Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.java > #10392
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.java |
| Subject | Re: OpenJFX 9 integration |
| Date | Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:20:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <vAMKd-4hn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <uzUji-3ov-407@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDmsq-6XZ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <uDxxv-674-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vAIZX-1Ba-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vALuN-3bH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <vALXP-3CU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-java@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-java-request@lists.debian.org Wed Apr 4 09:16:27 2018 |
| Old-Return-Path | <sebastic@xs4all.nl> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-7.7 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | DYN_NJABL=ERR(0) NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 BL_NJABL=ERR(-1.5) CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .xs4all. - helo: .lb2-smtp-cloud9.xs4all. - helo-domain: .xs4all.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_HELO(DOMAIN)=-2; rate: -7 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Sender | sebastic@xs4all.nl |
| User-Agent | XS4ALL Webmail |
| X-Cmae-Envelope | MS4wfD84j6uA880IF0vzIvFaVOLHRxJoV8qp/kTCrt2IBkDvnmjWL8pN0u0H5PN7D1TF4+p0duuDR4sy0HYHSWhIP7dA6cMybWLWhvFI5E8Pvz+0LNZUpDgx m/zDCvlPpa+2hE4jAOqo0o5CMSkmb+xT9OaQREnDhTvmJtzz0xP/0if3M9H5I8QJdX95yjWshRpStI0bfnpKrCwSErpXXImios0W0E6aVOTZUHIriMA/Cu/k |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-java@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/20778 |
| List-ID | <debian-java.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/a6811ed85c40ec42c4aa3775660a855b@xs4all.nl |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 26 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 04 Apr 2018 11:15:59 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <a6811ed85c40ec42c4aa3775660a855b@xs4all.nl> |
| X-Original-References | <7648af40-f4a8-e1f6-dd17-8c6f9deb5b05@apache.org> <25b2b8de-a126-cf6c-5adb-971983e5d739@debian.org> <a4b5457c-bdaf-b116-ed6b-2d97f2c398a1@apache.org> <f763a2a7-9b16-9411-d613-1056c9b03b76@xs4all.nl> <74709168-f2c2-da6e-b80b-c7eab2fb2593@debian.org> <16371f39-2d75-b7a0-3958-3ce8c338dd79@apache.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.java:10392 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2018-04-04 10:24, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 04/04/2018 à 09:48, Matthias Klose a écrit : > >> I wouldn't spend any time on that. We are moving towards 11, and >> openjfx is >> split out there. So yes, maybe packages have to drop openjfx support >> for some time. > > +1, Oracle has announced last month [1] that JavaFX would be decoupled > from Java 11, so my integration plan with the OpenJDK package is moot. > > I wonder if it's worth uploading a new openjfx-9 package now (FTP > masters would have to review a fairly big package that would be > obsolete > on arrival) or waiting for the 11 release in September before moving > on. It's probably not worth it, although having at least 5 months until the openjfx RC bugs can be fixed (when the package doesn't work without it) is a bit long. I'm personally fine with disabling openjfx in josm for the time being. Kind Regards, Bas
Back to linux.debian.maint.java | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-13 00:40 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-17 17:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-17 21:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 13:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-22 17:30 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 21:00 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Mykola Nikishov <mn@mn.com.ua> - 2017-10-22 23:00 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2017-10-22 23:10 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-23 01:10 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 09:10 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2017-10-24 12:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 07:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 10:00 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Emmanuel Bourg <ebourg@apache.org> - 2018-04-04 10:30 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> - 2018-04-04 11:20 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration tony mancill <tmancill@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 15:50 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration Markus Koschany <apo@debian.org> - 2018-04-04 16:10 +0200
Re: OpenJFX 9 integration David Goodenough <david.goodenough@linkchoose.co.uk> - 2017-10-24 07:40 +0200
csiph-web