Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #16933

Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird?

Path	csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.software.thunderbird
Subject	Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird?
Date	Wed, 11 Jun 2025 22:49:14 +0200
Organization	Tschorkauer Zwetschgen-Pressen-Museum
Message-ID	<6849EBCA.2040703@backwurst.de> (permalink)
References	<102a9p9$1gkaf$1@dont-email.me> <102ad83$1htk3$1@dont-email.me> <102af8n$1eu8l$2@dont-email.me> <matengF5i42U1@mid.individual.net> <102ceoi$1vpkv$1@dont-email.me> <102ckmp$25f83$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Info	solani.org; logging-data="724188"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent	Pillepalle
Cancel-Lock	sha1:3nBmj8XOmAHItXgud2vDht076m4=
In-Reply-To	<102ckmp$25f83$1@dont-email.me>
X-User-ID	eJwFwQEBACAIA7BKovyHOKLYP4IbFo1HTtDx8LT99HAwZmcwS3avnonVlSGM2BadtlZOFT4RsRBk
Xref	csiph.com alt.comp.software.thunderbird:16933

Show key headers only | View raw

Paul wrote:
> On Wed, 6/11/2025 1:35 PM, sticks wrote:
>> On 6/11/2025 8:30 AM, s|b wrote:
>>> On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 18:31:35 -0500, sticks wrote:
>>>
>>>> just search X-face.  It's the dumbest thing ever for usenet IMO.
>>>
>>> What about Face header then?
>> 
>> What about it?
> 
> What I got here, is one was color and one was B&W.
[..snip..]
> Things like this are so archaic at times, it's hard to find a photo app
> to load them. The color one in this case, looks like it might be
> more authentic if the colors are inverted. I just happened to pick lousy
> looking samples :-) This does not appear to be a topic crying for a fix,
> because the artwork "mostly sucks" :-)
> 
> And Copilot was helpful, by pointing out "you could decode these yourself
> you know". I would pay $200 a month, to be encouraged in this way.
> 
> Some day the AI is going to answer "but you're too dumb to figure this out".

If you're using "Copilot" for stuff like this, maybe the AI would be right. ^^

Thread

x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? aRubes <aRubes@pm.me> - 2025-06-11 00:58 +0300
  Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-06-10 18:57 -0400
    Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-10 19:25 -0400
      Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-06-10 19:17 -0500
        Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-11 03:44 +0200
          Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Bob Henson <bob.henson@outlook.com> - 2025-06-11 10:46 +0100
        Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Bob Henson <bob.henson@outlook.com> - 2025-06-11 10:37 +0100
          Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-06-11 09:31 -0500
    Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-10 18:31 -0500
      Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-10 21:46 -0400
      Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-11 15:30 +0200
        Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-11 12:35 -0500
          Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-11 15:16 -0400
            Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-11 22:49 +0200
              Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-11 18:52 -0400
                Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-12 01:12 +0200
            Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-11 16:04 -0500
          Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-11 21:32 +0200
            Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-11 16:02 -0500
              Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-11 23:19 -0400
                Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-11 22:46 -0500
              Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-13 19:12 +0200
    Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-11 01:37 +0200
  Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-11 01:44 +0200
  Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-06-11 12:27 -0400
    Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-11 19:27 +0200
      Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-06-12 15:05 -0400

csiph-web