Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #26042

Re: Netnews: The Origin Story

From Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to>
Newsgroups comp.misc
Subject Re: Netnews: The Origin Story
Date 2024-11-07 13:12 -0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87wmhfaupy.fsf@jemoni.to> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <vgg5h2$26hvt$1@dont-email.me> <6b63eca1-aa26-8156-b1b8-2d42b7b9d245@example.net> <vggo7n$29oi4$1@dont-email.me> <49397abc-27f6-d53b-8c1d-d623b5f24395@example.net> <vgi6sa$2kbem$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes:

> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Rich wrote:
>> 
>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Rich wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> This is the truth!  As a thought experiment I sometimes think 
>>>>>> about how I would be able to handle usenet if it had 10x the nr 
>>>>>> of posts, and I don't think I would.
>>>>>
>>>>> Been there, seen that....  Circa 1995 (I forget which groups now) 
>>>>> the text posting volume was so great in the few groups I was 
>>>>> following that it was not possible to keep up.  I was always 
>>>>> behind, and falling further behind each day.  Eventually the fall 
>>>>> behind problem reached a point where I decided to just drop out.  
>>>>> So I disappeared for a good ten years or so.  Of course, when I 
>>>>> did return again, Usenet was a shadow of its former self as far as 
>>>>> text posting rates go.
>>>>>
>>>>>> It would have to be either a laser focus on a very small nr of 
>>>>>> groups, or aggressive filtering of the subject lines.
>>>>>
>>>>> One did have to do both, and even so, the volume was impossible to 
>>>>> keep up with if the group was at all active.
>>>>
>>>> This is an interesting problem. How is it solved in modern social media?
>>>
>>> If by "modern social media" you mean the likes of FB and its ilk, 
>>> presumably by having "the algorithm" showing you stuff, and then you 
>>> just doom scroll through the algorithm driven feed.  And if stuff 
>>> does not get put on your feed, you are unaware of its existance.
>>>
>> 
>> Ah, so probably just setting some keywords in my client and filter based 
>> on those. Not a very satisfactory solution.
>
> Except with "modern social media" you (the user) don't get to "just 
> set[ting] some keywords" for the "algorithm".  The "algorithm" does it 
> all for you by magic.  Which, unfortunately, leaves you at the mercy of 
> the allmighty "algorithm" as to what you see, and provides a great 
> opportunity for the "algorithm" to bias your world view into whatever 
> its creators want your world view to be by selective showing or 
> omission of various posts to your feed.

In other words, it's unacceptable---period.

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-05 18:27 +0000
  Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-05 15:55 -0300
    Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 11:42 +0000
      Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 11:17 -0300
        Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:54 +0100
          Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 16:29 +0000
            Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
              Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 21:48 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:03 +0100
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 11:04 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:12 -0300
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 16:19 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 18:28 -0300
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:04 +0100
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 19:41 -0300
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:14 +0100
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 22:59 +0100
              Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:23 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:18 +0100
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:40 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 22:02 +0100
            Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 22:51 -0300
              Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:07 +0100
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:14 -0300
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0100
          Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:15 +1000
            Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 20:26 +0000
              Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:42 +0100
            Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:39 +0100
            Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 23:16 -0300
      Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:52 +0100
        Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 17:17 +0000
          Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-06 18:56 +0000
            Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:20 +1000
          Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
            Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 22:45 +0000
              Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-11-07 10:10 +1000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-07 00:34 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:06 +0100
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-08 06:32 +1000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 21:03 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:03 +0100
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:16 +0100
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:48 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:29 +0000
                Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-07 03:20 +0000
              Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:04 +0100

csiph-web