Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Netnews: The Origin Story |
| Date | 2024-11-06 22:51 -0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87v7wzerpd.fsf@jemoni.to> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <87a5edtsrr.fsf@jemoni.to> <1r2lmw5.52vtyww92xsaN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <87a5ech2f4.fsf@jemoni.to> <0d394330-f861-44f9-c1a9-409d98fde094@example.net> <vgg5h2$26hvt$1@dont-email.me> |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: > D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> This is the truth! As a thought experiment I sometimes think about >> how I would be able to handle usenet if it had 10x the nr of posts, >> and I don't think I would. > > Been there, seen that.... Circa 1995 (I forget which groups now) the > text posting volume was so great in the few groups I was following that > it was not possible to keep up. I was always behind, and falling > further behind each day. Eventually the fall behind problem reached a > point where I decided to just drop out. So I disappeared for a good > ten years or so. Of course, when I did return again, Usenet was a > shadow of its former self as far as text posting rates go. > >> It would have to be either a laser focus on a very small nr of >> groups, or aggressive filtering of the subject lines. > > One did have to do both, and even so, the volume was impossible to keep > up with if the group was at all active. That's right. This gives me the idea that a community should not really be that large. On the other hand, I do think the size we are right now could be enlarged a bit.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-05 18:27 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-05 15:55 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 11:42 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 11:17 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:54 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 16:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 21:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 11:04 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:12 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 16:19 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 18:28 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:04 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 19:41 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:14 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 22:59 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:23 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:18 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:40 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 22:02 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 22:51 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:07 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:14 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:15 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 20:26 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:42 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:39 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 23:16 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:52 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 17:17 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-06 18:56 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:20 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 22:45 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-11-07 10:10 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-07 00:34 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:06 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-08 06:32 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 21:03 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:16 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-07 03:20 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:04 +0100
csiph-web