Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10113

Re: OpenJFX 9 integration

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Why not keep the source package name as "openjfx" and then name the binary package "openjdk-9-jfx"?

Emmanuel Bourg 於 2017年10月23日 07:00 寫道:
> Le 22/10/2017 à 12:57, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>
>> Are you aware if upstream is aware of these issues, and if they intend to stop
>> using internal OpenJDK APIs? Any plans to get rid off the single file approach
>> for the database files?
> I don't know. At least they are aware that OpenJFX fails to build with a
> raw OpenJDK not including OpenJFX and they seem willing to address that
> issue.
>
>
>> (C) looks like the best workaround for now.  Looking at at least four security
>> releases per year, and maybe the double amount of package uploads, the OpenJDK
>> package has a higher upload frequency anyway.  There is however a risk that an
>> OpenJDK (security) update won't build anymore with a prebuilt OpenJFX (not sure
>> if that is a real issue).  In any case, the OpenJDK package should have a build
>> profile to build without OpenJFX support.
> Ok let's do that. The name of the package is open to discussion, as well
> as how the OpenJFX files will be distributed between the openjdk-9-*
> packages.
>
> For the name, since OpenJFX is now clearly becoming an extension of
> OpenJDK I was thinking about naming the source package
> "openjdk-9-openjfx" or "openjdk-9-jfx", and appending "-build" to the
> binary package. What would be a good location for installing the build
> directory?
>
> Regarding the distribution of the files, the lib/modules file of
> openjdk-9-jre-headless will now contain the JavaFX classes, but the
> native libraries should go into openjdk-9-jre. javapackager and
> ant-javafx.jar would go into openjdk-9-jdk-headless.
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>

Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
    Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
      Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
        Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
          Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
              Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
            Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
  Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200

csiph-web