Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #105370
| From | "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution |
| Date | 2017-04-24 16:18 +0100 |
| Organization | ~ |
| Message-ID | <op.yy7gtkzejs98qf@red.lan> (permalink) |
| References | (15 earlier) <D5229034.A10D2%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy6atlsijs98qf@red.lan> <D522928C.A1108%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yy7fbgg0js98qf@red.lan> <odl41g$oh9$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 16:05:15 +0100, knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > On 4/24/2017 10:46 AM, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 01:19:08 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On 4/23/17, 5:11 PM, in article op.yy6atlsijs98qf@red.lan, "James >>> Wilkinson >>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, 24 Apr 2017 01:09:08 +0100, Snit >>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/23/17, 4:58 PM, in article >>>>> 230420171958389453%nospam@nospam.invalid, >>>>> "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> In article <D5228CC5.A10C0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit >>>>>> <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> What matters to me is I paid for a 10MP camera and I get a 2.5MP >>>>>>>> output. >>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>> will never buy Fuji again. Canon did not let me down, I will go >>>>>>>> with them >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> the future. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Can you post an unaltered image from it? What camera is it? >>>>>> >>>>>> he said it was a finepix s1000fd: >>>>>> <http://www.fujifilm.com/support/digital_cameras/specifications/s/finepi >>>>>> >>>>>> x_s1000fd/> >>>>> >>>>> At least according to that he is wrong. >>>> >>>> It may state 10MP, but the output is not as good as other 10MP cameras. >>> >>> That I can believe... remember, there are many other factors: light >>> sensitivity, quality of sensors, post processing in the camera >>> (assuming you >>> are not using RAW), etc. >> >> RAW has the same crappy output. Zooming right in you can see groups of >> 4 pixels are almost identical. It's too precise for me to think it's >> the lens. >> >>>> I can reduce it to 2.5MP in Photoshop, then increase it back to 10MP, >>>> and get >>>> the same result. >>> >>> Put one on top of the other set the top to "difference" and you will >>> likely >>> see some difference. Might need to increase contrast. >> >> Not a lot of difference. It should be four times more information. >> >>>> That means the manufacturer is LYING. Their hardware is not capable of >>>> producing 10 million pixels. I had a 6MP Canon that made better >>>> pictures than >>>> the Fuji 10MP. Fuji are con artists. >>> >>> Quality and MP are not the same. >> >> Agreed, but what I'm seeing is clearly a lack of MP. >> > There is more to a picture than the number of pixels. Today, people > focus on pixel counts instead of optics. If the optics can not focus > the images in the plane of the detector, no amount of pixel will give > you a good picture. ie the image will always be out of focus, and the > edges will appear fuzzy. What a 10MP camera will record is a fuzzy > picture contaning 10mp. > > As an example I have a 1.3 pixel camera in my phone and a 3.1 pixel > camera in my tablet. Because of the poor quality of optics in the > tablet, I use the phone exclsively. The phone can be used to copy the > image of a page of text and the text is readable. The tablet can not, > regardless of how you manipulate the image, distances to the page, etc > you can not get a readable image. Agreed, but I've only seen shit like that on a phone - my antique Samsung smartphone has a lot of noise in it for example. Random dots like when we used to have analogue TV with poor reception. All digital cameras (although I've never bought a very cheap one) have good optics. They're limited by the MP. -- Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same. -- Oscar Wilde
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 18:47 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 13:56 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 20:01 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:05 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 20:11 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:16 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 21:21 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 16:34 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-23 11:22 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 19:56 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:05 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 20:09 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 15:16 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 21:23 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 16:34 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 12:20 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-23 21:20 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 16:34 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 14:34 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 00:48 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 16:54 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 19:58 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 01:04 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 17:05 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 01:08 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 17:12 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 20:17 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 15:47 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 20:17 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 17:30 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 17:09 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 01:11 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 20:17 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 17:31 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 20:53 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 18:43 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 22:01 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 19:03 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-24 09:58 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 09:29 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 17:19 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 15:46 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution knuttle <keith_nuttle@sbcglobal.net> - 2017-04-24 11:05 -0400
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 16:18 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 09:31 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Rene Lamontagne <rlamont@shaw.ca> - 2017-04-24 10:10 -0500
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 16:19 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-24 09:31 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 00:59 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-23 17:11 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-23 17:03 -0700
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-24 01:07 +0100
Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> - 2017-04-23 17:26 -0700
csiph-web