Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #173278

Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ????????????

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In alt.usenet.kooks Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 13, 12:03??pm, Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 4/13/13 10:52 AM, in article kkc616$jh...@pcls6.std.com, "Michael
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Moroney" <moro...@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote:
>> > Snit <use...@gallopinginsanity.com> writes:
>>
>> >> On 4/12/13 10:22 PM, in article Jeff-Relf...@Apr.12{22.22.Seattle.2013},
>> >> "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:
>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.
>>
>> >>> You (Mr. "Snit") are reading an HTML post rught now;
>> >>> and you've been replying to them, no problem.
>>
>> >>> Perhaps you think Usenet should be ( but isn't )
>> >>> VASTLY different than emails; if so, I don't agree with you.
>>
>> >>> <A> tags are NOT devil's spawn; it's MUCH more innocent than that.
>> >>> Again: YOU decide what to read, don't let your sysop make that call.
>>
>> >> Again: you are showing you do not really understand text-based Usenet
>> >> discussions. Why do you keep harping on your ignorance about this. Let it
>> >> go.
>>
>> > I think it's much more than not understanding how text-based Usenet
>> > is supposed to work. ??My personal opinion is that he has some form of
>> > antisocial personality disorder, that is, he doesn't care about the wants
>> > or needs of others. ??Everything should be his way and everyone else needs
>> > needs to change to his way, never the other way around. ??But I am not
>> > a psychiatrist, just a kookwatcher, so take this with a railcar full of
>> > salt.
>>
>> Oh, I suspect you are correct. I am reading this thread from COLA where such
>> personalities are very, very common.
> 
> Give your BS a rest for a bit...
> 
> 1- Adam Kesher: "Steve, IIRC Sandman's website has a member area and a
> login. If you forget your password, you can ask it to e-mail it to
> you, and a bot will send an e-mail. *That* is the e-mail Snit got from
> Sandman's website, and yes he's that fucked in the head and starved
> forattention that he'd claim it to be an e-mail from Sandman himself.
> So, don't get sucked into his little circus.  The e-mail, in this
> particular instance, did probably originate from Sandman.net."  27 Feb
> 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dac74355552b4cc7
> 
> 2- Alan Baker: "People's perceptions of you are *formed* by behaviour
> and not withstanding your occasional on topic posts, I wish you'd
> leave too. Please note that despite the amazing silliness that is
> Edwin, I have never made the same wish of him."  27 Feb 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4a7c3ebf3fc10221
> 
> 3- amicus_curious (COLA): "Where on earth do you get the idea that I
> am arguing with you, little man? Is your name "Hadron"? Shoo! Go back
> to your mail order business!"  29 May 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/00ee203fe6183b1b
> 
> 4- Andrew J. Brehm: "You are not flamed because you speak the truth,
> you are flamed because you are a hideous troll and keep disrupting the
> newsgroup."  27 Feb 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/52eab53a559e00ce
> 
> 5- AZ Nomad: "The fact that you routinely change your headers to
> weasel out of killfiles proves that you're an asshole."   25 Jun 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51b43d6c9613c9da
> 
> 6- Andy/news/nospam: "Why do you keep these things up, Snit? Why not
> just let them go away and show how responsible a member of CSMA you
> are? You could show your enemies up by being better than them, rise
> above the low level you so obviously dislike. Anything, just
> stop...."  26 Apr 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d6ffb6b06aa237e5
> 
> 7- B.B.: "Does the From: header contain the string "Snit"? If yes,
> then troll. Otherwise, maybe. Dunno why I had my KF on you set to
> expire, but it's fixed now."  13 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a98d179b2ff9578
> 
> 8- BaJoRi: "You know it, and I know it, and everyone else who has read
> your idiocy knows it. I took your statement, showed it to be wrong,
> then added even more, just to be a dick and REALLY show you to be a
> fool. You need to judiciously snip out pertinent points because you
> are an intellectually dwarfed turd-burglar."  11 Nov 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.vacation.las-vegas/msg/647944511b74b82f
> 
> 9- bobinnv: "I learned some time ago how much better this group can be
> if you kill file Snit. I have never understood why more people don't
> do the same.."  5 Aug 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0706dbef8ce1f903
> 
> 10- Bob B.: "This has always been pretty much a free-for-all group,
> but since Snit showed up, its become almost impossible to have a
> decent discussion about anything. The solution is to NOT REPLY TO
> SNIT. But for some reason, some people just can't stop feeding him."
> 27 Dec 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d2f1dff196ca190
> 
> 11- =C2=B0b=C2=B0 unny: Subject "snit makes me sad", Text "really
> actually = =3D:- (" 9 Oct 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4e31cb49c1e2d432
> 
> 12- Brian: "LOL, Has anyone ever been more universally hated on the
> USENET than Snit? Too bad he craves the hatred and negative attention.
> We will read about him in the news some day soon going on a shooting
> rampage. Somebody should get the pychopath some help before he VT's a
> bunch of people.  29 May 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/66a89e4f5c89f489
> 
> 13- buzz off: "Snit is obviously mentally ill, but you and Steve don't
> help. You encourage him to post, which he doesn't need to do. We would
> all be better off if you just ignore him.  17 Nov 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2ed879f256677548
> 
> 14- Carlo Coggi: "He must believe he is surrounded by 'trolls' ... in
> the groups he trolls in, that is.  I wondered if the idiotrollers like
> snit would reply to this thread. Of course, I didn't see his posts,
> only your reply".  07 Aug 2006 (available only in reply)
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5ea48f7a84115fd1
> 
> 15- C Lund: "Snit is not my responsibility. Maybe it's time for you to
> learn how to use your kill-filter. I am assuming, of course, that your
> Usenet browser has a kill-filter."  5 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2c390a34b05b24a9
> 
> 16- cc (COLA): "You are incapable of letting anything go. In fact, I
> guarantee you will respond to this post in under 3 hours. Hell, I'd be
> surprised if it takes longer than 30 minutes. If I really wanted to, I
> could make this little side topic go on forever, because you are a
> complete moron who just has to respond to anything written about or to
> you, even if it just means repeating yourself."  1 Feb 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/3712090033411605
> 
> 17- Chance Furlong: "HPT, Wally, Sandman, C Lund, Steve Carroll and
> Tim Adams are not trolls and do not troll. You, on the other hand, are
> a troll."  27 Aug 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/28c267f26965b43f
> 
> 18- Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "I try to go more by the contents of the
> posts. Although some clowns (e.g. Snit) spew out so much chaff it is
> not worth the effort." 14 Feb 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8b6a982957c7c9d5
> 
> Chris Ahlstrom (COLA): "Actually, many of the advocates are sick to
> death of Snit's never-ending puerile blather about trivialities.  The
> occasional reasonable conversations are too few and far between."  6
> Mar 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/811326833ba71864
> 
> 19- Chris Clement: "ugh....geez man.....let it go"  5 Jul 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ed093996df6547b2
> 
> 20- chrisv (cola): "No, she called him 'shit', and rightly so, for
> they way he was so ignominiously birthed into a toilet at the bus
> depot, and simply refused to die, despite repeated flushes.  It's now
> far too late to *flush* him, but we can still *plonk* him..."  12 Sep
> 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/18099f8aa067f4a5
> 
> 21- Code Orange: "Then why post it? What need is there for you to
> "win" an argument? They don't like you, you don't like them. Why must
> you keep this up? What results are you expecting?"
