Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10394

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

From Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.java
Subject Re: OpenJFX 9 integration
Date 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
Message-ID <vARgR-7uD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <uDmsq-6XZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDxxv-674-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vAIZX-1Ba-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vALuN-3bH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vALXP-3CU-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization debian.org

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 04.04.2018 um 10:24 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg:
> Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> 
>> I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and openjfx is
>> split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support for some time.
> 
> +1, Oracle has announced last month [1] that JavaFX would be decoupled
> from Java 11, so my integration plan with the OpenJDK package is moot.
> 
> I wonder if it's worth uploading a new openjfx-9 package now (FTP
> masters would have to review a fairly big package that would be obsolete
> on arrival) or waiting for the 11 release in September before moving on.

Unfortunately disabling JavaFX is not an option for packages that
heavily rely on it, e.g. pdfsam or netbeans. As a workaround I could
force OpenJDK 8 for those packages to make them usable again provided
OpenJDK 8 will not be removed before Java 11 is ready.

Regards,

Markus

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
              Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200

csiph-web