Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #63096 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-26 08:41 -0500 |
| Last post | 2025-01-03 11:32 +0100 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 42 participants
Thread has 1322 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1322 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-26 08:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-26 17:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 10:57 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-26 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 11:59 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-26 20:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 12:37 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 14:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2024-12-27 10:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 16:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-28 07:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-28 15:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 14:51 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 11:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 17:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 14:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2024-12-29 16:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 17:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 04:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 09:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 08:40 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-30 23:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 18:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-31 03:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 20:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 10:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-31 06:04 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 09:39 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 17:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-31 18:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 13:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:22 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-27 07:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 08:00 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:52 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 10:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-27 06:34 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:10 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 08:22 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:04 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-28 17:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 12:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 12:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 19:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> - 2024-12-28 19:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-28 23:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 23:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 09:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 22:02 +0000
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 18:56 -0500
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 04:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 10:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-31 02:49 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 13:23 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-29 21:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lem Novantotto <Lem@none.invalid> - 2024-12-28 20:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-29 01:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-29 01:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 21:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 14:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-29 08:15 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 07:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 10:15 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-31 07:31 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:40 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 01:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-01 07:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-01 21:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 21:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 23:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 02:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:30 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 01:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 03:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:32 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:13 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 06:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 08:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 14:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-03 11:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 16:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 13:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 01:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:13 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-04 06:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-04 10:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-04 15:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 23:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 12:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 09:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-05 10:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-04 13:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-04 15:54 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 00:11 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-05 10:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-05 13:22 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 08:49 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 15:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 19:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-06 15:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-06 16:20 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 17:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 08:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 09:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 11:26 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 11:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 13:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 13:30 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 13:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 14:07 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-07 16:35 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-07 21:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-08 09:45 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-07 22:47 +0000
Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 02:49 +0000
Re: Time machine backups vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 04:22 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 14:25 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:21 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:58 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 14:37 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:25 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-01-08 18:28 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 19:24 +0000
Re: Time machine backups vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 20:27 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:05 +0100