> 
> 22- CozmicDebris: "I'm done with your three year old games. The
> archives show my answers and your inability to process them. Keep
> posting your list and proving that you are an idiot troll. I will not
> address it any further- you being too stupid to realize and accept
> that is not my problem".  22 Nov 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.cellular.attws/msg/0aa65b7a132dbfe8
> 
> 23- cshenk: "I happen to believe him over you...  and I doubt I'd be
> the only person in this ng to do so. You have given people a lot of
> 'evidence' that you are dishonest... as 'evidenced' by the quotes
> list." .... "Why stop with Jonas? Why not call the entire list of
> people on your quotes list 'liars'? After all, they have all labeled
> you a liar, troll or worse."  27 Nov 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/909a59de04850ef5
> 
> 24- Dave Fritzinger: "[snip of stuff I really don't care to read]
> Snit, please go away. Get a life, meet a woman, do something, but
> please, please, please, GO AWAY!!!!"  2 Jun 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/57bb2fc42ec0f290
> 
> 25- Dawg Tail: "PC advocates, Mac advocates, Linux advocates. Almost
> all of them are making similar claims about Snit. When you have so
> many diverse people who share a common perception where do you think
> the problem lies? With Snit? Or almost everyone else? The answer
> doesn't require an advanced degree to figure out."  30 Dec 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/73edac32c3ad530b
> 
> 26- Donald L McDaniel: "Jesus, snit. You're a teacher. I thought you
> knew what a metaphor was, and could recognize one when it was
> presented to you. I guess I had too much confidence in you."  30 Nov
> 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3254ec7af27bfb0f
> 
> 27- ed: "snit, you continually amaze me with how much of a liar and
> loser you are. you may notice a semi-regular pattern with me where i
> stop responding to your posts for stretches at a time, then start up
> responding as if you were a normal person. i suppose it's tough for
> the magnitude of your 'loserdom' to stick, so it loses some of it's
> sharpness when i stop responding to you. you almost always start
> responding back in a semi normal way, but inevitably degenerate. it's
> once again that time. i can only ask that you pass my condolences to
> your wife and unborn child for having to put up with such a dishonest
> fool as yourself. (well, if your wife is a loser as well, just pass
> those condolences to the rug-rat to be; if not, double condolences to
> her). "  30 Apr 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/71f74dd6d806ce77
> 
> 28- Edward Stanfield: "Snit thinks the rules that apply to honest and
> honorable people apply to him.  That is absurd.  He is the biggest
> liar in Usenet history.  Mackay posted the email to prove Snit was
> using sock puppets and he still is.  Snit can not give up his socks
> puppets and shills.  They are the only ones who ever support him."  28
> Jan 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5b52494d96d12229
> 
> 29- Edwin: "You've got to be out of your mind, Snit. You're the worst
> troll this group has ever seen. You're a liar and a forger, and you've
> almost destroyed this group single-handedly. For you to post a list of
> out of context arguments, and lies, and forgeries about your enemies
> labled as a "peace effort" has to be one of the craziest stunts you've
> pulled. It's all about your sick need for attention, your need to be
> center stage at all times. You'd publicly eat dog turd if you thought
> it would make people look at you."  18 May 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/37e4a720619642a0
> 
> 30- Elijah Baley: "Seriously, Snit, you need psychiatric help. Go see
> a doctor."  24 Aug 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6f6c88356b54fc15
> 
> 31- Elizabot v2.0.2: "I see you were unable to respond to the points
> in my post and you are back to your repetitious regurgitation mode.
> How childishly typical of you, Snit."  16 Nov 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55214ccfb7414fe5
> 
> 32- Fa-groon: "I don't read Snit period. He's been killfiled since the
> first day I posted here. [....] I don't want to 'do like Snit'. As far
> as I'm concerned, Snit doesn't even exist."  15 Aug 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/dcfbff305ba8b7f0
> 
> 33- fibercut: "That is the problem. In the years I have been coming to
> CSMA I have seen in the past year a real hatred among people, besides
> the typical Mac vs. Windows typical argument. I feel that it is like
> being in a room of really young children trying there best to best the
> other person. The one common thing among all of this seems to be you.
