Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Netnews: The Origin Story |
| Date | 2024-11-07 18:28 -0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87v7wy91jc.fsf@jemoni.to> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <vggo7n$29oi4$1@dont-email.me> <49397abc-27f6-d53b-8c1d-d623b5f24395@example.net> <vgi6sa$2kbem$1@dont-email.me> <87wmhfaupy.fsf@jemoni.to> <vgipb9$2njhc$1@dont-email.me> |
Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: > Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> wrote: >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >> >>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Rich wrote: >>>> >>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Rich wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>>>>>>> This is the truth! As a thought experiment I sometimes think >>>>>>>> about how I would be able to handle usenet if it had 10x the nr >>>>>>>> of posts, and I don't think I would. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Been there, seen that.... Circa 1995 (I forget which groups now) >>>>>>> the text posting volume was so great in the few groups I was >>>>>>> following that it was not possible to keep up. I was always >>>>>>> behind, and falling further behind each day. Eventually the fall >>>>>>> behind problem reached a point where I decided to just drop out. >>>>>>> So I disappeared for a good ten years or so. Of course, when I >>>>>>> did return again, Usenet was a shadow of its former self as far as >>>>>>> text posting rates go. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It would have to be either a laser focus on a very small nr of >>>>>>>> groups, or aggressive filtering of the subject lines. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> One did have to do both, and even so, the volume was impossible to >>>>>>> keep up with if the group was at all active. >>>>>> >>>>>> This is an interesting problem. How is it solved in modern social media? >>>>> >>>>> If by "modern social media" you mean the likes of FB and its ilk, >>>>> presumably by having "the algorithm" showing you stuff, and then you >>>>> just doom scroll through the algorithm driven feed. And if stuff >>>>> does not get put on your feed, you are unaware of its existance. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ah, so probably just setting some keywords in my client and filter based >>>> on those. Not a very satisfactory solution. >>> >>> Except with "modern social media" you (the user) don't get to "just >>> set[ting] some keywords" for the "algorithm". The "algorithm" does it >>> all for you by magic. Which, unfortunately, leaves you at the mercy of >>> the allmighty "algorithm" as to what you see, and provides a great >>> opportunity for the "algorithm" to bias your world view into whatever >>> its creators want your world view to be by selective showing or >>> omission of various posts to your feed. >> >> In other words, it's unacceptable---period. > > Indeed, yes. With a user-local killfile (i.e., the Usenet client > method) then you, the user, is explicitly deciding what you want to > exclude (or include, as most modern clients implement the 'kill' as a > score so one can up/down articles if one wants). > > But with the allmightly algorithm, you are at the mercy of your > corporate overlords. > > Sadly, as most social media users are very similar to the humans on the > spaceship on the cartoon Wall-E, they are lazy and want "someone else" > to do all the work for them, expecting them to put in the even minimal > effort to curate their own local 'killfile' is likely too much to > expect. And that's a very interesting phenomenon---that people are so uninterested in such relevant matters. The laziness looks more like a depression, a state of total uninterest in one's life.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-05 18:27 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-05 15:55 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 11:42 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 11:17 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:54 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 16:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 21:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 11:04 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:12 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 16:19 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 18:28 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:04 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 19:41 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:14 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 22:59 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:23 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:18 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:40 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 22:02 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 22:51 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:07 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:14 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:15 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 20:26 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:42 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:39 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 23:16 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:52 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 17:17 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-06 18:56 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:20 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 22:45 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-11-07 10:10 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-07 00:34 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:06 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-08 06:32 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 21:03 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:16 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-07 03:20 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:04 +0100
csiph-web