Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #627338
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Ehrenfest paradox |
| Date | 2024-01-16 09:44 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <l0mtoiF3vrbU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <l0hcnnF2ujoU1@mid.individual.net> <uo1s0i$knh3$2@dont-email.me> <uo1tih$krg5$1@dont-email.me> <l0k3ueFi4h1U1@mid.individual.net> <uo45bl$12mia$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 15.01.2024 um 21:42 schrieb Volney: > On 1/15/2024 2:12 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 15.01.2024 um 01:17 schrieb Python: >> ... >>>>> >>>>> A major error of Einstein and SRT is the use of watches per se. >>>>> >>>>> The problem is, that light has finite velocity, even if light is very >>>>> fast. >>>>> >>>>> But this finite velocity of light would make remote watches look >>>>> seemingly too late (by the time the signals of light take to travel >>>>> from the watch to the observer). >>>>> >>>>> Now it would be a VERY (!!!) stupid idea to compensate this >>>>> difference and adjust one of the clocks, that there is seemingly no >>>>> deleay. >>>>> >>>>> Instead the delay had to be measured and added to the time seen at >>>>> the remote clock. >>>>> >>>> That's exactly how Einstein's clock synchronization method works. It >>>> takes into account the time it takes for a signal to get from the >>>> local clock to the remote clock and the time it takes for a signal to >>>> get from the remote clock to the local clock. >>>> >>> >>> This has been shown to Thomas several times, his misunderstanding of >>> paragraph I.1 of Einstein paper is abysmal. He's sticking on the >>> idiotic claim that if delay is not mentioned then it means that delay >>> is ignored... Ironically enough Hachel's claim is that delay should be >>> ignored... Cranks are insufferable... >> >> >> This is wrong, because Einstein didn't mention the delay with a single >> word anywhere in 'On the electrodynamics of moving bodies'!!! > > In the formula TA' = TA + 2AB/c, what do you think the AB/c term means? > Where does the 2 come from? I know, of course, what that equation means. A is a point in space and B is a point in space. The signal starts from A in direction of B, gets reflected there and reaches A again. 2AB/c is incorrect, because a scalar-product of a position vector A and a position vector B is not a distance. But distance from A to B was obviously meant. Is it to hard to require a line on top of AB from a professional physicist? ... Besides of this: Einstein had to have written: this term 2AB/c means e.g. 'the delay of the signal from A towards B, reflected there and reaching the origin again' (or something equivalent). Just an equation (and a wrong one in this case) is not a statement. TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-04 08:23 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-04 10:05 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-05 07:26 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <r.hachel@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-05 12:33 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-06 08:47 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-08 20:07 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-09 07:20 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-09 12:28 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-10 09:53 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-10 14:05 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-14 07:23 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-14 16:26 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Gus Bähr Schultheiß <igsu@ybonrurg.dd> - 2024-01-14 19:49 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-14 18:50 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-15 00:14 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-01-15 01:17 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-15 00:51 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-15 08:12 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-15 13:37 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-16 09:37 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-16 20:37 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-17 18:46 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-15 15:42 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-16 09:44 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Python <python@invalid.org> - 2024-01-16 11:59 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-16 03:31 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-17 07:58 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Reid Chu Foong <cdiu@ceehueru.cn> - 2024-01-17 11:47 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-17 19:02 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-17 12:38 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-18 07:45 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-18 14:32 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-18 09:15 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-19 11:39 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Barbaro Bertrand Jacqueline <bndd@abrnarat.fr> - 2024-01-19 17:52 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-19 18:56 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 14:45 -0600
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Raydel Walentowicz Dubanowski <naar@lrcllolo.pl> - 2024-01-20 12:34 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-20 22:02 -0600
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Trejo Metrofanis Demarchis <omef@osjrirea.gr> - 2024-01-21 10:16 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 14:42 -0600
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Leighton Accorso Passerini <oong@aacrncog.it> - 2024-01-19 22:56 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-20 10:39 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-21 00:31 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-21 08:00 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-21 14:05 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-21 13:58 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-22 07:28 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-22 12:28 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-22 19:31 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-22 20:51 +0000
Re: Einstein's Relativity contains a HUGE Loophole. Its Implications Can't Be Ignored. PNA <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 02:58 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-23 11:58 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 09:07 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-23 19:11 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-23 23:25 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Richard Hachel <pourquoi-pas@tiscali.fr> - 2024-01-23 22:11 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2024-01-22 14:08 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-23 09:47 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-23 11:21 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Athel Cornish-Bowden <me@yahoo.com> - 2024-01-23 11:23 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 05:33 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Laurence Clark Crossen <l.c.crossen@hotmail.com> - 2024-01-23 19:26 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-18 00:06 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-18 07:52 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-19 11:37 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-21 08:02 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-21 13:51 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-22 07:34 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-22 12:40 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2024-01-23 09:53 +0100
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2024-01-23 11:51 -0500
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Archie Rusnak Dunajski <circ@rkuuarka.pl> - 2024-01-19 16:01 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2024-01-19 12:31 -0800
Re: Ehrenfest paradox Levon Havroshin Babenkov <ahoo@enioheno.ru> - 2024-01-16 13:25 +0000
Re: Ehrenfest paradox nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2024-01-09 15:07 +0100
csiph-web