> I hate to be like this, but facts are facts. You seem to be in the
> middle of a great percentage of arguments. CSMA has become less about
> Macs and more about "look everybody, I think he lied". Is there no end
> then all this picking at each other on such a personal level. CSMA has
> always been al little adversarial but you have personally crank it up
> to the point that this place is no longer fun. Congratulations on
> stopping CSMA and making this place your own personal circus."  12 Jan
> 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/bbe695bbc3424ab6
> 
> 34- Geezer: Snit: "Steve Carroll has no sense of morality" Geezer:
> "Whined the guy who cannot directly address those who uncover his lies
> and deceit;)" Snit: "and no clue about the law." Geezer: 'Said the guy
> who believes his unsupported opinions are "proof". LOL! (snip more of
> Snit's unsupported lies)'  1 Jan 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d0517ced5134934d
> 
> 35- Geoff M. Fitton (COLA): "The Prescott Computer Guy *still* showing
> how stupid he is... What a mar00n".  30 Aug 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f9401b4b57c59865
> 
> 36- George Graves: "Jason. You have started an argument with the Snit
> (AKA Michael Glasser), this should not be done. He will drive you
> crazy with his twisted logic, his deep-rooted need to be ALWAYS right
> at any cost. He will move goalposts, set up strawmen, and bore you
> into submission with his endless pedanticism. The only way to engage
> him is to hit and run. NEVER engage him, it's a futile, empty
> procedure that will only anger you and feed him. Take my advice and
> STAY AWAY!"   27 Oct 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3d3af33ce25a11fd
> 
> 37- gimme_this_gimme_that: "Hitting the vodka tonight Snit?"  4 Mar
> 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b457a7b378264794
> 
> 38- Glenn Hall (COLA): "That person is like a constantly running
> toilet that won't stop. Does he ever stop talking about UI
> consistency? No matter what anyone replies, he adds a few more
> branches to the spider web as it grows and grows. It's a waste of
> time."  31 Oct 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c8dd8a244fe1eb2c
> 
> 39- Greycloud: "You really shouldn't lie like that. Everyone else
> notices that you are not honest and you have no honor."  21 Jan 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3b92f11a1ab00f91
> 
> 40- H: "Your crappy posts are still showing up in seperate threads,
> are you doing this on purpose to piss people off? I dont ever censor
> people cause that's just retarded but if you dont fix it I'm gonna
> have to cause I dont wanna see your name 40 times in a row. So uh,
> change your client or something".  12 Sep 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f36ee6b458c86499
> 
> 41- Hadron (COLA): "Would you please stop the whining. FFS he has you
> jumping to his every post. How many more fucking times are you going
> to post the same repetitive garbage? Please ..at least change the
> record sometimes!!!!!!!"  13 Aug 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1e0ecbb776623473
> 
> 41- Hadron (COLA): "I'm not coming to the rescue of anyone. I have
> Snit killfiled for his repeated reposts of the same text time and time
> again."  24 Aug 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e99833d90612ee35
> 
> 41- Hadron (COLA): Snit: "Anyone who denies this is a part of the
> herd.  Period.  This is a simple black and white issue where there is
> no middle ground - anyone who lies to defend Stallman's repulsive
> support of child abuse *is* a part of the herd." Hadron: "Constantly
> posting this dirge about Stallman and his views is about to get you
> back in the killfile. Stop it. Its repulsive and vindictive on your
> part."  25 Sep 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/6be2e85c701763a7
> 
> 42- Henry Flam: "You on the other hand must be a deeply troubled
> individual who has a fragile ego. I needn't agree nor disagree with
> the points above. I don't care about them. Your constant complaints,
> whines, rages, etc., wars with the regular Mac advocates, whom you
> mislabel as trolls, arise from your sense that any conversation or
> thread must orbit around you. People have pointed that out to you but
> you don't accept that.  Snit I feel sorry for you. Please go and see a
> doctor about your solipsism. There must be a cure for you deep
> psychological travail." 18 Aug 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9bb48e6e6da75c8
> 
> 43- Heywood Mogroot: "*plonk*"  Aug 19 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d8afd909a308b97f
> 
> 44- -hh: 'Perversion has utterly nothing to do with the definition of
> "synonymous".  It is, however, a very clear example of how you attempt
> to maliciously debase against anyone who disagrees with you.  As such,
> I consider this to be a purposeful attempt by you to try to libel me.
> This is your only warning to consider rescinding your remark, with the
> reminder that you, and you alone are responsible for that accusation,
> both in the ethical as well as the full legal meaning of the word
> "responsible".'  25 Feb 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5496641a3426293a
> 
> 45- High Plains Thumper: "Agreed except for Snit and socks (Joe Crump
> and ad nauseum). I've got Snit kill binned, because he is the classic
> ad hominem troll. At first he seems reasonable, but then it always
> degrades into name calling bullying, the responder is a liar, etc. AKA
> the Snit Circus of Pathological Lies. Perhaps the times he seems
> reasonable are when he is properly controlled by medication."  21 Sep
> 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/249a598ec5aafe85
> 
> 46- Homer (COLA): "I don't mean this as a personal insult, but I'm
> perfectly serious when I say 'Snit' (Michael Glasser) is obviously
> mentally ill, and needs help.  I was going to suggest that someone
> alerts his wife to the problem, but I have to assume she's already
> aware of his condition, if she is in fact still living with him. It's
> possible, I suppose, that he's already undergoing counselling and/or
> on medication, but if he is then it doesn't seem to be helping much.
> Maybe he just missed his 'meds' today (again, I mean that
> sincerely)."  26 Jan 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e061874ea94e9ce8
> 
> Homer: "Word of advice for anyone concerned: don't be tempted to get
> drawn into a Snit circus, it's literally a waste of time. He's just an
> attention seeker who'll keep stringing you along, in a never-ending
> circle of obtuse questions, for which he has no genuine interest in
> the answers."  14 Oct 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0d06eb2e900e3058
> 
> 47- hophead: "I have been reading and occasionally posting to CSMA for
> a long time now, since 1995 at least. There have always been trolls
> and morons, but I've never seen anything quite so disruptive as the
> Snit circus. Snit will *never* back down or stop, and neither will
> most of his opponents.  A good kill file is your only hope."  20 Aug
> 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3161a78667e299eb
> 
> 48- Jamie Hart (cola): "It seems that since you are unable to offer
> support for your statements, you're reduced to personal attacks on me.
> Incidentally, anyone reading this post can see that I have offered no
> straw men, and have only asked you to explain how the things you state
> as facts can be true. I'm really sorry that you're taking this
> attitude, the topic is an interesting one and I thought you might have
> some insights. I've snipped the rest, since you dislike long posts and
> avoid answering any of the questions I asked by saying everything was
> just repeated."  6 Dec 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8e07cde31f4eecf6
> 
> 49- Jason McNorton: "You're one of the many, many paranoid people on
> usenet that should be confined most likely. You sit there and refresh
> your screen endlessly. You post the same nonsense over and over.
> Either you're a super troll, or you're a super mess."  1 Nov 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a8e091c0b248eb0
> 
> 50- JEDIDIAH (cola): "You're simply full of shit."  27 Feb 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cdddf5fd04d9afcb
> 
> 51- Jeff B.: "Yo, Snit. We're not pals. I think you're a git."  23 Dec
> 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0ec649345d433a2d
> 
> 52- Jeff Hoppe: "This is a Macintosh Advocacy newsgroup. Not a 12-step
> recovery plan. Your medical problems or conditions won't help me
> achieve a greater understanding of my Mac. In fact, it detracts from
> it and those kinds of discussions have no place in a newsgroup such as
> this." 18 Nov 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/947a2cc0301a2862
> 
> 53- Jesus: "Really, Snit. It's annoying. What are you accomplishing
> besides being annoying? Is that your goal?"  25 Apr 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e3d5029d34cde243
> 
> 54- Jim Lee Jr.: "Snit, read the thread's title, is Bush mentioned in
> it? You (and Carroll) ought to learn to stay on topic and not hijack
> threads."
> 
> 55- Jim Polaski: "Why is it that nearly every thread you're involved
> in seems like it turns into some tit-for-tat, dozens of responses to
> OT things and garbage? Cmon there Snit. Someone has to take the lead
> and stop this crap. Try. How about it?"  25 Apr 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b5c22490ab9649b
> 
> 56- Jim Richardson (cola): "And yet again, Snit runs away, rather than
> actually provide evidence for his claims. Par for the course I
> suppose."
