Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #173269
| From | Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.free.newsservers, comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, news.software.readers, alt.usenet.kooks |
| Subject | Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? |
| Date | 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <kkc6op$qcn$2@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{19.51.Seattle.2013}> <CD8E1CBD.190AC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{22.22.Seattle.2013}> <CD8EDBB1.19149%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <kkc616$jhp$1@pcls6.std.com> |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
In alt.usenet.kooks Michael Moroney <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>
>>On 4/12/13 10:22 PM, in article Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{22.22.Seattle.2013},
>>"Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:
>
>>> ?
>>> Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.
>>>
>>> You (Mr. "Snit") are reading an HTML post rught now;
>>> and you've been replying to them, no problem.
>>>
>>> Perhaps you think Usenet should be ( but isn't )
>>> VASTLY different than emails; if so, I don't agree with you.
>>>
>>> <A> tags are NOT devil's spawn; it's MUCH more innocent than that.
>>> Again: YOU decide what to read, don't let your sysop make that call.
>>>
>>Again: you are showing you do not really understand text-based Usenet
>>discussions. Why do you keep harping on your ignorance about this. Let it
>>go.
>
> I think it's much more than not understanding how text-based Usenet
> is supposed to work. My personal opinion is that he has some form of
> antisocial personality disorder, that is, he doesn't care about the wants
> or needs of others.
You're right on that. But little nit snit is just as whacky.
Relf will whine wherever he goes. Snit the git just needs to wise up and
stop firing at everything without READING it.
--
gburnore at Panix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ?????????????????????????????????
| ?????????????????????????????????
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| ?????????????????????????????????
| ?? 0 1 7 2 3 / ??? 3 7 4 9 3 0 o?
Bronx Division | Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
Usenet is NOT "pure text". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
Usenet is a form of email. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
[NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ? Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
Re: Usenet is a form of email. cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? " Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400
csiph-web