Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10394

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

Path	csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.java
Subject	Re: OpenJFX 9 integration
Date	Wed, 04 Apr 2018 16:10:01 +0200
Message-ID	<vARgR-7uD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<uzUji-3ov-407@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDmsq-6XZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDxxv-674-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vAIZX-1Ba-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vALuN-3bH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vALXP-3CU-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-java@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Apr 4 14:03:56 2018
Old-Return-Path	<apo@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight	using cached result; rate: -5
Organization	debian.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kDZyB8wxqAvqrbkYu5zJzE0YhhIhnILIh"
X-Mailing-List	<debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20780
List-ID	<debian-java.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/bf66c257-ef69-18a0-24b3-a719ef60320c@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	75
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:03:33 +0200
X-Original-Message-ID	<bf66c257-ef69-18a0-24b3-a719ef60320c@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<7648af40-f4a8-e1f6-dd17-8c6f9deb5b05@apache.org> <25b2b8de-a126-cf6c-5adb-971983e5d739@debian.org> <a4b5457c-bdaf-b116-ed6b-2d97f2c398a1@apache.org> <f763a2a7-9b16-9411-d613-1056c9b03b76@xs4all.nl> <74709168-f2c2-da6e-b80b-c7eab2fb2593@debian.org> <16371f39-2d75-b7a0-3958-3ce8c338dd79@apache.org>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:10394

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 04.04.2018 um 10:24 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> 
>> I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and openjfx is
>> split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support for some time.
> 
> +1, Oracle has announced last month [1] that JavaFX would be decoupled
> from Java 11, so my integration plan with the OpenJDK package is moot.
> 
> I wonder if it's worth uploading a new openjfx-9 package now (FTP
> masters would have to review a fairly big package that would be obsolete
> on arrival) or waiting for the 11 release in September before moving on.

Unfortunately disabling JavaFX is not an option for packages that
heavily rely on it, e.g. pdfsam or netbeans. As a workaround I could
force OpenJDK 8 for those packages to make them usable again provided
OpenJDK 8 will not be removed before Java 11 is ready.

Regards,

Markus

Thread

OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
              Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200

csiph-web