Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #173399
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, news.software.readers, alt.usenet.kooks |
| Subject | Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. |
| Date | 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CD8F52AE.1922B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <kk8jeq$fep$1@news.albasani.net> <MPG.2bd1d02f55424e8664@news.alt.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{10.26.Seattle.2013}> <CZlat.519422$O02.99584@newsfe18.iad> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.13{18.14.Seattle.2013}> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
On 4/13/13 6:14 PM, in article Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.13{18.14.Seattle.2013},
"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:
> Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.
D¡§åg®èè¡πg w¡†h ÿ◊ú® p◊¡π† åπ∂ π◊† §èè¡πg ¡† å®è π◊† †hè §åmè †h¡πg.
> I do NOT post via "eternal-september", of course.
∆®è ÿ◊ú åßÏè †◊ π◊† p◊§† ƒ®◊m åπÿ ◊†hè® §◊ú®çè, †◊◊?
> "eternal-september", is popular only because it's "cost-free";
> so long as it's free, "basement dwellers" endure the many agendas
> the sysop ( namely, Ray Banana ) imposes on them.
†h¡§ ¡§ ÿ◊ú® ◊p¡π¡◊π. ∏◊† ◊πè ◊ƒ åπÿ √åÏúè ¡π mÿ √¡èw.
> When the topic presents itself, I point out how wrong it is
> to operate a "cost-free" server for the sole purpose of censoring those,
> like me, who use "<A> tags" ( i.e. HTML links, simple text, not videos ).
†hè ¡∂èå †hå† †h¡§ ¡§ h¡§ §◊Ïè pú®p◊§è ¡§ åߧú®∂.
> Now, if you think such censorship is a good thing,
> where one man answers "the HTML question" for the masses...
> well... then you're not as nearly smart as I once thought.
£èå®π å Ï¡††Ïè åß◊†ú Û§èπè† ßèƒ◊®è ÿ◊ú kèèp g◊¡πg ◊π. †håπk§!
--
"Blocking adolescents’ access to porn, or keeping them ignorant of sex in
any way, is likely to stunt their emotional growth and make them vulnerable
to mistakes that can hurt them badly." -- Richard Stallman
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
Usenet is NOT "pure text". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
Usenet is a form of email. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
[NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400
csiph-web