Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10389

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/23/2017 01:00 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 22/10/2017 à 12:57, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>> (C) looks like the best workaround for now.  Looking at at least four security
>> releases per year, and maybe the double amount of package uploads, the OpenJDK
>> package has a higher upload frequency anyway.  There is however a risk that an
>> OpenJDK (security) update won't build anymore with a prebuilt OpenJFX (not sure
>> if that is a real issue).  In any case, the OpenJDK package should have a build
>> profile to build without OpenJFX support.
> 
> Ok let's do that. The name of the package is open to discussion, as well
> as how the OpenJFX files will be distributed between the openjdk-9-*
> packages.
> 
> For the name, since OpenJFX is now clearly becoming an extension of
> OpenJDK I was thinking about naming the source package
> "openjdk-9-openjfx" or "openjdk-9-jfx", and appending "-build" to the
> binary package. What would be a good location for installing the build
> directory?
> 
> Regarding the distribution of the files, the lib/modules file of
> openjdk-9-jre-headless will now contain the JavaFX classes, but the
> native libraries should go into openjdk-9-jre. javapackager and
> ant-javafx.jar would go into openjdk-9-jdk-headless.

Can progress be made with the above? Or is it blocked on lack of
feedback from Matthias?

A number of packages fail to build now that openjdk-9 is the default-jdk
and are forced to disable openjfx support to keep their packages in testing.

Kind Regards,

Bas

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
              Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200

csiph-web