> 
> "Evasion noted. Snit runs away again rather than produce evidence for
> his claims.  At least come up with some original insults Snit! I mean,
> you *are* capable of original thoughts! Right? Snit?"  8 Feb 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/e33321cc3343fc44
> 
> 57- Joey Jojo Junior Shabadoo: "and Snithead has even farther to fall
> - in a few weeks he'll be out on the street after midnight, yelling at
> passersby 'sucky sucky, $2...'"  23 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/57cf69f66571a5a7
> 
> 58- John C. Randolph: "You're nothing but a troll yourself. What are
> you bitching about?"  1 Dec 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12ba528be5ad2665
> 
> 59- JohnOfArc (cola): "I'm not sure "troll" does it justice- more like
> a black hole! But hey, if we all promise to never again even entertain
> an unkind thought re Apple, will you take it back and lock it up?
> Please??" 11 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e2891b1f3984e121
> 
> 60- John Q. Public: "I have not been bothered to read Snit's postings
> since I figured out who he is. I don't bother to filter his posts, I
> just consider the source and skip to the next one when I see his
> name." 7 Jan 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7d34c1bd05c877d2
> 
> 61- John Slade: "I don't get posts from Snit. I wouldn't be shocked
> that he has some kind of disorder. He made up stuff about being a
> computer repairman and teacher. He's just plain loony and best
> ignored. Let him deal with his disorder by medication. He's here to do
> one thing, get attention from people. He says the crazy stuff just to
> get a reaction. You say you like to beat him over the head. Well
> that's what he's counting on, he says stuff he knows isn't true in
> hopes to get a rise out of people like you. Ignore him, you won't
> regret it."  3 Apr 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/394a53a65c28d314
> 
> John Slade: "Snit, you have a enough problems as it is without adding
> drinking booze to the list. How the hell did you manage to get out of
> my killfile? Oh well back into the cage you go, PLONK."  13 Oct 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.food.wine/msg/992a796786a541d8
> 
> 62- Josh McKee: "I have no strawman so therefore it has to be in your
> mind. .... What is obnoxious are your posts."  26 Jul 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3665b9e002d27c44
> 
> 63- K E: "I haven't read this board for awhile but I see that even
> though the trolls still roam free at least the worst troll of the lot
> is mostly being ignored by readers on this bb. If the few stragglers
> that keep replying to him would just stop responding to Snit at all
> this place could be worth coming back to. There's a good chance he'll
> pack up and take his trolling to more fertile ground."  22 Oct 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0b9dca7df1f677f4
> 
> 64- KK: 'Whoa there, ad hominem man.  You started off your sentence
> with "Ah" like you'd just realized something profound.'  29 Oct 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.howard-stern/msg/6a89029a5b5be5f8
> 
> 65- Kelsey Bjarnason (cola): "Funny how you simply don't bother
> reading the posts that rip your entire thesis to bleeding gobbets of
> putrid excrescence. Maybe some day you'll learn how to support your
> position, instead of sticking your fingers in your ears and humming,
> hoping it'll all go away."  7 Mar 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/96d064a7a5c6074a
> 
> 66- Ku Karlovsky (cola): "You repeatedly chastise others for ad
> hominem attacks while in the same sentence make your own ad hominem
> attacks. You make silly claims and then avoid the subject of your
> silliness. You're a liar and a hypocrite and you always have been."
> 14 Jul 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d1e3f9ac5c72c6ee
> 
> 67- Lars Trager: "Yes, you are stupid."  7 Jan 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a9bedf6689f9a54f
> 
> 68- Lawrence D'Oliveiro (COLA): "You seem to be full of complaints
> about your inability to hold up your end of the argument,
> aren=E2=80=99t you?"  1= 6 Mar 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8ca5f48099696228
> 
> 69- Lefty Bigfoot: "Okay, I tried to put up with it for a long time,
> but the few times you post something worth reading just aren't worth
> it anymore. *plonk*"  16 Dec 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5520adae01120e83
> 
> 70- Liam Slider (cola): "Maybe he's responding to the fact you've been
> an annoying little fuckwit lately. You started out with the pretense
> of trying to be fair, but lately all there is from you in COLA is
> trashtalk about Linux and you acting every bit the troll."  16 Jul
> 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad7d6c42c5e4cf2f
> 
> 71-libcrushersmith: "Snit also thinks Dan Rather still anchors CBS
> News and that Gitmo terrorists are innocent!  Any time Snit is
> cornered, he changes the subject and will never admit he's wrong."  28
> Jan 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/fbc516717f3b7ccf
> 
> 72- libsnightmare: "You're a sore loser who has resorted to fifth
> grade tactics. How fucking sad - all this clown has left is to edit
> posts and post fake bullshit. You can't debate... so you lie. Once
> again, you have proved Steve Carroll right about you. Sad..."  4 May
> 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a80c93f80bd6bc3e
> 
> 73- Linonut (cola): "Snit may be the first retraction of my general
> killfile amnesty. The volume of cavilling, whining, foot-stomping,
> back-tracking, goal-post shifting, and petulance generated by that
> effete candy-ass beggars belief".  30 Aug 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/cc4827fd7e8ad574
> 
> 74- Lloyd Parsons: "Well, I don't know if Oxford is the most
> cretinous, I would think that would be reserved for Snit! ;-)"  18 Mar
> 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b6cd3ac4bf1e08d6
> 
> 75- Lewis: "hasn't this fight been going on for like 8 years now? I
> don't think anything is ever going to fix snit."  02 Mar 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/98ef8bca6b3a9b34
> 
> 76- Lusotec (COLA): "You can't resist being a liar, it is
> pathological, just like you can't resist trolling these forums day
> after day, week after week, month after month, year after year, decade
> after decade. A pathetic waste of life." Jun 20 2012
> 
> https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b3d29c146414f077
> 
> 
> 77- Marious Barrier (COLA): "I must recognize that it is the first
> time I see that kind of troll, once that start asking moderately
> serious questions and since the first answer, gradually starts to
> degenerate it by, in many failed attempts of being sarcastic,
> inserting various indirect insults and calling all people ignorant and
> unable to answer what he asks for."  14 Oct 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/c6607ea64f436821
> 
> 78- Mark Kent (cola): "The problem with someone like Mr Glasser is the
> same as it is with Mr Wong, even if he were to be honest now, it would
> be impossible to determine where the honesty starts and the usual
> dishonesty ends. In my primary school, one of the teachers was very
> keen on proverbs, and I recall her going over the "cry wolf" story. Mr
> Glasser could "cry wolf" over and over now, and I would not come to
> help him with his sheep, because I do not know any way of determining
> if he's ever telling the truth, or indeed, if he ever has."  2 Dec
> 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3f30aa1b65a972b3
> 
> 79- Marti Van Lin (COLA): "I paid enough attention to Snit IMHO. I
> killfiled him the very first month I started lurking COLA. I find his
> nitpicking and immature behavior extremely annoying. I am not going to
> torture myself reading his bullshit. Snit is also a proven liar.
