Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Netnews: The Origin Story |
| Date | 2024-11-08 16:16 +0100 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <cc965781-8cae-051f-e547-931bc4027339@example.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <7ae3666d-26fb-3a94-9c79-13ca15dc0fb7@example.net> <672d23c2@news.ausics.net> <vgj9uf$2qcb7$1@dont-email.me> <91478226-bb94-bb85-d76e-bef5262212f1@example.net> <vgjgq2$2re8i$1@dont-email.me> |
On Thu, 7 Nov 2024, Rich wrote: > D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024, Rich wrote: >> >>> Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote: >>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 7 Nov 2024, Sn!pe wrote: >>>>>> I think D is more concerned about anonymity than other considerations, >>>>>> then about 'eavesdropping'. I'm sure he'll tell us RSN. >>>>> >>>>> This is the correct interpretation. I our times of polarization and >>>>> net-hating, having a modicum of anonymity and privacy is very nice. >>>> >>>> That's not about Usenet being unencrypted then. Your identity is >>>> equally compromised whether you post here via NNTP or NNTPS. But >>>> you might still not be individually identifiable if you take other >>>> measures to protect it. >>> >>> Anonymity on Usenet is facilitated (in today's world) by the fact that >>> most every poster is using a "commercial" service [1] that does not >>> enforce strict naming requirements on the From: line contents. By >>> having the freedom to post as "From: D <nospam@example.net>" in the >>> From: line, D has more anonymity than they would have had back in the >>> mid 90's when their Usenet access would likely have been via $job or >>> college, and both $job and college would most likely have enforced use >>> of a "real name and real email address" in the From: line. >> >> That's a very good point and a very interesting historical >> perspective. Thank you very much for sharing. > > It was very much reality. Mid 90's, most internet users only had > access via either their employer or their college, as the very idea of > an ISP and/or "dialup internet" had not yet hit the general population > mindset. > > And 'internet' access in those days was, more often than not, via a > shared shell account Unix workstation to which one would connect (via > one or more of VT100 style serial terminal or dialup modem to a Unix > terminal server). One had one's choice of what software to run on > one's shell account (tin, rn, slrn, etc.) but the Usenet server to > which these all communicated on that Unix workstation/server was > controlled by the workstation sysadmin, and in almost all cases, it > enforced that your 'From:' line name in your Usenet posts was your > real, actual, identification on that server. > > Which also meant if you posted something that someone took great > offense to, from your @mit.edu account, that the "offended" would > contact the mit.edu sysadmins, and the "offending" user would be "taken > behind the woodshed" as it may be. > > Granted, "offended" individuals still can contact whatever usenet host > someone uses to access usenet and bitch up a storm (the necessary > headers are in every article). But that same host, being in the > 'business' of usenet access, is much less likely to care about "From: > Q@nowhere"'s offensive post than the @mit.edu folks would have been > back in the day. > > And, of course, joe random stalker has a much harder time tracking down > "Q@nowhere"'s real life identity and location than he does in tracking > down the same for john.smith.iii@mit.edu. Makes a lot of sense. I also think that a lot of (well some) amateur usenet providers have a strong sense of freedom of speech, so it would take a lot for them to even bother.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-05 18:27 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-05 15:55 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 11:42 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 11:17 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:54 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 16:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 21:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 11:04 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:12 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 16:19 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 18:28 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:04 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 19:41 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:14 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 22:59 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:23 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:18 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:40 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 22:02 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 22:51 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:07 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:14 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:15 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 20:26 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:42 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:39 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 23:16 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:52 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 17:17 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-06 18:56 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:20 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 22:45 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-11-07 10:10 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-07 00:34 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:06 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-08 06:32 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 21:03 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:16 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-07 03:20 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:04 +0100
csiph-web