Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03
Date	2017-05-03 10:09 -0700
Message-ID	<D52F5CE1.A348C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <D52E29DA.A3224%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yzmnuao9js98qf@red.lan> <D52E432C.A3254%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <sandman-194a74971eb73d7e8c00cabe9e3f4b48@individual.net> <op.yznpf0uvjs98qf@red.lan>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/3/17, 2:46 AM, in article op.yznpf0uvjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 03 May 2017 08:01:01 +0100, Sandman <mr@sandman.net> wrote:
> 
>> In article <D52E432C.A3254%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote:
>> 
>>> [2649] Or what the script-troller and stalker are doing with their flooding
>>> [2649] nonsense.
>> 
>> [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m)
>> [X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t)
>> 
>>> [2650] I posted some computer-generated gibberish like that a few years ago.
>>> [2651] Some of those who troll me, including the script-troller, insisted it
>>> [2651] was something other than gibberish.
>> 
>> [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/j5vqmx4)
>> [X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t)
>> 
>> 
>> Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09):
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>  troll            3/374 |
> 
> 3 out of 374 doesn't seem like much.

What he is doing is going out of his way to prove I am correct about his
obsession, his tracking of his own trolling, and his empty accusations he
demands I spend time responding to.

In other words: he has mastered the art of scripting meta-trolling and it
brings him joy. He likes bringing harm to the world more than he cares to
bring happiness. 

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 20:04 +0100
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 12:19 -0700
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Ron C <r.capik@verizon.net> - 2017-05-02 15:51 -0400
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 21:07 +0100
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 13:59 -0700
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-02 21:14 +0100
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 14:07 -0700
        Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 01:07 +0100
          Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-02 18:54 -0700
            Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 15:38 +0100
              Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:02 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-03 16:22 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 13:40 -0700
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-03 17:01 -0400
                Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 14:25 -0700
        Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-05-03 07:01 +0000
          Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 10:46 +0100
            Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:09 -0700
              Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-05-03 22:06 +0000
                Re: Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-03 23:16 +0100
                Re: Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 15:21 -0700
                Re: Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-04 00:19 +0100
                Re: Snit digest 436 / 2017-05-04 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 16:46 -0700
              Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-08 00:04 +0100
                Re: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 16:08 -0700

csiph-web