Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #743591
| From | Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| Subject | Re: about electronics |
| Date | 2026-05-01 00:41 +1000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <10svpmg$nuji$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <10srctv$3g7fi$1@dont-email.me> <10sre1d$3go58$1@dont-email.me> <agg4vk142bi43pvn0bm6qm2c37cqo8aqgt@4ax.com> <10svip5$lq2e$1@dont-email.me> <96p6vkdb353fq0bmmg2vbdf0p26suk3alg@4ax.com> |
On 1/05/2026 12:19 am, john larkin wrote: > On Thu, 30 Apr 2026 22:43:08 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> > wrote: > >> On 30/04/2026 3:39 am, john larkin wrote: >>> On Tue, 28 Apr 2026 15:57:47 -0700, Don Y >>> <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote: >>> >>>> On 4/28/2026 3:38 PM, Buzz McCool wrote: >>>>> An interesting ratio. Maybe screens to bench power supplies would be >>>>> a better measure of academic analog electronics rigor as oscopes in >>>>> an educational setting might be the USB type that plugs into a >>>>> computer. >>>> >>>> There's far less demand for electrical engineers. Too much is >>>> "slap together" from prefabbed modules -- designed by a relative >>>> few people feeding multiple customer products. And, their efforts >>>> in typical product designs are relatively small (man-hours). >>>> >>>> By contrast, the software/firmware in YOUR product is almost >>>> certainly not the same as in some other product (even if you >>>> leverage something like a Linux kernel). >>>> >>>> Electrical Engineer salaries: 64,511 - 137,087 [$87,988] >>>> Software Engineer: 75,449 - 209,993 [132,417] >>>> >>>> (composite of a variety of market surveys) >>>> >>>> There is downward pressure on pay for entry/early career >>>> EE/SEs and considerable upward pressure on more experienced. >>>> >>> >>> I wish we could hire good EEs for $137K. >> >> It might be easier if you didn't interview them yourself. > > Good point. My company would hire more cheap duds. They might also get to hire people that your antics could have put off. Asking potential hires really simple questions about electronics might save you from hiring a cheap dud, but it might put off somebody who might think that you hadn't bothered to read their CV (or worse, might think that you had not been able to understand it). Job interviews are a two way street. The interviewee gets an insight into the people they might end up having to work with. -- Bill Sloman, Sydney -- Bill Sloman, Sydney
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-24 08:55 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-25 02:14 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-24 09:39 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-25 03:32 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-24 10:46 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-25 14:44 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-25 08:03 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-26 02:28 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-25 10:56 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-26 21:27 +1000
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-26 21:11 +1000
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-26 21:16 +1000
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-26 21:50 +1000
Re: about electronics Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-25 17:52 +0000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-25 11:17 -0700
Re: about electronics Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-26 17:12 +0000
Re: about electronics someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-04-26 05:45 +0000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-26 03:29 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-26 20:55 +1000
Re: about electronics Someone <864c855e3d64399dc06fa30ebb75526c2c2e73db7216b16a3d4cf03e8a52ec3b@example.com> - 2026-04-28 20:15 +0000
Re: about electronics Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-28 16:39 -0400
Re: about electronics someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-04-30 05:30 +0000
Re: about electronics Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-30 11:19 +0000
Re: about electronics someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-05-05 18:15 +0000
Re: about electronics Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-05-05 19:10 +0000
Re: about electronics Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-26 12:53 +0000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-26 07:57 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-27 01:33 +1000
Re: about electronics Someone <864c855e3d64399dc06fa30ebb75526c2c2e73db7216b16a3d4cf03e8a52ec3b@example.com> - 2026-04-28 20:15 +0000
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-29 14:36 +1000
Re: about electronics Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-24 10:10 -0700
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-24 10:38 -0700
Re: about electronics Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-24 11:22 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-25 15:07 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-25 08:14 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-26 02:20 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-25 11:08 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-26 21:34 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-27 13:24 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-28 17:44 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-28 09:22 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-29 03:24 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-28 18:58 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-29 14:27 +1000
Re: about electronics bitrex <user@example.net> - 2026-04-24 23:20 -0400
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-04-24 21:50 -0700
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-25 08:26 -0700
Re: about electronics Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-25 17:53 +0000
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-04-25 11:34 -0700
Re: about electronics Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-26 16:51 +0000
Re: about electronics someone <2a59d59e3809f827ce709d3815e3950eef4a6a93af5557a93a7fdfba71460843@example.com> - 2026-04-26 05:45 +0000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-26 03:39 -0700
Re: about electronics Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-28 15:38 -0700
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-04-28 15:57 -0700
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-28 19:07 -0700
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-29 10:39 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-30 22:43 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-30 07:19 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-05-01 00:41 +1000
Re: about electronics JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-04-30 15:54 +0100
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-30 09:27 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-05-01 03:26 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-30 11:38 -0700
Re: about electronics JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2026-04-30 18:45 +0100
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-04-30 13:00 -0700
Re: about electronics Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-05-01 21:24 +0000
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-05-02 16:27 +1000
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-30 11:40 -0700
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-05-03 14:35 -0700
Re: about electronics john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-05-03 14:41 -0700
Re: about electronics joegwinn@comcast.net - 2026-05-03 19:54 -0400
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-05-03 17:53 -0700
Re: about electronics joegwinn@comcast.net - 2026-05-04 19:54 -0400
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-05-04 17:33 -0700
Re: about electronics joegwinn@comcast.net - 2026-05-05 13:35 -0400
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-05-05 14:08 -0700
Re: about electronics Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-05-05 21:29 +0000
Re: about electronics Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-05-05 14:43 -0700
Re: about electronics Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-05-06 15:58 +1000
csiph-web