Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #601284

Re: climate change

From	Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de>
Newsgroups	sci.physics.relativity, sci.physics
Subject	Re: climate change
Date	2023-02-12 09:03 +0100
Message-ID	<k4rkpkF73tmU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <k4jn5hF18dU1@mid.individual.net> <4070449a-e1d0-4442-8ef0-94ba4b55d6ffn@googlegroups.com> <d182a4bf-5cdf-4b97-bf8f-bc79d3004879n@googlegroups.com> <63E72ADE.28F3@ix.netcom.com> <63E73F4A.4AB5@ix.netcom.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Am 11.02.2023 um 08:10 schrieb The Starmaker:
> The Starmaker wrote:
>>
>> Climate change is just another...religion.
>>
>> repent! repent!
>> IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!!
>>
>> the sky is falling.
>>
>> where is my umbrella, it looks like rain?
>>
>> repent! repent!
>> IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD!!!
>>
>>
>
> Science is a ....cosmic religion.
>
>
> The religion of the future will be a cosmic religion -- Albert Einstein
>
Predictions are actually difficult. A (pseudo) scientific religion is 
actually a possibility, but not particularily likely.

We have now already a phlethora of religions, sects and other believe 
systems and practically a multi-cultural society everywhere around the 
globe.

This is quite ok and we have no incentive to unify all believe systems 
into one.

Such a unification process cannot be had for free, but would cause 
unnecessary loss of life in epic proportions.

Therefore it would be a VERY BAD idea to even try to unify the beleive 
systems of the world by force.

We already know with certainty, that such a process would cause massive 
problems, which are by no means worth the result.

So it is far better to leave it as it is and separate believe, science 
and the state.

Then policy makers could manage the state and religion makers could 
compete about their 'sheep'.

And, please, do not even try to turn science into a religion. That would 
be the worst you could possibly do.

TH

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-05 22:06 -0800
  Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-09 08:54 +0100
    Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 08:57 -0800
      Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 09:49 -0800
        Re: climate change Paul Alsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 16:03 -0800
          Re: climate change Maciej Wozniak <maluwozniak@gmail.com> - 2023-02-09 22:25 -0800
        Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 21:42 -0800
          Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-11 08:01 +0100
          Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 23:10 -0800
            Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-12 09:03 +0100
          Re: climate change The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2023-02-10 23:13 -0800
      Re: climate change Thomas Heger <ttt_heg@web.de> - 2023-02-11 08:25 +0100
  Re: climate change Reinhardt Behm <rbehm@hushmail.com> - 2023-02-16 13:36 +0000

csiph-web