Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #181378
| From | ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-11, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? |
| Date | 2025-01-15 10:28 -0700 |
| Organization | windowsunplugged.com |
| Message-ID | <vm8r81$31obt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <vm4c1d$23r16$1@dont-email.me> <vm4dgp$241k2$1@dont-email.me> <vm4moa$291bp$1@dont-email.me> <vm5e9e$2cc48$1@dont-email.me> <vm5pjr$2ebjq$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Newyana2 wrote on 1/14/25 6:43 AM: > On 1/14/2025 5:28 AM, ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ wrote: > >> Yes, as you've found there are tweaks/utilities for the QL Bar on Win11. >> >> QL demise/deperecation reasons >> - Old Vista era code retained in Win10 for backward compatibility >> - Based on integration with IE bits(also deprecated in Win11 even >> though Edge still supports limited IE mode). >> > > That makes some sense in theory. I can see how they'd think > it was "progress" to remove more of IE. As we all know, the theory behind what MSFT thinks/does/ is a mixture of variation - deprecation, testing in the consumer market, cost reduction(expense, labor, support), nomenclature, internal politics(power - development vs. marketing), etc. The latter - impacting mearly everything in the released product since Windows 8.0. - i.e. questioning why in the consumer arena has been reasonably the same for years => futile exercise and knowing that answers to those questions are slim to negligible. -- ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-13 21:42 +0000
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-13 17:45 -0500
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 07:00 +0000
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Hank Rogers <invalid@nospam.com> - 2025-01-15 07:56 +0000
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 10:12 -0700
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 10:54 -0700
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 18:10 +0000
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-01-15 03:30 -0500
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-13 16:54 -0600
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Windows 11 24H2 User <fvgtgfrf@juiklopjhy.com> - 2025-01-13 22:40 +0000
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? john@jeasonNoSpam.cix.co.uk (John K.Eason) - 2025-01-14 00:41 +0000
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 03:52 -0700
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? john@jeasonNoSpam.cix.co.uk (John K.Eason) - 2025-01-14 12:05 +0000
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 12:39 -0700
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 07:00 +0000
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-13 19:45 -0500
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-13 19:09 -0600
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-13 22:48 -0500
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-14 03:28 -0700
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Newyana2 <newyana@invalid.nospam> - 2025-01-14 08:43 -0500
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? ...w¡ñ§±¤ñ <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2025-01-15 10:28 -0700
Re: Win10 -> 11 upgrade path? Ken Blake <Ken@invalid.news.com> - 2025-01-14 10:05 -0700
csiph-web