Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10393

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 11:15:59AM +0200, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
> On 2018-04-04 10:24, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> > Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit :
> > 
> > > I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and
> > > openjfx is
> > > split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support
> > > for some time.
> > 
> > +1, Oracle has announced last month [1] that JavaFX would be decoupled
> > from Java 11, so my integration plan with the OpenJDK package is moot.
> > 
> > I wonder if it's worth uploading a new openjfx-9 package now (FTP
> > masters would have to review a fairly big package that would be obsolete
> > on arrival) or waiting for the 11 release in September before moving on.
> 
> It's probably not worth it, although having at least 5 months until the
> openjfx RC bugs can be fixed (when the package doesn't work without it) is a
> bit long.
> 
> I'm personally fine with disabling openjfx in josm for the time being.

On behalf of jabref 4.x and the new r-deps we have been working to get
into Debian, ouch!  Think we'll have to find some other way (PPAs or
something) to support JabRef users.

That said, I understand the decision.  My question is how much time do
we think we'll have between the acceptance of an openjfx package and the
release.  6 months?  A year?

Thanks,
tony

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
              Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200

csiph-web