Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #106182
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.mac.system |
| Subject | More proof for the script troller |
| Date | 2017-05-03 10:13 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D52F5DC1.A348E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
Again, packaged together so as to not do as you do and spam COLA (and in your case flood COLA and other groups)... here are more examples of you ad others fabricating stories about me and sharing your fantasies and otherwise engaging in obsessive and absurd trolling. Keep in mind this is GREATLY reduced from the past... right now there is a commendable "pact" in COLA to work to not troll me (with the only way many of the herd knowing how to do so to not respond to me at all). > Subject: Re: Snit digest 429 / 2017-05-02 > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 7:16 AM > From: Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy > Conversation: Snit digest 429 / 2017-05-02 > > On 2017-05-03 8:31 AM, chrisv wrote: > >>> [2627] You are comfortable with dishonestly attributing words to me that I > >>> [2627] did not say. > > > > Can't you just STFU, you broken-record attention-starved loser? > > > > Sheesh! > > +1 > > He should create a Youtube page talking about what the tech world > "needs" to do. He'd get more responses there than here anyway and he > might even make some money off it to complement his welfare cheque. > > -- > Silver Slimer > OpenMedia & EFF Member > Gab.ai: @silverslimer > > Death to Islam > > Subject: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 12:01 AM > From: Sandman <mr@sandman.net> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech > Conversation: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 > > In article <D52E432C.A3254%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: > > > [2649] Or what the script-troller and stalker are doing with their flooding > > [2649] nonsense. > > [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > [X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t) > > > [2650] I posted some computer-generated gibberish like that a few years ago. > > [2651] Some of those who troll me, including the script-troller, insisted it > > [2651] was something other than gibberish. > > [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/j5vqmx4) > [X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t) > > > Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > troll 3/374 | > > -- > Sandman > > > Subject: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 12:01 AM > From: Sandman <mr@sandman.net> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech > Conversation: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 > > In article <D52E432C.A3254%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: > > > [2649] Or what the script-troller and stalker are doing with their flooding > > [2649] nonsense. > > [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > [X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t) > > > [2650] I posted some computer-generated gibberish like that a few years ago. > > [2651] Some of those who troll me, including the script-troller, insisted it > > [2651] was something other than gibberish. > > [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/j5vqmx4) > [X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t) > > > Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > troll 3/374 | > > -- > Sandman > > > Subject: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 12:01 AM > From: Sandman <mr@sandman.net> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech > Conversation: Snit digest 435 / 2017-05-03 > > In article <D52E432C.A3254%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: > > > [2649] Or what the script-troller and stalker are doing with their flooding > > [2649] nonsense. > > [X] Lying (http://tinyurl.com/gtdd77m) > [X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t) > > > [2650] I posted some computer-generated gibberish like that a few years ago. > > [2651] Some of those who troll me, including the script-troller, insisted it > > [2651] was something other than gibberish. > > [X] Dig up arguments from the past (http://tinyurl.com/j5vqmx4) > [X] Unsubstantiated claims (http://tinyurl.com/hkfd76t) > > > Snit summary of meaningless phrases (since 2015-12-09): > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > troll 3/374 | > > -- > Sandman > > > Subject: Re: More proof for the script-troller > Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 11:18 PM > From: Sandman <mr@sandman.net> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy > Conversation: More proof for the script-troller > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > In article <D52E4D5A.A3299%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: > > > Here the script-troller is obsessing over me > > <snip posts of me responding to Snit> > > So, someone "obsessing" over you *IS* someone responding to you, huh? Do make > up your mind. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZCXYmAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRia8IAM9bLcHFwAbKnywofTNrDrDw > D67nuWVaoRisAcFNwqlk7MezK9PSN+oC1m3DIuzr/5tCiSE2yJEZ+loX+vqVeZLR > IQHsaOr9au3v5EpTC4XdtPd5VR4qB2d0EE6AHb+u3R8YxMAyaL9M2qaeh4oc4g8Q > 8KXmmdjQ640FVZbS8uEwKR8kiNzojmaNBtXgw9Z1VWURe6487fnkC8jrfodeNH2c > eeX0cASZz8Tml/6kSov/ja0TaoNQo51DUsRozE7tTi8mIGLsb9XfrOq3mmrQIT4V > opmxpLnXCr9oDd/0pgNsOMpqIBmEvisgg/6HW9POWGGChrWmtozbZMNoEVrexzU= > =FNk4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > Sandman > > > Subject: Re: Poor "Snit" > Date: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 at 11:17 PM > From: Sandman <mr@sandman.net> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy > Conversation: Poor "Snit" > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > In article <D52E4FB2.A32B3%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>, Snit