Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ????????????

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	alt.free.newsservers, comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, news.software.readers, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject	Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ????????????
Date	2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
Message-ID	<CD908CA8.192C8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <y6udneYaEY1MsPbMnZ2dnUVZ_gmdnZ2d@bresnan.com> <CD908302.192B9%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <kkfcha$8kn$1@reader1.panix.com> <CD908746.192C3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <kkfel3$70c$1@reader1.panix.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/14/13 4:38 PM, in article kkfel3$70c$1@reader1.panix.com, "Gary
Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote:

> In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 4/14/13 4:02 PM, in article kkfcha$8kn$1@reader1.panix.com, "Gary
>> Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>>>> I miss him.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Has all become clear now?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I used to be a cola nut, till I came to my senses.
>>>>> 
>>>> Does not mean you are not still a nut in COLA, you might just be a
>>>> different
>>>> type. :)
>>>> 
>>>>> I now use win7 on a nice high powered PC.  Very nice indeed.  I've had too
>>>>> many problems with linux and just got tired of going on one of those
>>>>> scavenger hunts hunting down missing libraries.
>>>>> 
>>>> I think the bottom line is different solutions fit different needs and
>>>> tastes
>>>> best. I personally use OS X, Windows, and Linux (used them all today, in
>>>> fact). Just depends on what is going to serve me best. I think anyone who
>>>> tells you Solution X [1] is always best is trying to sell you something.
>>> 
>>> Liar.
>> 
>> While I know you will never give an honest answer, I am curious why you go so
>> far out of your way to place yourself in a poor light.
> 
> No, k00k, you don't or you'd stop.  That is, after all, why you are where you
> are.
> 
> Remember, you're ignoring me.

Thank you for making it clear: you are not *capable* of showing yourself in
a better light. This truly is you, at your best.

A shame. A real shame.

-- 
Proof Brad cc Wiggins is clueless about his Xerox claims:
<http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b8aa8b17d0a6dfde>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
    "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
        Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
          Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
            Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
              Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
                Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
                Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
              Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
            Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
                Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
                Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
                Usenet is a form of email.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
                [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
                Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
                What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
                Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
                I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
                Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
                Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
                I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
                I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
                Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ï»¿ï»¿ Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
    Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
      Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
      Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
        Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
          Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
            Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400

csiph-web