Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #16928
| From | Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
| Subject | Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? |
| Date | 2025-06-11 12:27 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <XnsB2FB7EB62D115nilch1@wheedledeedle.moc> (permalink) |
| References | <102a9p9$1gkaf$1@dont-email.me> |
On 10 Jun 2025, aRubes <aRubes@pm.me> wrote in alt.comp.software.thunderbird: > I am seeing some nice Gravatar / libravatar user icons via > extensions. Wondered whether the old (but cool) way is something > still doable, and how do you achieve it If your news agent can add custom headers, you can add an X-face image. But I don't think Thunderbird or many other readers will display it. My old buddy, Xnews can see them, although I remember I had to tweak it a little to do so. I've got an X-face that I set up, like, 20 years ago, but almost nobody can see it. I had even forgotten it was there, until someone mentioned it recently!
Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? aRubes <aRubes@pm.me> - 2025-06-11 00:58 +0300
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-06-10 18:57 -0400
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-10 19:25 -0400
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-06-10 19:17 -0500
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-11 03:44 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Bob Henson <bob.henson@outlook.com> - 2025-06-11 10:46 +0100
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Bob Henson <bob.henson@outlook.com> - 2025-06-11 10:37 +0100
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2025-06-11 09:31 -0500
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-10 18:31 -0500
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-10 21:46 -0400
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-11 15:30 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-11 12:35 -0500
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-11 15:16 -0400
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-11 22:49 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-11 18:52 -0400
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-12 01:12 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-11 16:04 -0500
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-11 21:32 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-11 16:02 -0500
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-06-11 23:19 -0400
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2025-06-11 22:46 -0500
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-13 19:12 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-11 01:37 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Frank Miller <miller@posteo.ee> - 2025-06-11 01:44 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-06-11 12:27 -0400
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2025-06-11 19:27 +0200
Re: x-face / face still a thing in Thunderbird? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-06-12 15:05 -0400
csiph-web