Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #598703
| From | Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: climate change |
| Date | 2022-12-31 09:22 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <k1a9prFncfgU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (12 earlier) <k14vr3FsspbU1@mid.individual.net> <fa899694-3d06-4729-96d9-4b0b0493b3cdn@googlegroups.com> <k16r6oF76hkU2@mid.individual.net> <k17rvrFbuk6U1@mid.individual.net> <k18jkrFf1s0U1@mid.individual.net> |
Am 30.12.2022 um 17:57 schrieb whodat: > On 12/30/2022 4:14 AM, Thomas Heger wrote: >> Am 30.12.2022 um 01:54 schrieb whodat: >> >>>> The heating of the earth, caused by the sun, is produce by photons >>>> that are interacting with the air molecules or water molecules, and >>>> any object that the photons encounter. The air and water molecules >>>> that contact the sunlight (photons) are affected by the photons >>>> (energy) which results in the increases in the kinetic energy of the >>>> air and water molecules which causes heat. >> >> This explanation is most likely wrong. > > Whether it is right or wrong I did not write the above. Why did you > attribute it to me by editing? > > >> One reason to think so is, that you regard photons as real lasting >> entities like particles. > > So who was the "YOU"??? And is billions of light years not "long > lasting" in your lexicon? Your complain is about a very common habit in the UseNet. I have wrote a comment to something, which was not written by you, but by somebody else, who had written something, that you have quoted. Usually this is regarded as acceptable, because the news-reader provides enough information to connect a quote to the correct author. But here you complained, that I had answered to something, what you haven't written. Well, yes, the fact is true, but I still regard it as a legal behaviour, because I have not said, that you wrote, what I have quoted. >> But that would also 'materialise' energy, because photons are quanta >> of the em-radiation. >> >> But that would be a really bad idea, because energy is not a substance >> and not quantised into photons, which also do not behave like particles. > > > Raging confusion displayed here... No, it's a statement, to which you apperently do not agree. In that case it would be polite, if you would say, why you think, that my statement is wrong and in which aspect. > >>> Actually we know (as the human race) what sunshine looks like in space. > > This I wrote and stand by. Why did you edit out what I was answering? I can quote whatever I want to quote. Your statement is still present in the article, which you have written. But this article is mine and here I can decide, what I like to write about. ... > >> Our usual experience is restricted to the lower atmosphere. > > > Nitpicking. The CDC reports that only 144 out of 100000 die of cancer. > Does that make cancer unworthy of consideration? Do you have to > experience cancer to understand it? Or is it sufficient that those who > have experienced cancer have reported what that's like? This statement has no obvious connection to the fact, that we humans usually do not see sunshine in outer space. > Your real problem appears to be that we have lots of information about > how the earth is heated but we don't understand it well enough as yet. Tell this to the IPCC. >> A few humans have left the surface of planet Earth and actually know, >> how sunshine looks like, if seen from a spaceship in orbit. >> >> But that was certainly not a very common experience. > > Admit your error, you are human after all, no? And lets move on. > Ok, I admitt my error. (btw: which one?) TH
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-28 07:56 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-29 09:01 +0100
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 16:38 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-29 16:40 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-29 18:54 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-30 11:14 +0100
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 10:57 -0600
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 10:48 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:01 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:15 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 11:57 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 13:03 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 14:40 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-30 15:25 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 19:02 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-30 18:58 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-31 09:09 +0100
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2022-12-31 09:22 +0100
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2022-12-31 15:42 -0600
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 14:26 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 14:43 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2022-12-31 15:42 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-01 09:43 +0100
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-01 16:49 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-01 09:28 +0100
Re: climate change Doodnath Sarti <ttha@dnhnahan.nh> - 2023-01-01 08:49 +0000
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 06:21 -0600
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 15:56 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:02 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:19 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:10 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 17:56 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-02 03:36 -0500
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-03 07:36 +0100
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 12:24 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 12:27 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:30 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:46 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 13:48 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 17:14 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 17:29 -0800
Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-01-03 18:13 -0800
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-04 10:12 +0100
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-04 12:59 -0500
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-05 07:40 +0100
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-04 11:17 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 11:49 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-04 14:40 -0800
Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-01-05 14:40 -0800
Re: climate change Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-01-04 12:51 -0500
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-04 23:06 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-05 00:13 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-05 08:01 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-05 11:47 -0600
Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-01-05 10:17 -0800
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-05 16:33 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-02 08:06 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-02 10:22 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-03 07:27 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-02 10:43 -0600
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 14:54 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 14:57 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 15:03 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 15:10 -0800
Re: climate change carl eto <ccarleto4157990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-02 17:29 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 16:20 -0800
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:24 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 19:27 -0600
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 18:02 -0800
Re: climate change thor stoneman <consequently7990662@gmail.com> - 2023-01-01 18:20 -0800
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:48 -0600
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 21:29 -0600
Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-01-02 08:28 +0100
Re: climate change Tom Roberts <tjoberts137@sbcglobal.net> - 2023-01-01 20:29 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 19:26 -0600
Re: climate change whodat <whodaat@void.nowgre.com> - 2023-01-01 06:16 -0600
csiph-web