Re: Time machine backups "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:47 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:19 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:51 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:37 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:02 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-07 20:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:03 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-08 16:45 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 17:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 20:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 09:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-09 15:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 18:50 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 10:20 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 18:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 04:09 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 04:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-10 06:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 00:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 21:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-11 07:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 10:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 19:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:02 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-09 06:56 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 18:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 19:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-09 08:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-09 16:14 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 17:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 02:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 08:59 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-09 17:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 06:55 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-10 13:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 16:20 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-11 07:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-11 07:21 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 08:28 -0500
What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-12 06:45 -0500
Re: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-12 07:43 -0600
TL;DR: cry harder! (was: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-12 14:08 -0500
Re: TL;DR: idiot and liar claims "victory"! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-12 22:50 -0600
Climate change mitigations Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 02:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-07 16:10 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 16:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 07:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 08:59 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 15:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 11:27 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 13:05 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 14:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 23:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 13:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 12:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:39 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 20:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:35 +0000
Races, Tribes and other ethnicities Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-15 02:33 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-15 06:30 +0200
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 00:49 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:12 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:53 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:55 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 18:28 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 22:16 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:21 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:05 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:11 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:52 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:49 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 22:51 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:46 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:51 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:51 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:17 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 06:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 09:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 22:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 22:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:04 +0000
Tribes and Ethnicities Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-16 13:30 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-16 20:36 +0200
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 18:50 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 21:15 +0100
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:41 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 16:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:22 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 22:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:25 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 23:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-18 19:39 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-19 18:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-16 08:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-13 05:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 04:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:28 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 20:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:27 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:26 +0000
Biker Gangs Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-14 17:43 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 22:02 +0100
Re: Biker Gangs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 02:11 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:04 +0100
Re: Biker Gangs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:50 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 21:53 +0000
Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-14 17:40 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:57 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 00:29 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 06:27 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 01:51 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:11 +0100
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 23:06 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:56 +0100
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:39 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:31 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:39 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 13:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 14:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 14:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Beavis <beavis@corn.holio> - 2025-01-09 04:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 10:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 11:27 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 11:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 11:51 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 02:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-09 11:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 11:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 12:12 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 19:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 12:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-06 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-08 06:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 02:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 13:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 18:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-08 18:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 13:41 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:23 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:07 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 20:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 20:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-10 23:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 11:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 20:03 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:43 +0000
Business cultures Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 20:32 +0000
Re: Business cultures D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:11 +0100
Re: Business cultures rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:15 +0000