> Remember his retarded exif debacle." 08 Jul 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d12622df3671359b
> 
> 80- Mayor of R'lyeh: "The fact is that he's probably pulling it to
> this post since its all about him and he managed to make me think
> about him today. A friend of mine has a toddler. I went over to her
> house and videotaped her kid doing a bunch of cute toddler stuff then
> burned a DVD of it for her. While we were watching the DVD her kid got
> mad. He got mad because we quit making him the center of attention and
> made that kid on the tv the center of attention. He even ran up to the
> tv and tried to block our view of it. That's how Snit lives his whole
> life."  30 Sep 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9935f4154d5a290b
> 
> 81- McGarnagle: "And you know when Snit is endorsed by two of the
> biggest nutjobs in AGA - RichL and El Kabong - you know he's not very
> bright and a loon." 31 Oct 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.guitar.amps/msg/e60a33341bff1309
> 
> 82- Michelle Ronn: "The real topic here is that one someone refutes
> your 'facts', you run away and ignore them. Refuting your 'facts' is
> easily done in this case. I did it, and you ignored it."  9 Feb 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c050c82720737b32
> 
> 83- Mike: "Nonsense. I never see you "advocate" anything. All I see
> you doing is engage in endless semantic arguments with everyone.
> You're the TholenBot of CSMA. BTW, that's *not* a compliment!"  8 Jul
> 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7c5b72d70b87ffbd
> 
> 84- Mike Dee: "I will no longer accuse you of lying here. Instead I
> can only say that you are a complete and delusional kook that happens
> to inhabit CSMA for the time being. That you are unaware of how
> deranged you actually behave further reinforces this notion. Please
> seek professional help."
> 
> "The point that keeps whooshing over your head Snit, is Elizabot made
> no threat to you before you went to the police. She made a promise.
> Admittedly, to your delusional spaced out paranoiac view point,
> Elizabot was suddenly "threatening" to you. In so much as you had to
> take your kooky self down to your local police shop and blub on their
> shoulders about how much in danger you were in [sob, whine], and they
> had to waste valuable policing time consoling you over your stupidity.
> I bet they have Kook with a capital "K" written at the top of your
> profile, Snit." 2 Sep 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9cf45bc88a324f40
> 
> 85- mmoore321: "Snit is a human car-accident and we are all
> rubbernecking. We know it is bad form, but yet strangely curious.
> Treat him the same way, look but just keep moving on."  18 Aug 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f1c3041d89504c07
> 
> 86- Mojo: "Actually, these facts piss everybody off because they are
> off-topic, unnecessarily confrontational, extremely boring and clearly
> show that you are crying out for attention."  20 Sep 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a38f07b9a4811a80
> 
> 87- Mr. Blonde: "Lastly, I can't help but comment on the fact that
> your obsession with Sandman has actually grown since you claimed to KF
> him. Killfilling someone generally implies you're ignoring that
> person, yet you piggyback onto virtually every reply to him here and
> and check his website's validation status more often than most people
> check their e-mail. These are not the actions of a mentally balanced
> individual." 19 Jan 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2b005666ab303e2b
> 
> 88- MR_ED_of_Course: "Seriously, spend half a day at any pre-school or
> kindergarten and see if the kids there can't teach you a thing or two
> about social behavior."  16 May 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/55c03a6a0b7813a4
> 
> 89- Muahman: "Ahhhh shit, another thread lost to the Snit retard
> circus!!!  I actually dread seeing Snit reply to a thread because that
> automatically means it's in the toilet."  8 Jul 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/92e776d521dfa701
> 
> 90- Mutley (AUK): "For the record ... I'll be done when I decide that
> there's more shit on your face than there is on the sole of my shoe."
> 01 Nov 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/1802ad3aa000098b
> 
> 91- Nashton/Nasht0n: "Oh for crying out loud, if I wasn't convinced
> that snit is a total loser, and I rarely call people losers, I
> certainly am now. Why bother responding to his stupidities anyway?"
> 29 Nov 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/be1a326a81441508
> 
> 92- nessuno (COLA): Chris Ahlstrom: "Have you ever noticed that
> threads involving Snit, [...] are a basically a waste of time?
> nessuno: "Yep. I don't read them."  29 May 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2f997598f0e25f9d
> 
> 93- New Bee: "Honest and honorable? You? You've either got a wry sense
> of humor, or you're completely nuts. Either way you're just a waste of
> time, and you've done more than anybody to make this group a cesspool.
> Then you revel in wallowing in your own filth."  14 May 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/2856277b085d0274
> 
> 94- none of your buisiness (COLA): "I am sorry, but I am going to have
> to send you to the bin. You're perpetrating the Snit circus by
> responding to all of his assinine posts. He is only here for one
> reason, to disrupt this group, & you are helping him, as well as
> flatfish." 04 Jan 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a9b40ce46612fdc4
> 
> 95- Not Important: "I get this mental image of you and a sibling as
> children in the back seat of the family car saying: Mom, 'snits'
> touching me ... and you responding much as you do now ... I'm not
> touching you, you're touching me! The problem is that by now you
> should've grown out of that type of poke and complain interaction with
> others. But, of course, you've haven't learned how to interact with
> others in a more 'constructive' and mutually beneficial manner even
> now."  03 Jul 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d16279e9003ca8f4
> 
> 96- notlisted (COLA): "I actually like Apple.  But I see you as an
> asshole who spends an embarassing percentage of your life posting
> derogatory comments about a computer operating system you obviously
> detest, and insulting those who defend it in a newsgroup dedicated its
> advocacy.  That's almost the definition of being an asshole, and you
> have half a dozen buddies who do the same thing.  You excuse what you
> do by pretending that you're merely pointing out problems in the hope
> that the system will be improved, but that's an obvious lie whether
> it's you saying it or one of your buds.  You do it because you enjoy
> the feeling it gives you, whatever that is."  07 Mar 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/90b57eaa796e8b14
> 
> 97- OldCSMAer: "What's he been doing? Am I going to be sorry I
> killfiled him?"  27 Nov 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/23b808d9646cd257
> 
> 98- OldSage: "What drives me nuts is your unrelenting ability and
> desire to argue on the head of a pin about the most trivial of
> things."  2 Oct 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/88457f8e7c25273e
> 
> 99- Oxford: "If you are using MT-Newswatcher:  Select offending
> Author, example Snit...  Go to the Filters Menu, Choose 'Kill this
> Author' Click 'OK'  Then Repeat with each annoying Author of your
> choice. Then to see your work... Choose the Filter Menu again, Then
> 'Refilter Articles'...  Bam! No more boring, pointless bickering about
> nothing. Enjoy!!!!!"  14 Aug 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1d7f9181e95ed9ec
> 
> 100- Owl (COLA): "You have interacted with me often enough to know
> that I never initiate personal attacks.  I generally respond in kind.
