Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10111

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

Show all headers | View raw

Le 22/10/2017 à 12:57, Matthias Klose a écrit :

> Are you aware if upstream is aware of these issues, and if they intend to stop
> using internal OpenJDK APIs? Any plans to get rid off the single file approach
> for the database files?

I don't know. At least they are aware that OpenJFX fails to build with a
raw OpenJDK not including OpenJFX and they seem willing to address that
issue.


> (C) looks like the best workaround for now.  Looking at at least four security
> releases per year, and maybe the double amount of package uploads, the OpenJDK
> package has a higher upload frequency anyway.  There is however a risk that an
> OpenJDK (security) update won't build anymore with a prebuilt OpenJFX (not sure
> if that is a real issue).  In any case, the OpenJDK package should have a build
> profile to build without OpenJFX support.

Ok let's do that. The name of the package is open to discussion, as well
as how the OpenJFX files will be distributed between the openjdk-9-*
packages.

For the name, since OpenJFX is now clearly becoming an extension of
OpenJDK I was thinking about naming the source package
"openjdk-9-openjfx" or "openjdk-9-jfx", and appending "-build" to the
binary package. What would be a good location for installing the build
directory?

Regarding the distribution of the files, the lib/modules file of
openjdk-9-jre-headless will now contain the JavaFX classes, but the
native libraries should go into openjdk-9-jre. javapackager and
ant-javafx.jar would go into openjdk-9-jdk-headless.

Emmanuel Bourg

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
              Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200

csiph-web