Re: Business cultures rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-09 12:28 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 18:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 19:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 13:55 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 14:13 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 20:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-11 07:23 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:31 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 07:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 03:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 18:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 22:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 21:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 09:30 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-11 07:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 07:53 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 23:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 08:17 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 20:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 13:21 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-13 21:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 17:09 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 14:54 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 04:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 23:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 11:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:10 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-14 20:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-15 23:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-19 20:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-13 08:03 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 18:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 22:51 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 04:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-16 01:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-13 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 07:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 02:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 23:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 06:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 14:23 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 22:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 21:06 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 08:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:18 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 15:56 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:14 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:26 +0000
Traveling and Travel Planning Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 20:10 +0000
Re: Traveling and Travel Planning rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:37 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 19:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-12 19:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 22:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 03:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 22:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-12 22:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:00 +0100
Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 19:59 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:07 +0100
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:31 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:35 +0100
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-12 19:17 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 19:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:35 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 07:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 20:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 20:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 03:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 00:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:10 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 07:55 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 21:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 23:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:42 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:37 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:30 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:14 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 16:00 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:26 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:25 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 22:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-08 23:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:38 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:17 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 22:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:40 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-09 23:03 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 16:03 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 22:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 14:23 -0700
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 19:11 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-11 05:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-11 05:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 18:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 15:55 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 00:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 06:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 02:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 02:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 22:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 06:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 12:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 10:16 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-12 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 18:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 16:24 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 11:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-12 09:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 18:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 16:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 17:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 22:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:51 +0000
(Excessive?) Complexity Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-08 18:57 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:31 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:23 -0500
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:45 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:49 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:39 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:21 -0600
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-09 22:43 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:56 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:50 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:50 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 08:35 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:20 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:02 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:09 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 18:58 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:42 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:43 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 22:49 -0500
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - 2025-02-25 19:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 11:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 19:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 09:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 15:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 11:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 15:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 20:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 11:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-09 17:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:42 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:17 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 12:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-14 00:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:15 -0500
The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:15 +0000
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:47 +0100
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 14:17 +0000