> It is you who usually fall off the civility wagon first, with your
> ironically condescending canned responses that do nothing for your
> argument and generally shine a spotlight on the desperation that you
> are so fearful of projecting."  5 Mar 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8debf93e05da4d26
> 
> Owl (COLA): "You are a complete idiot and extremely dishonest.
> Consider yourself permanently plonked."  29 Mar 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ba7797c5108b3c10
> 
> 101- Patrick Nihill: "I mean, honestly, who would you rather discuss
> something with; Dan, or someone like Zara? Or, for that matter, Snit,
> for whom the work 'troll' seems so painfully inadequate?"  13 Aug 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/f93db68e683ad769
> 
> 102- Pawel Wojciak: "Jesus Christ, snit... <plonk> "  27 Jun 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/93afdfea4d4f491a
> 
> 103- PC Guy: "Forget it Snit, you're a waste of time. For someone who
> talks about everyone else not being "honest and honorable" you appear
> to be the least honest and honorable of anyone here."  22 Apr 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/36bf51df2a2662a4
> 
> 104- Peter: "I've never felt the need to use the filters in
> Newswatcher but I thought Id try the Kill this Author.. option with
> Snit. Ten seconds later and he's gone! Amazing."  30 Dec 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/011eef01d7bcd56c
> 
> 105- Peter Bjorn Perlso: "Plonked for 60 days. Now stfu and take your
> argument with sandman into the private room."  13 Dec 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ae4651ec99be3c77
> 
> 106- Peter Hayes: "True, but that removes Snit completely, and
> someti... err..... occasiona.... errrrr..... once in a blue moon he
> has something useful to say."  20 Mar 2007
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/8a31a47e26c5f5b7
> 
> 107- Peter Jensen (cola): "Where has he ever said that they were not
> different windowing environments? Message-ID, please. Experience has
> told me not to trust you on anything without backing evidence."  30
> Jun 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/cfd5de2006d42fdc
> 
> 108- Peter Kohlmann (cola): "Snot Glasser is invading this group with
> his inane drivel, so he has to bear what people think about that
> dishonest retard. And just for the record: You *are* a Glasser sock"
> 30 Jan 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/f3166f6fda92641b
> 
> 109- PeterBP: "Oh will you stfu".  30 Mar 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3e88e9a86cb5483e
> 
> 110- Phil Earnhardt: "You're only interested in trying to get
> superficial snipes and extrapolate inappropriate conclusions."  1 Nov
> 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/ad24a97d5dc86277
> 
> 111- Rapskat (cola): "For instance, your sig you reference a long
> standing war you have going with some person from csma. It's like you
> single out persons to target your attentions upon and then
> continuously berate them with constant barbs and goads to perpetuate
> their acrimonious responses, which in turn you respond in kind, etc.
> ad infinitum. Above all things, your affinity for Macs and your
> overbearing pompous nature aside, this is what convinces me that your
> primary purpose for frequenting this and other groups is to troll."
> 07 Sep 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/a09c6b8e3e63f42d
> 
> 112- RichardK: "Just killfile him already."  20 Jun 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c9e7ded2e95a582
> 
> 113- Rick (cola): "Snit, you are a liar. And an ignorant one. You
> trash people that are trying their level best to cope with a
> horrendous situation. And you do it without the slightest idea of what
> is going on."  06 Sep 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/fcad2955ac5cb03b
> 
> 114- Rick G.: "Just to be plain here, I have no doubt that he is a
> troll. I am tolerant of his nature, not blind to it. However, as a
> troll, he is ... somewhat clumsy."  22 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/198b88e3d0064a92
> 
> 115- Robert F.: "Um, perhaps you misunderstand. I don't care if you
> quote Mayor McCheese claiming the Earth is a flat plate perched on the
> shell of a tortoise, I was merely pointing out that you run the risk
> of looking ridiculous when you quote something patently stupid. If
> that's your goal, you're on the right track, and more power to you."
> 11 Jan 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/4dc22433eae8803d
> 
> 116- RonB (COLA): "Snit is a crank fixated on one issue, who's thing
> is twisting your words so he can win an argument against a straw man.
> That's enough to killfile him." 1 Jan 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/ce8550d4cc5b1b42
> 
> RonB: (COLA): "Why do you bother responding to Snit? He makes no
> point, he simply gainsays whatever you say. Just another version of
> Hadron's 'you're a liar' mantra, which is about all he can muster
> nowadays." 27 May 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/279210dd877d7aa0
> 
> RonB (COLA): "Original subject line now killfiled. You can only talk
> about the freaking clipboard for so many million freaking messages. As
> I said, Snit has no common-sense, STOP mechanism. He's a mechanically
> obsessive super crank and will go on forever. I'm not kidding about
> this, he will *NEVER* *ever* stop."  6 Mar 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/0df1e0164a8b586e
> 
> 117- Rotten Apple: "You make trolls like me look like choir boys."  14
> Sep 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7a92988bcbce8fdb
> 
> 118- Roy Culley (cola): "You appear to be in the latter category.
> Starting crossposted threads for the simple purpose of hoping to
> generate a flame war. If you truly want to learn more about Linux and
> how it can help you and your supposed users why aren't you requesting
> help from a more technical Linux newsgroup than an advocacy group? As
> the old saying goes, those who can do, those who can't teach. Your
> posts seem to confirm that saying IMHO."  12 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d521a80051e24d08
> 
> 119- S'mee (Keith, rec.motorcycles): "Liar...forger and worthless. You
> must be related to our resident racist troll, he lies as much as you."
> 29 Dec 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab08c00330c8b58d
> 
> 120- Sandman: "He is by far the most killfiled person in the -HISTORY-
> of csma. I've never seen someone so disliked, almost hated, in a news
> group before. He has the ability to turn just about any person against
> him in just a few posts. On usenet, trolls do this daily, but the
> funny part with Michael is that I actually think he DOESN'T consider
> himself be a troll - damn what -EVERYONE ELSE- is calling him.
