Re: Usenet is a form of email. ????????????

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	alt.free.newsservers, comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, news.software.readers, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject	Re: Usenet is a form of email. ????????????
Date	2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
Message-ID	<CD8EFAA6.19193%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(6 earlier) <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.13{10.43.Seattle.2013}> <CD8EEB87.19170%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <kkc71d$qcn$4@reader1.panix.com> <CD8EF077.1917D%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <kkc81b$4ta$2@reader1.panix.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/13/13 11:26 AM, in article kkc81b$4ta$2@reader1.panix.com, "Gary
Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote:

> In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>> On 4/13/13 11:09 AM, in article kkc71d$qcn$4@reader1.panix.com, "Gary
>> Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> In alt.usenet.kooks Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>>>> On 4/13/13 10:43 AM, in article Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.13{10.43.Seattle.2013},
>>>> "Jeff-Relf.Me" <@.> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Usenet is a form of email.
>>>> 
>>>> Incorrect.
>>> 
>>> K00k, he's trolling you.
>> 
>> As are you of course.
>> 
>>>>> Most anything that can handle emails, also handles Usenet;
>>>>> including HTML emails/posts.
>>>> 
>>>> Incorrect.
>>> 
>>> Kook, he's correct.  Most mondern day email programs for windoze, you know,
>>> like YOU use,
>>> can handle USENet newsgroups just fine. Try Thunderbird, better than ms crap
>>> YOU use.
>> 
>> Many[SLAP]
> 
> Is this you not replying?  Do you always talk in generalizations that you base
> SOLELY on your own personal experience?
> 
> Then you too can be a kook like snit.
> 
> Like i said, git, welcome to AUK.
> 
> 
> 
Your trolling is boring enough where you are about at the point where you
will cease to get responses from me. If you really want the attention you
seem to you will have to improve your game. Your snipping and ignoring what
you are responding to, for example, simply is useless in terms of any
reasonable conversation... or even a not-so-reasonable one done just for the
heck of it. Not at all interesting.

-- 
"I mischaracterize things you say." - Brad cc Wiggins

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
    "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
        Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
          Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
            Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
              Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
                Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
                Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
              Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
            Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
                Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
                Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
                Usenet is a form of email.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
                [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
                Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
                What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
                Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
                I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
                Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
                Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
                I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
                I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
                Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ï»¿ï»¿ Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
    Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
      Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
      Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
        Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
          Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
            Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400

csiph-web