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 21:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 11:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 15:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 03:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 01:15 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-10 07:12 -0500
Diversity - good or bad ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-10 21:17 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 22:45 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-11 01:11 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-11 05:23 +0200
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 00:48 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 07:02 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 09:00 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 19:50 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:19 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:02 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 22:19 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 06:51 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:09 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 20:46 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:48 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 00:43 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:05 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:49 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-01-12 14:06 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:40 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 13:46 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 14:00 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:52 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-12 17:09 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:42 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:51 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:32 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:03 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-14 00:52 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-14 04:13 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:18 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:55 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 21:11 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-14 12:28 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 22:00 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-14 23:15 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:07 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:16 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:18 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:13 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:28 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-16 11:27 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 14:39 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:01 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 11:10 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 23:30 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:57 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 20:59 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:15 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:40 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:40 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:42 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:44 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:41 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:55 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:44 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:41 +0100
Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-18 14:46 +0000
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 15:03 +0000
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 18:07 +0100
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:36 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-12 18:53 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:06 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-13 16:17 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:51 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:23 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:40 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 17:08 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 00:31 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:33 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-12 17:06 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-12 18:53 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:16 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:51 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:48 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-13 16:17 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:24 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:32 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-12 21:47 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 02:41 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-13 03:00 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:47 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:56 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:29 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:24 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:23 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:10 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:53 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:56 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:13 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 09:21 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 14:58 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:36 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:30 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 04:32 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 12:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:42 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:38 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:11 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:04 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 19:52 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:21 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:23 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:00 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 06:59 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:46 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 20:54 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:44 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 22:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-11 21:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:33 +0000
The Joys of Motorola Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:40 +0000
Re: The Joys of Motorola rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 00:19 +0000
Re: The Joys of Motorola "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 03:56 -0500
Re: The Joys of Motorola rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 07:05 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 00:21 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 03:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-14 03:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-14 03:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-05 18:01 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-04 15:51 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 12:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-05 16:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 17:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-05 23:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-06 02:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 12:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 19:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-06 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 20:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 04:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-08 00:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 11:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-07 23:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:24 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 20:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 02:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 07:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:32 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 18:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 16:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-07 22:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 00:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-07 18:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 14:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 21:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 16:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 05:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:28 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 01:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 23:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 10:12 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:26 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-06 12:28 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 05:36 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-03 19:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-03 19:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 21:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 02:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 00:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 20:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:36 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 12:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:30 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 12:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 02:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:52 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-07 13:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 18:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-08 18:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:55 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 06:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 02:24 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 19:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:05 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 22:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 23:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 19:20 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 20:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 02:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 09:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 00:06 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 01:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-05 03:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-01 17:31 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 08:21 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 21:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 23:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 01:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-02 01:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-02 02:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-02 04:05 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:27 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-02 10:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-03 01:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 08:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:32 +0100
Page 32 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 30 31 [32] 33 34 … 50 Next page →
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 18:50 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m148qvFee9pU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65453 |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:25:17 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > I think the 86 series had 'more future possibilities' > than the 8085. There were too many 8-bit systems out there already, > so bumping up to 16 bit was smart for sales. Why make/compete-with > "just another TRS-80" ? 16/32 bit processors were in the air so it would make no sense to stay with 8 bits. https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-inside-story-of-texas-instruments-biggest- blunder-the-tms9900-microprocessor That covers the ground from a slightly different perspective, a TI engineer. It's interesting to speculate on IBM's view of future possibilities. A large part of the company didn't think there was a future. Intel thought the 432 was the future but that fell on its face. Using the 8088 solved the peripherals problem but it also meant the performance wasn't better than a Z80. Z80 designs were already doing bank switching. The 8088 just had the additional registers to implement it. The TMS9900 wasn't a bad chip, if a little odd if you came from the Intel/ Zilog world. I worked with it on one project. Because of TI's roots they had a rad hard version https://retrocomputingforum.com/t/the-texas-instruments-tms-9900- microprocessor/1370 That's a good description of the oddities. The first article points out the IBM was big-endian and suddenly thy were transported into the little-endian world. Our legacy software uses ONC-RPC which handle the byte order. Originally the system ran on RS6000 machines where the reshuffling was a NOOP. As we started using Linux in house for development, the x86 machines had to reverse the canonical big-endian data. No problem. Then our clients moved to Windows while we still used Linux leading to the absurdity of dual processing to move little-endian to big-endian and back to little-endian. All that is hidden in the RPC code but it becomes explicit when you find yourself using htonl, ntohl, and friends when building a socket connection.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 16:24 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <aM-cnUGqaKoIjDD6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65456 |
On 2/12/25 1:50 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 12:25:17 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> I think the 86 series had 'more future possibilities' >> than the 8085. There were too many 8-bit systems out there already, >> so bumping up to 16 bit was smart for sales. Why make/compete-with >> "just another TRS-80" ? > > 16/32 bit processors were in the air so it would make no sense to stay > with 8 bits. > > https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-inside-story-of-texas-instruments-biggest- > blunder-the-tms9900-microprocessor > > That covers the ground from a slightly different perspective, a TI > engineer. It's interesting to speculate on IBM's view of future > possibilities. A large part of the company didn't think there was a > future. Intel thought the 432 was the future but that fell on its face. > Using the 8088 solved the peripherals problem but it also meant the > performance wasn't better than a Z80. Z80 designs were already doing bank > switching. The 8088 just had the additional registers to implement it. > > The TMS9900 wasn't a bad chip, if a little odd if you came from the Intel/ > Zilog world. I worked with it on one project. Because of TI's roots they > had a rad hard version > > https://retrocomputingforum.com/t/the-texas-instruments-tms-9900- > microprocessor/1370 > > That's a good description of the oddities. I did a little ASM for the 9900. It *was* a bit 'odd' however. Register-sets-in-RAM was unique, but it facilitated multi-user. Everybody remembers the PC, but the real intended use of the chip was in the 990 mini-computer, where multi-user/tasking was a must. Actual hardware support for that, weird. Branch and Load Workspace Pointer ....... Anyway, TI flubbed it and another early 16-bitter went down the toilet. There were a LOT of 'concept chips' back around the same time when 16+ bits was becoming real. Everyone was sure they had the Better Idea. Now, you might maybe find one in a surplus parts bin. (had a dream once about finding a TMS9900 - white with gold pins - in a surplus bin) > The first article points out the IBM was big-endian and suddenly thy were > transported into the little-endian world. Our legacy software uses ONC-RPC > which handle the byte order. Originally the system ran on RS6000 machines > where the reshuffling was a NOOP. As we started using Linux in house for > development, the x86 machines had to reverse the canonical big-endian > data. No problem. Then our clients moved to Windows while we still used > Linux leading to the absurdity of dual processing to move little-endian to > big-endian and back to little-endian. > > All that is hidden in the RPC code but it becomes explicit when you find > yourself using htonl, ntohl, and friends when building a socket > connection. There were some dual-chip jobbbies, bet-hedging. One TRS-80 could be had with a 68k board that ran CP/M-68k and as I recall the C128 had both a 65xx upgrade plus a Z80 that'd run CP/M. Dealing with big/small-endian ... that could get a bit confusing jumping back and forth between platforms. Made some boards with both a Rabbit and PIC on them and would find myself typing PIC instructions into the bunny and vice-versa sometimes :-)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-13 07:35 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m15lm5Flg2rU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65466 |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:24:40 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > There were some dual-chip jobbbies, bet-hedging. > One TRS-80 could be had with a 68k board that ran CP/M-68k and as I > recall the C128 had both a 65xx upgrade plus a Z80 that'd run CP/M. Remember the SoftCard? iirc in its native state the Apple II keyboard lacked something essential for C programming. Curly braces?