> Obviously they are wrong. Only Tholen himself can match this
> behaviour."  18 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/51c0735c774215c2
> 
> 121- sav: "You really need to take a rest somewhere nice. Honestly,
> even the nutters who hang out down on Brighton seafront made more
> sense than this. You been doing drugs or something?"  25 May 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1b251baa5c641370
> 
> 122- Sean Burke: If you're dumb enough to respond to snit, you're
> probably dumb enough to click on a spam attachment that promises to
> remove smut from your harddrive."  21 Jan 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/e166032d8959c0e1
> 
> 123- Sermo Malifer (COLA): Snit: "Why do so many people in COLA argue
> *against* me..." Sermo Malifer: "Because you're a narcissistic troll
> who posts trash just to get people talking about you."  21 Jan 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5ddf14f502e9b3f1
> 
> 124- spike1: "As for the original post, there's plenty of reason
> thought and criteria. The reason is snit's here. The thought is
> probably to show everyone here just how bad a troll snit is."  03 Dec
> 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/c797d640e3b9fc12
> 
> 125- ShutterBugz: "so snit-zel has some kind of problem expressing
> anger, i guess. he has to vent his frustrations in other ways. and he
> thinks he's making sense: well the syntax is there and he figures he's
> pretty smart. indeed, he tells us, he's done the personality tests and
> the iq tests and he's okay! aaaaahhhhh, you see he's soooooooo well
> adjusted."  3 Mar 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/7f9fa1cf90490298
> 
> 126- Steel (COLA): "You may not like the game, but nevertheless, it's
> just a game. You play a game yourself don't kid yourself."  14 Oct
> 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/be1f49165984c350
> 
> 127- Steve Carroll: "Snit isn't much more than a one trick pony and
> not telling the whole story is one of his two main tricks. His other
> main trick is to outright lie. Sprinkle in a bit of denial and you've
> gone a long way towards defining his MO.  The idea that Snit admits to
> his errors is one of the biggest jokes on usenet."  28 Feb 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/0cc84ece10726aac
> 
> 128- Steve Mackay: "Just killfile Snit, the dishonest piece of
> elephant dung, and all would go away. Sure, I got caught up in the
> "Snit Circus", but then the cotton candy began to sour, and CSMA begun
> to smell like elephant dung."  18 Aug 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9fc11094133dfcdf
> 
> 129- Steven de Mena: "Sorry, you have now lost all credibility with me
> for your rediculous argument regarding this."  26 Sep 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/1c8777d39c34e293
> 
> 130- Steve Travis: "Oh oh...  Now look what we've done.  Snit has lost
> all self respect and has sunk to the point of using words like 'asses'
> when referring to others.  Oh, how could the morally superior snit
> have fallen so low..  Please take a moment out of your busy schedule
> to feel embarassed for him.  Or perhaps we should set up a fund to get
> him more happy glue (and the appropriate plastic bags)."  27 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/3edd9ab69425a6c5
> 
> 131- Stuart Krivis: "You might as well just give up and plonk him
> then. A snit is a snit is a snit and always will be."  15 Aug 2006
> (post not available except in reply)
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5b382420a696f140
> 
> 132- Tattoo Vampire (COLA): "In other words, in another attempt to
> troll, you made yourself look like a fool. Again".  28 Aug 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b2676d3540e09f38
> 
> 133- thanatoid: "Is business/personal life/etc. SO bad that you had to
> create Snit? I really thought higher of you until Snit came in here,
> in fact I find your site very nice and wish there was a shop like
> yours where I live (well, I /think/...) Or is Snit really just someone
> whose HD you accidentally wiped? Either way, it seems to have created
> a lot of, for lack of a better word, unpleasantness - just from
> looking at today's headers."  02 Jul 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/24hoursupport.helpdesk/msg/1c43a7415c97bfa1
> 
> 134- The Lost Packet (COLA): "well, he's found a seat in my killbin, I
> can't be doing with him."  27 Jan 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2007526a552b3322
> 
> 135- TheLetterK: "That is merely your perception, Shit. You're the one
> lacking counter evidence, and your arguments basically amount to "I'm
> right, nya nya nya." No matter how many examples someone points at to
> demonstrate their claim, you blindly continue to insist that they
> provide no evidence, or that the evidence given is irrelevant. Worse
> still, you fall back on straw men and disingenuous quote mangling to
> portray the argument in your favor. You are one of the worst trolls
> that inhabit CSMA, Shit. *Edwin* is more prone to fits of reason than
> you are."  23 Sep 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/d488596b57132124
> 
> 136- Thufir: "You can "prove" that no one has disproved your "proof"?
> Again, your assertion that no one has done so is even *less*
> convincing than your claim that some PDF "proves" whatever point
> you're trying to make precisely because I'm familiar with your MO.
> That is, you're a dumb-ass who would claim that that something is
> proved when it's not, and who would ignore counter-examples disproving
> your contention. I don't know what this *ages old* thread is about,
> but I know that you're full of shit."  21 Aug 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/5114623055c01092
> 
> 137-Tim Adams: "I'd kill file you but then I'd miss the fun. you see,
> you never cease to amaze me at just how stupid you really are. Why
> just the other day I had a great laugh when I saw you, the king of
> liars (in this NG anyway) calling somebody else a liar."  13 Nov 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c7f9407179ff2a
> 
> 138- Tim Crowley: "I don't know - I think you might have more
> compassion. Snit is sick. He needs help. This is the only way the poor
> sick fool can get attention. My fucking God, he's taken to hanging out
> with and supporting racist pig fuckers like MuahMuah. It is true that
> no-one likes him and those that pretend they do are just using him or
> don't know him - but come on- it's not his fault. He's sick. Have some
> compassion, eh? All these idiot trolls, Zara, Stew, Tommy,
> MuaaaahMuaaah, and Snit - they are all so alike. I pity each and every
> one of them"  19 Apr 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/67f0f174110bfa0a
> 
> 139- Tim Smith: "No, he didn't, and there is no reasonable way you
> could actually believe he lied. You are purely trying to troll here."
> 14 Apr 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/6e3cfd9240ac4871
> 
> 140- Timberwoof: "Plonk, Snit."  23 Apr 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/40c8df070c3e776c
> 
> 141- tom_elam: "Killfile Steve C. and Snit"  07 Jul 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b50d0c973d21d995
> 
> 142- TomB (COLA): "No Snit, you were flat out lying in an attempt to
> make me look bad. Do you really have to sink to that level in order to
> 'be right'? If so, you're pathetic. And I don't say this because I
> like to say it."  07 Feb 2010
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/43263f575ac40353
> 
> 143- Tom Bates: "Do you have to turn any thread you post in into one
> of your Circus acts?"  20 Feb 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/25f0e481b605e71f
> 
> 144- Tommy: "In case you did not get it, I think the moral was: Stop
> polluting the world with your infantile and obsessive "writings". You
> give Mac advocacy a bad name. If that was your goal you have
> succeeded! That also goes for all that bullshit on your website"  11
> Jun 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/03610d2080321d33
> 
> 145- Tony(UK) (COLA): "Your email address in your headers just about
> sums the Linux world up. Nothing to do with the OS, it is the *uckwits
> involved in the whole arena and have posted before on this. If in
> doubt, deride, insult and attack. Look inwardly carefully before
> judging me." 10 Dec 2009
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/533042ed18cefba3
> 
> 146- TravelinMan: "I still can't figure out what's wrong with Snit.
