Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Netnews: The Origin Story |
| Date | 2024-11-06 21:42 +0100 |
| Organization | i2pn2 (i2pn.org) |
| Message-ID | <4e416550-8525-d31f-960f-e6490167ce39@example.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <1r2lmw5.52vtyww92xsaN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> <87a5ech2f4.fsf@jemoni.to> <0d394330-f861-44f9-c1a9-409d98fde094@example.net> <672bce76@news.ausics.net> <vggjd5$28spt$1@dont-email.me> |
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024, Rich wrote: > Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> wrote: >> D <nospam@example.net> wrote: >>> This is the truth! As a thought experiment I sometimes think about >>> how I would be able to handle usenet if it had 10x the nr of posts, >>> and I don't think I would. >>> >>> It would have to be either a laser focus on a very small nr of >>> groups, or aggressive filtering of the subject lines. >> >> True, although in desperation for content my focus has expanded to >> lurking in groups I'm barely interested in. I might not mind needing >> to narrow my focus back a lot. > > In it's heyday in the mid 90's, the posting rate was such that in > popular groups, one could spend hours reading, clearing the rest of a > thread that went off the rails, marking all as read on entirely > uninteresting threads, and managing to clear what seemed like a > thousand or two posts. And then, at the end of it all, if one had > managed to sift through, say, 1000 posts, finding that the group had > received 1250 new posts during the time one had cleared the 1000. > > The rate of the firehose of posts is hard to imagine if one wasn't > active on usenet at the time to witness it in person. I do have vague memories from around 1995-1997 of toying with usenet and almost getting crushed by the content.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-05 18:27 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-05 15:55 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 11:42 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 11:17 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:54 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 16:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 21:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 11:04 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:12 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 16:19 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 18:28 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:04 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 19:41 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:14 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 22:59 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:23 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:18 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:40 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 22:02 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 22:51 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:07 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:14 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:15 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 20:26 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:42 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:39 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 23:16 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:52 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 17:17 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-06 18:56 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:20 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 22:45 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-11-07 10:10 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-07 00:34 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:06 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-08 06:32 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 21:03 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:16 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-07 03:20 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:04 +0100
csiph-web