wrote: > > > > > > > > > DFS: > > > > > > > > 3) "With OS X I get all the best commercial > > > > > > > > applications plus all the power of unix." > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sandman: > > > > > > > Also true. > > > > > > > > > > > > Snit: > > > > > > Nope. It gets many of the commercial applications, but > > > > > > Windows gets more. Far more. > > > > > > > > > > Sandman: > > > > > Now, if that just contradicted anything I said above, > > > > > there might be a point to your post, but since it does, there > > > > > is no such point. > > > > > > > > Snit: > > > > The point is your technical claim is incorrect. > > > > > > Sandman: > > > Incorrect. > > > > OK, then back it. Show that all commercial Windows apps which might > > be considered "best" for what they do are available for macOS. > > Should I back my claim or the claim you just made? > > > Of course, you never will given how that is just insane. Your claim > > is simply wrong. > > Incorrect. > > > > > Snit: > > > > There are LOTS of commercial Windows applications which do not > > > > have Mac versions > > > > > > Sandman: > > > A claim by you that does not in any way contradict my claim above. > > > > Notice how you snipped the sentence in half to take away the context > > of "best" > > You choose poorly: > > Automatic reinsertion of snipped text by Snit: > - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Snit: > > and this includes many which could be considered the > > "best" for a use-case. > > Given the fact that "best" is subjective, this is irrelevant verbiage from > you yet again. How many posts will you keep this up instead of just admitting > that you had missed the qualifier "best" which is highly subjective? > > Your proper response here, if you're honest and honourable, is to just say: > > "True, I missed that you wrote 'best' applications, and that that is > obviously a subjective opinion of yours with which I can't argue in any case. > My bad, have a nice day". > > Choose wisely. > > - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Snippage reinserter v1.0 > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZCXXbAAoJECFEwfBaA+jRBRAH/R+ltAzgmLWrXuONZvVvAhf9 > 5qFFKiaxtWwXCOh/NCymcLaBbct/zAWj43iFeSbgmwdP/0XBXmg2QYXJ8Jo5rsT5 > RDPfAR/Eml60vDit7mu5hPJLY7WIGWjDxDDu/8N6T6UsDvk8/xcsBxil4yCEWuFU > +6lCZMfi/cWp2UjxRrWeOaWJAqDgibcftg20TT02A3Cvp0KIKTPIDhXNz/UcgtAa > XF0TBt/YvA1ErUlRh+G0OdnUku4kt0eJFbfZtc3a40Pq+GQWAP8iirVMYWydNoQF > fEQB04CteEZ2+yd3OCCdf/B6kjdQDRsnJ+sbFQV6KlEUfhfI5O91J71C7mbYsLk= > =bII/ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > -- > Sandman > > > Subject: Re: M$ ChromeBook ... err ... MacBook killer > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 5:20 AM > From: Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy > Conversation: M$ ChromeBook ... err ... MacBook killer > > On 2017-05-02 2:59 PM, RonB wrote: > > On 2017-05-02, Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> wrote: > >> > >> Hopefully, they're going to fill the Windows Store with some decent > >> software to ensure that this piece of hardware is a success. As it is, > >> most software in there is pure garbage. > > > > I guess that's the eventual plan, but (besides Microsoft Office) Microsoft > > can't really "build the app market" on their own. And, if the market isn't > > there yet, it's not likely that a lot of software publishers will be anxious > > to change the way they sell software. So it's kind of a Catch-22 situtation. > > For some software developers, selling through the Windows Store would be > beneficial. I can't tell you how many fake versions of software I find > all over the place which end up giving the original developer a bad > reputation. If they sold through the Windows Store, they might have to > share profits but at least they could be sure that the user gets the > real deal rather than some malware masquerading as a useful program. > > It's like getting Snit when you're a woman searching for a real man. > > -- > Silver Slimer > OpenMedia & EFF Member > Gab.ai: @silverslimer > > Death to Islam > > Subject: Re: GNU/Linux DIY Package Management > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 9:24 AM > From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy > Conversation: GNU/Linux DIY Package Management > > On 2017-05-03, Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> wrote: > > On 2017-05-02 2:32 PM, RonB wrote: > >> On 2017-05-02, Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote: > >>> On 2017-05-02, F. Russell <fr@random.info> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> That's GNU/Linux. Simple tools that together build a great system > >>>> that only REAL MEN can appreciate. > >>> > >>> What about women? > >> > >> They like Macs? > > > > My wife can't stand them. > > I was being facetious. I (personally) can't stand Macs, but a lot of good > people use Macs because they kind of got a reputation for being the choice > of the artistic, as opposed to the bland "number crunching" Windows > machines. Not everyone who uses a Mac is an obsessive crank, like "Snit." > > -- > Zero Tolerance for iCultists and WinTrolls > > > Subject: Re: Snit digest 429 / 2017-05-02 > Date: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 at 5:31 AM > From: chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> > Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy > Conversation: Snit digest 429 / 2017-05-02 > > >> [2627] You are comfortable with dishonestly attributing words to me that I > >> [2627] did not say. > > Can't you just STFU, you broken-record attention-starved loser? > > Sheesh! > > -- > "Telling lies about how Linux can replace Windows for most people is > no way to go through life son." - "True Linux advocate" Hadron Quark > > > > > -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next | Find similar
More proof for the script troller Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-03 10:13 -0700
csiph-web