> Most people have him kill-filed and the few who don't mostly restrict
> their responses to 'why don't you go away, no one wants you here'.
> Just what would keep someone in this group with all of that animosity?
> Must be some kind of severe mental illness."  17 Mar 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/45197fbb46d491df
> 
> 147- Wally: "Because by your own admission "honor and honesty" are
> nothing more than a "game" to you, as such not only do you wish to
> define the rules, but no doubt you will also attempt to alter or bend
> the rules when inevitably things do not go to your liking, for this
> reason I doubt anyone would be foolish enough to play your game."  16
> May 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/b9b3ed1ee20e5220
> 
> 148- White Spirit (COLA): "Snit deserves a good beat-down, Rodney King
> style. I have had to plonk the worthless piece of Snit to prevent my
> monitor being defiled with the presence of his idiotic, narcissistic
> tripe."  24 Aug 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/2e3adbaae4bfb91d
> 
> 149- WhoMe: "F michael IS a teacher, it's no wonder he's home more
> than he's anywhere near a classroom".
> 
> 150- William Poaster: "Good grief. If anyone's having a mental
> breakdown it's the Prescott Computer Guy, Michael Snit Glasser. What a
> f#cked up mess he is."  29 Aug 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/914d1e74855fb461
> 
> 151- William R. Walsh: "Now, if you'll excuse me, and accept my
> sincere apologies for this, PLONK! Feel proud about that. You're the
> first person to be plonked from my new computer!  :-)  "  10 Feb 2005
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/313c7368f6369c49
> 
> 152- Woofbert: "*Plonk*"  14 Jun 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/436e6b5333d747e0
> 
> 153- zara: "Look - I'm not into combing through thousands of posts, to
> prove what was said or not said - I leave stuff like that to people
> without lives, like Snit. But it is assuredly, in the record. Ping
> Snit to do a search - you will flatter him, and give meaning to his
> tawdry little life."  25 Oct 2006
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/a1d4fc7120a6a538
> 
> 154- Zaren Ankleweed: "And with that, Snit goes in the global
> killfile. No subject, no author, no nothing. Buh-bye".  11 Sep 2004
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/12f7c34f24d43624
> 
> 155- Znu: "The Snit Circus has gotten particularly bad as of late.
> When I set up my filters to kill all of Snit's posts, plus direct
> replies to them (which is how I'm keeping things from now on), nearly
> 40% of the most recent 1000 articles in CSMA go out the window. ....
> In all, something like 50% of the traffic in this group is now related
> to Snit insanity. .... I killfile Edwin because I don't have a
> patience to have discussions with someone who deliberately tries to
> waste my time. But watching *other people* tie him knots can be
> entertaining. The Snit-related posts are not like this. They are
> endless repetitions of the exact same material and/or arguments dating
> back *years* about who said what."  20 Apr 2008
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.sys.mac.advocacy/msg/9244dd79c682b2d6
> 
> 156- Kari Lane (COLA): "You are pitiful. And a big pain in the ass.
> Without you there might be change to get some real discussion going on
> about Linux."  27 Aug 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/5889b9cdf65c0b44
> 
> 157- Roy Schestowitz (COLA): "Your neighbour troll has gotten no
> attention, so he decided to start spamming our site, having trolled
> the IRC channel. He has just posted 7 non-content self-promotion links
> in a matter of 5 minute (as comments), The trolling and stalking
> elsewhere have verged the pathological too. S*it Glasser -- see help.
> You're clearly insane." [...] "The Prescott Lunattic has just pasted
> his ENTIRE BLOG into my blog (as comments). If this is not an
> UBERTROLL, I don't know what is.  31 Aug 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/b66f067167d0d36b
> 
> 157- Roy Schestowitz (COLA): "He is piggy-backing other people's sites
> for attention. Frankly, he's the most disgusting form of troll and no
> wonder even the Mac forums disowned him. He's a real-life troll."  31
> Aug 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/543bc1b219961b16
> 
> 158 - 7 (COLA): "You went off topic, run, back down, accepted you are
> a HYPOCRITE, trolled, posted net abuse and underlined your illiterate
> character, ignored the answer, made false accusation and trolled
> again." 23 Nov 2011
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/7a9240935bfd3ffc
> 
> 159 - DFS (COLA): "About Snit? If so, I was fooled by him for a long
> time, too, mostly because I didn't closely read his threads. I knew he
> liked to split hairs and argue endlessly, so I usually glossed over
> his threads. I didn't realize he would keep babbling "Support your
> accusation" even in the face of direct evidence of his lies. Oh well.
> I finally decided to killfile him again (my only entry)."  27 Mar 2012
> 
> https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/d5fff469502bc7ba
> 
> 160 - Torre Starnes (COLA): DFS: "About Snit?" Torre Starnes: "Yep. I
> admit I was sucked in. In the dumper....." 27 Mar 2012
> 
> https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/81eabc1a75ff01d2
> 
> 161 - clogwog (COLA): "This discussion, a very boring one, is leading
> nowhere, please try to accept that cc has his arguments to disagree
> with you."  31 May 2012
> 
> https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/8bc89787876f55a0
> 
> 162 - Don Zeigler (COLA)
> 
> "Hopefully none of Snot's family, friends or business associates will
> ever run across this thread archived on Google. It's the most shining
> example yet of his obviously unbalanced mental state. He's told so
> many whoppers he can't even keep his story straight." Jan 16 2009
> 
> https://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/ab7014a465685945
> 
> 163 - Gregory Shearman (COLA)
> 
> "Just killfile the troll, don't engage it." - Oct 13 2010



See. I can still smell a k00k a mile away.   

<Bows>

Next?





-- 
gburnore at Panix dot Com 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore                       |  ?????????????????????????????????
                                      |  ?????????????????????????????????
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.|  ?????????????????????????????????
                                      |  ?? 0 1 7 2 3 / ??? 3 7 4 9 3 0 o?
Bronx Division                        |     Official Proof of Purchase
===========================================================================

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
    "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
        Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
          Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
            Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
              Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
                Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
                Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
              Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
            Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
                Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
                Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
                Usenet is a form of email.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
                [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
                Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
                What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
                Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
                I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
                Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
                Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
                I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
                I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
                Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
    Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
      Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
      Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
        Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
          Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
            Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400

csiph-web