Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10394
| From | Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJFX 9 integration |
| Date | 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vARgR-7uD-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <uDmsq-6XZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDxxv-674-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vAIZX-1Ba-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vALuN-3bH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vALXP-3CU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | debian.org |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Am 04.04.2018 um 10:24 schrieb Emmanuel Bourg: > Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit : > >> I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and openjfx is >> split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support for some time. > > +1, Oracle has announced last month [1] that JavaFX would be decoupled > from Java 11, so my integration plan with the OpenJDK package is moot. > > I wonder if it's worth uploading a new openjfx-9 package now (FTP > masters would have to review a fairly big package that would be obsolete > on arrival) or waiting for the 11 release in September before moving on. Unfortunately disabling JavaFX is not an option for packages that heavily rely on it, e.g. pdfsam or netbeans. As a workaround I could force OpenJDK 8 for those packages to make them usable again provided OpenJDK 8 will not be removed before Java 11 is ready. Regards, Markus
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200
csiph-web