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-13 11:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vokkls$2sj30$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65483 |
On 13/02/2025 07:35, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:24:40 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> There were some dual-chip jobbbies, bet-hedging. >> One TRS-80 could be had with a 68k board that ran CP/M-68k and as I >> recall the C128 had both a 65xx upgrade plus a Z80 that'd run CP/M. > > Remember the SoftCard? iirc in its native state the Apple II keyboard > lacked something essential for C programming. Curly braces? Amongst other things, yes. It was alarmingly limited -- In todays liberal progressive conflict-free education system, everyone gets full Marx.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 09:08 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <DX1rP.674443$iNI.499904@fx14.iad> |
| In reply to | #65439 |
On 2025-02-11 9:49 p.m., rbowman wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 20:43:33 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >> DOS turned out to be easier to deal with, so it won. >> Bill Gates also won because his lawyers sneaked-in a small-print item >> requiring IBM to always include his latest system along with their >> PCs - and the IBM lawyers MISSED it. > > There were a few other things going on like a suit against IBM by Digital > Research. DR won so IBM had to offer CP/M-86 but it was priced much higher > than DOS. > > CP/M-68K would have been interesting but there weren't too many platforms. > Lisa was a flop and the original Mac wasn't that great. Other than high > end systems that left Atari and Commodore, both of which had sort of a > non-serious reputation. Lisa was a flop because it didn't make any kind of sense to ask people to spend as much on a computer than they would on a car. It was a very capable machine, and it was nice to discover that the Lisa went on to be refurbished as popular Macs in certain areas of the United States, but you can't ask people to spend as much as they were asking. As for the Mac 128K, I admit that if I were buying a computer in 1984, I would have wanted one. Of course, I would probably very quickly buy a hard disk and a RAM upgrade for it. If I were buying in 1985 though, I'm certain that I would have opted for either an Atari or an Amiga though... probably the Amiga if I had witnessed their impressive tech demo. It wouldn't have mattered to me, as a teacher, if it didn't have a serious reputation or not. < snip > -- CrudeSausage/ Gab: @CrudeSausage Telegram: @CrudeSausage Pfizer knowingly injected us with poison
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 18:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m149b6Fee9pU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65451 |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:08:35 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > Lisa was a flop because it didn't make any kind of sense to ask people > to spend as much on a computer than they would on a car. It was a very > capable machine, and it was nice to discover that the Lisa went on to be > refurbished as popular Macs in certain areas of the United States, but > you can't ask people to spend as much as they were asking. As for the > Mac 128K, I admit that if I were buying a computer in 1984, I would have > wanted one. Of course, I would probably very quickly buy a hard disk and > a RAM upgrade for it. If I were buying in 1985 though, I'm certain that > I would have opted for either an Atari or an Amiga though... probably > the Amiga if I had witnessed their impressive tech demo. It wouldn't > have mattered to me, as a teacher, if it didn't have a serious > reputation or not. The original Mac toasters had one unique feature -- they met the TEMPEST requirements of the day. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_(codename) PCs leaked like a sieve. Most still do. Back in the toaster's day cybersecurity was worrying about Boris and Natasha squatting out in the bushes with their radio gear.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 16:56 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <r2ydnQZz4eBqhTD6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65457 |
On 2/12/25 1:58 PM, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:08:35 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Lisa was a flop because it didn't make any kind of sense to ask people >> to spend as much on a computer than they would on a car. It was a very >> capable machine, and it was nice to discover that the Lisa went on to be >> refurbished as popular Macs in certain areas of the United States, but >> you can't ask people to spend as much as they were asking. As for the >> Mac 128K, I admit that if I were buying a computer in 1984, I would have >> wanted one. Of course, I would probably very quickly buy a hard disk and >> a RAM upgrade for it. If I were buying in 1985 though, I'm certain that >> I would have opted for either an Atari or an Amiga though... probably >> the Amiga if I had witnessed their impressive tech demo. It wouldn't >> have mattered to me, as a teacher, if it didn't have a serious >> reputation or not. > > The original Mac toasters had one unique feature -- they met the TEMPEST > requirements of the day. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_(codename) > > PCs leaked like a sieve. Most still do. Back in the toaster's day > cybersecurity was worrying about Boris and Natasha squatting out in the > bushes with their radio gear. Well - they DID sometimes ! Worth looking into, it's amazing how much can be gleaned from random signals not only from cpus but from keyboards and mice and printers. Even delays in hitting keystrokes can be mapped against the querty layout and, with enough, samples .... Far more efficient these days to just phish a VP and they'll send you both passwords AND all the data files (then blame it on the secretary). Hmmm ... was reading a security article a few years ago and the author provided an example link to one of those companies that monitor *everything*. It was a LIVE login though, and backtracking a few steps I could see the latest stuff - including an HP office printer in the UK. Was able to access it, see the last few docs in the reprint buffer and, for fun, made it print a test page. THAT'S insecurity.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-13 07:22 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m15kt9Flg2rU2@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65469 |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:56:06 -0500, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 2/12/25 1:58 PM, rbowman wrote: >> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:08:35 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Lisa was a flop because it didn't make any kind of sense to ask people >>> to spend as much on a computer than they would on a car. It was a very >>> capable machine, and it was nice to discover that the Lisa went on to >>> be refurbished as popular Macs in certain areas of the United States, >>> but you can't ask people to spend as much as they were asking. As for >>> the Mac 128K, I admit that if I were buying a computer in 1984, I >>> would have wanted one. Of course, I would probably very quickly buy a >>> hard disk and a RAM upgrade for it. If I were buying in 1985 though, >>> I'm certain that I would have opted for either an Atari or an Amiga >>> though... probably the Amiga if I had witnessed their impressive tech >>> demo. It wouldn't have mattered to me, as a teacher, if it didn't have >>> a serious reputation or not. >> >> The original Mac toasters had one unique feature -- they met the >> TEMPEST requirements of the day. