Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598765

Re: climate change

From	whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity
Subject	Re: climate change
Date	2023-01-01 06:16 -0600
Message-ID	<k1dbtkF72o7U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(15 earlier) <k17rvrFbuk6U1@mid.individual.net> <k18jkrFf1s0U1@mid.individual.net> <k1a9prFncfgU1@mid.individual.net> <k1bolrFu9b0U1@mid.individual.net> <k1cuhoF55r3U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Having read your entire offering I find there is only one appropriate
response.


BURP!

Goodbye.




On 1/1/2023 2:28 AM, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 31.12.2022 um 22:42 schrieb whodat:
> 
>>
>> You think???? Am I allowed to draw any conclusions at all, or is that
>> reserved for you alone? I conclude you exhibit raging confusion above.
>> Several ways, in fact. I am not required to quantify further.
> 
> 
> 
> You are responsible for your own activities alone and have to bare the 
> consequences, if something is illegal. But that is simply not my concern.
> 
>>
>>  > In that case it would be polite, if you would say, why you think,
>> that my statement is wrong and in which aspect.
>>
>>
>>
>> If politeness actually worked I would be using it. Even clear insult
>> in the reductio ad absurdum genre barely puts a dent into your
>> misapprehensions.
>>
> Politeness is not based on politness on the other side. You are either 
> polite or you are not.
> 
> I personally could also reply with insults, in case I wanted to do that, 
> but actually I don't.
> 
> But the UseNet is a tough place and I received thousands of really nasty 
> replies, which were full of hate and insults.
> 
> So, what shall one do?
> 
> Actually it is a good idea to stay calm, polite and on the topic.
> 
>>
>>  >>>> Actually we know (as the human race) what sunshine looks like in
>> space.
>>  >>
>>  >> This I wrote and stand by. Why did you edit out what I was answering?
>>  >
>>  > I can quote whatever I want to quote.
>>
>>  > Your statement is still present in the article, which you have 
>> written.
>>
>>  > But this article is mine and here I can decide, what I like to write
>> about.
>>
>>
>>
>> And as such I have every right to criticize it as I wish. I did that and
>> here you are whining about it.
> 
> Do what you think you should. Your activities are yours and you are 
> responsible for them, not me.
> 
> But for my activities I'm responsible and you are not.
>>
>>
>>  >>> Our usual experience is restricted to the lower atmosphere.
>>
>>  >> Nitpicking. The CDC reports that only 144 out of 100000 die of 
>> cancer.
>>  >> Does that make cancer unworthy of consideration? Do you have to
>>  >> experience cancer to understand it? Or is it sufficient that those 
>> who
>>  >> have experienced cancer have reported what that's like?
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > This statement has no obvious connection to the fact, that we humans
>> usually do not see sunshine in outer space.
>>
>>
>> Why didn't you say that instead of making the incorrect case that you
>> did? This discussion would have taken a different tone had you been
>> clear from the beginning. I hasten to add that you are still wrong.
> 
> 
> I personally think, that sunshine in space is a different type of wave, 
> which are called 'scalar waves', and that these waves are only converted 
> into sunshine inside the atmosphere.
> 
> We humans usually do not leave the atmosphere, hence cannot check, 
> whether or not my claim is correct (or not).
> 
> The picture is therefore: the sun emmits something, that causes sunshine 
> here on Earth, but isn't sunshine in space. Inbetween Sun and Earth 
> energy has other forms than what we see here on planet Earth.
>>
>>
>>  >> Your real problem appears to be that we have lots of information 
>> about
>>  >> how the earth is heated but we don't understand it well enough as 
>> yet.
>>
>>
>>  > Tell this to the IPCC.
>>
>>
>> If this were a legal proceeding my correct response at this point would
>> be, "argues facts not in evidence." Are we to guess precisely what that
>> comment means because it sure isn't clear as stated. And you do this
>> sort of thing all the time. I suspect that you don't know any better,
>> and that makes you someone best not to enter into a discussion with.
>>
> I personally think, that IPCC is the 'head of the snake' and produces 
> questionable theories, which were created to support something called 
> 'New World Order' by extracting money from the general public for 
> 'protection' (against climate change).
> 
> These theories include something commonly called 'andropogenic climate 
> change by CO2'.
> 
> I regard this theory as propaganda of a self-proclaimed 'elite', which 
> mocks the general public, while attempting to extract money for 'CO2 
> trade'.
> 
> I meant, that CO2 is the wrong stuff and 'CO2 protection' is like 
> 'barking up the wrong tree'.
> 
> (The real stuff to worry about is water).
> 
> TH
> 
> 
>

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-28 07:56 +0100
  Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-29 09:01 +0100
    Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 16:38 -0800
      Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 16:40 -0800
      Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-29 18:54 -0600
        Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-30 11:14 +0100
          Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 10:57 -0600
            Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 10:48 -0800
              Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:01 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:15 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:57 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 13:03 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 14:40 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 15:25 -0800
                Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 19:02 -0600
                Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 18:58 -0600
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-31 09:09 +0100
            Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-31 09:22 +0100
              Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-31 15:42 -0600
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 14:26 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 14:43 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 15:42 -0800
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-01 09:43 +0100
                Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 16:49 -0800
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-01 09:28 +0100
                Re: climate change Doodnath Sarti <ttha@dnhnahan.nh> - 2023-01-01 08:49 +0000
                Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 06:21 -0600
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 15:56 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:02 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:19 -0800
                Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:10 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:56 -0800
                Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-02 03:36 -0500
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-03 07:36 +0100
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 12:24 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 12:27 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:30 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:46 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:48 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 17:14 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 17:29 -0800
                Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 18:13 -0800
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-04 10:12 +0100
                Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-04 12:59 -0500
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-05 07:40 +0100
                Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 11:17 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 11:49 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 14:40 -0800
                Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 14:40 -0800
                Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-04 12:51 -0500
                Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-04 23:06 -0600
                Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-05 00:13 -0600
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-05 08:01 +0100
                Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-05 11:47 -0600
                Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 10:17 -0800
                Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-05 16:33 -0600
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-07 09:42 +0100
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 15:21 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 15:47 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 15:58 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-07 16:04 -0800
                Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-07 18:31 -0800
                Re: climate change Luigi Tumicelli <llei@cumiicli.lu> - 2023-01-08 13:47 +0000
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-02 08:06 +0100
                Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-02 10:22 -0600
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-03 07:27 +0100
                Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-02 10:43 -0600
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 14:54 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 14:57 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 15:03 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 15:10 -0800
                Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 17:29 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:20 -0800
                Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:24 -0600
                Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 19:27 -0600
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 18:02 -0800
                Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 18:20 -0800
                Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:48 -0600
                Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 21:29 -0600
                Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-02 08:28 +0100
                Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:29 -0600
                Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 19:26 -0600
                Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 06:16 -0600

csiph-web