is $75 but the company pays for it. I paid
for the gas myself.
>> > There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here,
>> > and not enough Linuses.
>>
>> In the entire world there are many more Richard Stallmans
>> than people like Linus making $10M a year.
>
> I don't expect everyone here to be rich;
> but, also, I don't expect them to think like Richard Stallman.
>
>> > CraigsList allows a limited set of HTML tags,
>> > as do many other forums; HTML is not a crime.
>> > My posts begin:
>> >
>> > <h2><PRE Style='Font-Family: OCR A, monospace !important;'>
>>
>> I've listed stuff on CL before. You just type or copy-paste the tags into
>> the edit box. You don't use your newsreader for that do you?
>
> My CraigsList posts begin:
>
> <h2><pre>
>
> That's it, nothing more (HTML-wise).
> I just type it in. My current ad:
>
> http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/roo/5414506921.html
>
>> HTML is not a crime.
>> Web sites with excessive javascript should be.
>
> If I like a site, I whitelist some of its JavaScript servers,
> and I write CSS rules for it; to wit:
>
> http://Jeff-Relf.Me/userContent.CSS.TXT
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Linux Advocates At Work Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-15 01:17 +0000
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-14 20:54 -0500
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-15 11:14 +0000
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 09:05 -0500
Re: Linux Advocates At Work "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-15 10:11 -0500
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-15 10:42 -0500
Re: Linux Advocates At Work tinus61 <tinus61@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-15 11:15 +0100
"Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-15 08:58 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-15 16:04 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-15 10:15 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-15 16:25 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-15 10:32 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-15 17:08 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 16:00 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-15 22:19 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-15 16:32 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 00:22 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-16 01:41 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 13:00 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-16 11:18 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 12:25 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Lester Thorpe <lt@zen.info> - 2016-02-15 23:57 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-16 01:02 +0100
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:07 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 11:45 -0500
There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 11:24 -0800
Re: There are too many "Richard Stallmans" here. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 15:26 -0500
The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 13:00 -0800
Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 16:52 -0500
Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2016-02-16 16:50 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-16 17:29 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-17 06:44 -0600
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 16:50 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 20:58 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-20 05:59 +0000
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 23:00 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-19 23:23 -0800
Re: Most phones have trouble connecting to WiFi. "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2016-02-20 08:23 -0800
Re: The latest iPhones handle WiFi OK -- but I wouldn't use it. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yacht_master.fake> - 2016-02-17 15:34 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-16 21:21 +0000
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 21:13 -0500
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2016-02-17 02:28 +0000
Re: Linus Torvalds' Annual Salary: $10 Million Per Year. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 22:33 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-16 12:38 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2016-02-16 18:51 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-16 14:35 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Fabian Russell <fb@zen.info> - 2016-02-17 01:36 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" flatfish+++ <flatfish@myself.com> - 2016-02-17 01:49 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-17 10:02 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2016-02-17 06:11 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 00:40 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2016-02-16 07:21 -0800
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 07:44 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 12:32 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 18:52 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 13:42 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 22:14 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 19:42 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-15 16:30 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Dr. John Grubor" <grubor@grubor.org.invalid> - 2016-02-16 00:23 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-16 01:40 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 10:08 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2016-02-16 16:18 +0100
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 10:29 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 09:33 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-16 11:22 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 15:55 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2016-02-15 23:07 +0000
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" Slimer <a.m@unseen.is.invalid> - 2016-02-16 12:36 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2016-02-16 13:43 -0500
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2016-02-16 08:43 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2016-02-16 11:26 -0600
Re: "Who actually develops Linux? The answer might surprise you" ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2016-02-16 19:39 +0000
Re: Linux Advocates At Work Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-02-15 06:27 -0500
csiph-web