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tempest_(codename) >> >> PCs leaked like a sieve. Most still do. Back in the toaster's day >> cybersecurity was worrying about Boris and Natasha squatting out in the >> bushes with their radio gear. > > > Well - they DID sometimes ! That was the ironic part. During the same period when we worried about Russkies in the bushes, spies sorting through the dumpsters, and were paranoid enough to remove all printer ribbons when an IBM CE was coming, they discovered Walker and his band of merry men. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Anthony_Walker DISCO (Defense Industrial Security Clearance Office, not the lousy music) soiled themselves and immediately stopped issuing security clearances.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvqq03h.38buj.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #65377 |
WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote at 23:31 this Monday (GMT): > On 2/10/25 1:40 PM, candycanearter07 wrote: >> D <nospam@example.net> wrote at 21:19 this Saturday (GMT): >> [snip] >>> My most powerful software was a multi-path checker to a storage system >>> that held a lot of pension money. >>> >>> It was written in bash. =D >>> >>> Ok, ok... I wrote a GUI for some kind of batch job mgmt software that IBM >>> hobbled together in order to trace dependencies, that was done in python. >> [snip] >> >> >> Did you use something like tkinter? > > TKinter works. Not ultra-elegant but functional. > > I've used it for several projects with pop-up > windows and touch-screens and such. Did find that > you get less grief if you don't CLOSE those windows > but just send 'em off to negative screen coords. > Then on signal from a touch-screen or timer or > whatever you just drag 'em back into view and > make whatever updates. > > TK is also pretty well documented since it's been > around for awhile. Actually none of the graphics > toolkits are particularly 'elegant' or great joys > to use so go with what seems easiest for the job. > > Mostly if I need something with a quickie GUI then > I use Lazarus/FPC when possible. The WYSIWYG form > builder with a zillion possible options is WAY nicer > than the line-at-a-time TK approach plus Pascal looks > much nicer than Python or 'C'. I would still probably use TK for a really quick GUI, but I prefer terminal ui's nowadays. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-12 17:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <JNacnbpvEIJegDD6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65462 |
On 2/12/25 3:20 PM, candycanearter07 wrote: > WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote at 23:31 this Monday (GMT): >> On 2/10/25 1:40 PM, candycanearter07 wrote: >>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote at 21:19 this Saturday (GMT): >>> [snip] >>>> My most powerful software was a multi-path checker to a storage system >>>> that held a lot of pension money. >>>> >>>> It was written in bash. =D >>>> >>>> Ok, ok... I wrote a GUI for some kind of batch job mgmt software that IBM >>>> hobbled together in order to trace dependencies, that was done in python. >>> [snip] >>> >>> >>> Did you use something like tkinter? >> >> TKinter works. Not ultra-elegant but functional. >> >> I've used it for several projects with pop-up >> windows and touch-screens and such. Did find that >> you get less grief if you don't CLOSE those windows >> but just send 'em off to negative screen coords. >> Then on signal from a touch-screen or timer or >> whatever you just drag 'em back into view and >> make whatever updates. >> >> TK is also pretty well documented since it's been >> around for awhile. Actually none of the graphics >> toolkits are particularly 'elegant' or great joys >> to use so go with what seems easiest for the job. >> >> Mostly if I need something with a quickie GUI then >> I use Lazarus/FPC when possible. The WYSIWYG form >> builder with a zillion possible options is WAY nicer >> than the line-at-a-time TK approach plus Pascal looks >> much nicer than Python or 'C'. > > > I would still probably use TK for a really quick GUI, but I prefer > terminal ui's nowadays. You can do good stuff with TUIs these days, no question. However if your app is graphics-heavy or very mousey/ touchscreeny then TK or friends are likely better. One size doesn't fit all. Lazarus lets you whip up a GUI fast, and there are a zillion settings/hooks for each screen element you can tweak as needed. Pascal is not as popular as it once was, but it's a good and very complete lang and, IMHO, worth being familiar with.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-14 05:00 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <slrnvqtjd5.2up9n.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> |
| In reply to | #65475 |
WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote at 22:16 this Wednesday (GMT): > On 2/12/25 3:20 PM, candycanearter07 wrote: >> WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote at 23:31 this Monday (GMT): >>> On 2/10/25 1:40 PM, candycanearter07 wrote: >>>> D <nospam@example.net> wrote at 21:19 this Saturday (GMT): >>>> [snip] >>>>> My most powerful software was a multi-path checker to a storage system >>>>> that held a lot of pension money. >>>>> >>>>> It was written in bash. =D >>>>> >>>>> Ok, ok... I wrote a GUI for some kind of batch job mgmt software that IBM >>>>> hobbled together in order to trace dependencies, that was done in python. >>>> [snip] >>>> >>>> >>>> Did you use something like tkinter? >>> >>> TKinter works. Not ultra-elegant but functional. >>> >>> I've used it for several projects with pop-up >>> windows and touch-screens and such. Did find that >>> you get less grief if you don't CLOSE those windows >>> but just send 'em off to negative screen coords. >>> Then on signal from a touch-screen or timer or >>> whatever you just drag 'em back into view and >>> make whatever updates. >>> >>> TK is also pretty well documented since it's been >>> around for awhile. Actually none of the graphics >>> toolkits are particularly 'elegant' or great joys >>> to use so go with what seems easiest for the job. >>> >>> Mostly if I need something with a quickie GUI then >>> I use Lazarus/FPC when possible. The WYSIWYG form >>> builder with a zillion possible options is WAY nicer >>> than the line-at-a-time TK approach plus Pascal looks >>> much nicer than Python or 'C'. >> >> >> I would still probably use TK for a really quick GUI, but I prefer >> terminal ui's nowadays. > > You can do good stuff with TUIs these days, no question. > However if your app is graphics-heavy or very mousey/ > touchscreeny then TK or friends are likely better. > > One size doesn't fit all. > > Lazarus lets you whip up a GUI fast, and there are > a zillion settings/hooks for each screen element you > can tweak as needed. Pascal is not as popular as it > once was, but it's a good and very complete lang and, > IMHO, worth being familiar with. Fair enough, I just don't usually make stuff that NEEDS a good GUI very often. I'll keep Lazarus in mind, though. -- user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 22:44 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <eBOdnWTTnqoxuTX6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65274 |
