Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ????????????

From	Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com>
Newsgroups	alt.free.newsservers, comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, news.software.readers, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject	Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ????????????
Date	2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<kkc53m$dij$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References	(5 earlier) <CD8E04CD.19097%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{19.51.Seattle.2013}> <CD8E1CBD.190AC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <kkbhqd$jst$2@reader1.panix.com> <CD8EDC33.1914A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> On 4/13/13 5:07 AM, in article kkbhqd$jst$2@reader1.panix.com, "Gary
> Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote:
> 
>> In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>> On 4/12/13 7:51 PM, in article Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{19.51.Seattle.2013},
>>> "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> ??
>>>> Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".
>>>> 
>>>> It is text, by the way, not video.
>>>> If someone posts videos, and you don't like it, don't read those posts.
>>>> 
>>>> YOU decide what to read, not your NNTP server.
>>>> 
>>> It has already been established you do not get the concept of a Usenet text
>>> forum. Not sure why you keep harping on the fact.
>>> 
>> 1. Jeff is a dope.
>> 2. Jeff, in tis case, is right.
>> C. That makes you dumber than a dope.
> 
> Most Usenet forums are considered pure text...

First, git, its not Usenet, its The USENet.  
Second, they're not Usenet forums, they are newsgroups.
Third, while many are text, the majority, unfortunately, are binary.  

> and, yes, of course HTML is a text format as well,
> but it is rendered by a web browser.

Which has nothing to do with the statement that it's not up to your provider to filter that FOR you.

> 
> If you want to use a web discussion group that is fine by my. But that is
> not what Usenet is.
> 
Ignorant git, you use User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206
I use tin, a fucking UNIX TEXT READER.   

You are a pissant, thinking you know something. I'm an administrator, fairly
well versed in USENET. (Check around)
Lastly, you're a fucking kook and I'm the current FNVW. 


Git.

 

-- 
gburnore at Panix dot Com 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ?????????????????????????????????
                                      |  ?????????????????????????????????
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|  ?????????????????????????????????
                                      |  ?? 0 1 7 2 3 / ??? 3 7 4 9 3 0 o?
Bronx Division                        |     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
    "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
        Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
          Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
            Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
              Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
                Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
                Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
              Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
            Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
                Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
                Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
                Usenet is a form of email.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
                [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
                Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
                What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
                Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
                I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
                Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
                Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
                I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
                I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
                Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ï»¿ï»¿ Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
    Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
      Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
      Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
        Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
          Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
            Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400

csiph-web