Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #627633
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Ehrenfest paradox |
| Date | 2024-01-23 09:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <l19cgtFs5mhU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (24 earlier) <l11iejFdtelU1@mid.individual.net> <uojpgr$b1e4$2@dont-email.me> <l16g11Fbr3oU1@mid.individual.net> <uom8jc$qsgr$1@dont-email.me> <l17qjuFjlmrU1@mid.individual.net> |
Am 22.01.2024 um 19:31 schrieb Athel Cornish-Bowden: > On 2024-01-22 17:28:11 +0000, Volney said: >>> >>> I had ciriticised this, because I had the role of a professor, who >>> had to write corrections for the homework of a student (Albert >>> Einstein in this case) and have a policy of formal striktness. >> >> Remember, that stupidity of your "corrections" was shot down in >> flames, repeatedly. Only a few of your zillion "corrections" were >> looked at by anyone, but every single one was either not incorrect, >> your own mistake or lack of understanding, weird terminology mistakes >> by you (saying segment AB must be A*B for example) or an unnecessary >> complication where a simple distance between two points becomes vector >> analysis. I would say your overcomplication of the AB distance has >> every single one of those mistakes of yours. >> >> This paper has been examined under a microscope, both by cranks and >> actual physicists. The only real "mistake" was saying a clock at the >> equator ran slower than a clock at the north pole, and that's because >> Einstein hadn't discovered GR yet. And there's some awkward language, >> which, if I recall, you didn't even notice. > > Not surprising in someone who hasn't understood yet not to set off a > defining clause with a comma in English (unlike German): "I had the role > of a professor, who had to write corrections for the homework". I wince > every time I see one of Thomas Heger's incorrect commas. I don't > complain about "ciriticised" (obviously a typo) or "striktness" (a > spelling error that any German speaker might make). Well, I would like to see YOU writing in a second language without the assistence of a spell-checker. (Unfortunately there are no more updates available for this version of thunderbird, which is the last one, that runs under Windows VISTA). So, try some German and let me correct your posts in my own language. In case of commas: well, yes, maybe you are right. But I use mostly 'comma-logic' from German, even if that is not quite correct. .. > As for the whole sentence, I am continually amazed that crackpots (not > just Thomas Heger -- also "Dr." Hachel, Lou, patdolan, etc.) see > themselves as professors qualified to "correct" Einstein's "errors". > I had written these annotations as means to pack into one file the arguments against those of the regular 'Dono'. He had attacked me and call me (like you ) 'crackpot' or similar. I had dared to say, that Einstein's text is full of errors. Since Dono didn't believe me, I had to mark all the (400+) errors in it. In case you like to defend Einstein's text, you simply need to disprove my 400+ comments (or at least a few). But you will most likely fail, because most tries to disprove any of my arguments failed sofar. Not all, because I made some errors, too. But since I had removed my own errors and polished the annotations a bit, you will have a hard time to find anything fault in them. I case you like to try that anyhow, you would make me quite happy. So: here comes the text of Einstein with my annotations: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RkhX-B5u7X4ga0QH-C53RddjQGctZVdo/view You need to download it to your own computer, because google does not show the annotations in the online version. If you find any error, then please let me know. TH >
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-14 07:23 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-14 16:26 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Gus Bähr Schultheiß <igsu@ybonrurg.dd> - 2024-01-14 19:49 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-14 18:50 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-15 00:14 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-01-15 01:17 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-15 00:51 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-15 08:12 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-15 13:37 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-16 09:37 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-16 20:37 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-17 18:46 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-15 15:42 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-16 09:44 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-01-16 11:59 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-16 03:31 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Reid Chu Foong <cdiu@ceehueru.cn> - 2024-01-17 11:47 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-17 19:02 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-17 12:38 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-18 07:45 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-18 14:32 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-18 09:15 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-19 11:39 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Barbaro Bertrand Jacqueline <bndd@abrnarat.fr> - 2024-01-19 17:52 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-19 18:56 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 14:45 -0600
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Raydel Walentowicz Dubanowski <naar@lrcllolo.pl> - 2024-01-20 12:34 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-20 22:02 -0600
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Trejo Metrofanis Demarchis <omef@osjrirea.gr> - 2024-01-21 10:16 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 14:42 -0600
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Leighton Accorso Passerini <oong@aacrncog.it> - 2024-01-19 22:56 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-20 10:39 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-21 00:31 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-21 08:00 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-21 14:05 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-21 13:58 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-22 07:28 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-22 12:28 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-22 19:31 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-22 20:51 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity contains a HUGE Loophole. Its Implications Can't Be Ignored. PNA <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 02:58 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-23 11:58 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 09:07 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-23 19:11 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-23 23:25 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-24 08:29 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-23 22:11 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-24 00:55 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 23:28 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-24 08:33 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2024-01-22 14:08 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-23 09:47 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-23 11:21 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-23 11:23 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 05:33 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2024-01-23 19:26 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-24 08:10 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-24 09:29 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-18 00:06 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-18 07:52 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-19 11:37 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-21 08:02 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-21 13:51 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-22 07:34 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-22 12:40 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-23 09:53 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-23 11:51 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-24 08:15 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Archie Rusnak Dunajski <circ@rkuuarka.pl> - 2024-01-19 16:01 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 12:31 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Levon Havroshin Babenkov <ahoo@enioheno.ru> - 2024-01-16 13:25 +0000
csiph-web