On 2/8/25 2:27 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 08/02/2025 17:59, D wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> >>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>> or even professional, user. >>> >>> In my careers - I have had several - us Engineers were humble >>> creatures who wrote clean workmanlike well documented and tested code >>> in the hope that no one would ever have to write it again, and if >>> they did, it would be instantly understandable. Code was. to quote my >>> friend 'Higgy', 'all just bits, in silicon'. >>> >>> Later I encountered computer scientists who spoke a strange language >>> with artistic terms in it like 'elegance' 'intellectual purity' >>> 'algorithmic efficiency' 'Turing complete' 'object oriented' and >>> other words that seemed to have nothing whatever to do with actually >>> writing testing and debugging clean code that met the spec and worked >>> in a timescale less than eternity... >>> >>> I decided they were all frustrated ArtStudents™ with Physics envy who >>> could not do HardSums™ >> >> Haha, brilliant! >> >>> And should never be let anywhere near a critical project. >> >> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there >> can be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy >> in his room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >> >> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best >> documented way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without >> the official training is able to do it. >> >> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >> theory part however, they were always the A students. > > There is computer science, and there is software engineering. > Textbooks on software engineering are worth reading "Computer science" can be interesting - although not very accessible to those with sub-Turing IQ. But "software engineering" is really Where It's At.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 20:51 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vob4hd$q903$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65287 |
On 09/02/2025 03:44, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 2/8/25 2:27 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 08/02/2025 17:59, D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>>> or even professional, user. >>>> >>>> In my careers - I have had several - us Engineers were humble >>>> creatures who wrote clean workmanlike well documented and tested >>>> code in the hope that no one would ever have to write it again, and >>>> if they did, it would be instantly understandable. Code was. to >>>> quote my friend 'Higgy', 'all just bits, in silicon'. >>>> >>>> Later I encountered computer scientists who spoke a strange language >>>> with artistic terms in it like 'elegance' 'intellectual purity' >>>> 'algorithmic efficiency' 'Turing complete' 'object oriented' and >>>> other words that seemed to have nothing whatever to do with actually >>>> writing testing and debugging clean code that met the spec and >>>> worked in a timescale less than eternity... >>>> >>>> I decided they were all frustrated ArtStudents™ with Physics envy >>>> who could not do HardSums™ >>> >>> Haha, brilliant! >>> >>>> And should never be let anywhere near a critical project. >>> >>> I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there >>> can be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy >>> in his room who just pounded out the code and got the work done. >>> >>> I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best >>> documented way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy >>> without the official training is able to do it. >>> >>> Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A >>> students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the >>> theory part however, they were always the A students. >> >> There is computer science, and there is software engineering. >> Textbooks on software engineering are worth reading > > "Computer science" can be interesting - although > not very accessible to those with sub-Turing IQ. > > But "software engineering" is really Where It's At. > > > It depends. Academics are interested in theory. Practical people learn just enough to get the job done that they want to do. "An engineer is someone who can do for five bob what any damned fool can do for a quid" (and an American for $300...:-)) -- I was brought up to believe that you should never give offence if you can avoid it; the new culture tells us you should always take offence if you can. There are now experts in the art of taking offence, indeed whole academic subjects, such as 'gender studies', devoted to it. Sir Roger Scruton
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 18:57 +0000 |
| Subject | (Excessive?) Complexity |
| Message-ID | <slrnvqfa8s.27rvm.lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> |
| In reply to | #65268 |
On 2025-02-08, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote: > Anyway, of late, software "improvements" have > too often been the exact opposite. What alien > universe do these 'improvers' COME from ??? > > IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from > people looking for something to do. Their > idea of "better" means "better for ME - and > screw YOU". It's not better for the average, > or even professional, user. > > Maybe we need a new branch ... Linux-2004 ... > with all the good stuff and none of these > "improvements" ??? Linux and related was > damned good from the start, SOLID by 2004. > > It worked. It was kinda simple. You COULD > figure it out without committing suicide. > NOW, it just seems to be becoming an > incomprehensible ever-mutating MESS - Winders > by another name. Much of the complexity that you do not approve of, seems to me to be related to Linux's ambition to produce code that works on everything from an embedded IoT device to a high-performance laptop to a clustered datacenter rack from a single set of source files. Back "in the Golden Age", the spectrum of systems that the code was expected to support was much narrower; that would tend to make the code much simpler and more readable.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 19:31 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: (Excessive?) Complexity |
| Message-ID | <vo8bem$69pr$4@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65273 |
On 08/02/2025 18:57, Lars Poulsen wrote: > On 2025-02-08, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote: >> Anyway, of late, software "improvements" have >> too often been the exact opposite. What alien >> universe do these 'improvers' COME from ??? >> >> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >> people looking for something to do. Their >> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >> or even professional, user. >> >> Maybe we need a new branch ... Linux-2004 ... >> with all the good stuff and none of these >> "improvements" ??? Linux and related was >> damned good from the start, SOLID by 2004. >> >> It worked. It was kinda simple. You COULD >> figure it out without committing suicide. >> NOW, it just seems to be becoming an >> incomprehensible ever-mutating MESS - Winders >> by another name. > > Much of the complexity that you do not approve of, seems to me to be > related to Linux's ambition to produce code that works on everything > from an embedded IoT device to a high-performance laptop to a clustered > datacenter rack from a single set of source files. > > Back "in the Golden Age", the spectrum of systems that the code was > expected to support was much narrower; that would tend to make the code > much simpler and more readable. Nah. Its the stupidity not of using an oriented *approach* to design code, but of putting it into the frickin language and making everyone use it. -- “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the urge to rule it.” – H. L. Mencken
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-08 23:23 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: (Excessive?) Complexity |
| Message-ID | <eSadna_s0t5TsDX6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #65276 |
On 2/8/25 2:31 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 08/02/2025 18:57, Lars Poulsen wrote: >> On 2025-02-08, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote: >>> Anyway, of late, software "improvements" have >>> too often been the exact opposite. What alien >>> universe do these 'improvers' COME from ??? >>> >>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>> people looking for something to do. Their >>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>> or even professional, user. >>> >>> Maybe we need a new branch ... Linux-2004 ... >>> with all the good stuff and none of these >>> "improvements" ??? Linux and related was >>> damned good from the start, SOLID by 2004. >>> >>> It worked. It was kinda simple. You COULD >>> figure it out without committing suicide. >>> NOW, it just seems to be becoming an >>> incomprehensible ever-mutating MESS - Winders >>> by another name. >> >> Much of the complexity that you do not approve of, seems to me to be >> related to Linux's ambition to produce code that works on everything >> from an embedded IoT device to a high-performance laptop to a clustered >> datacenter rack from a single set of source files. >> >> Back "in the Golden Age", the spectrum of systems that the code was >> expected to support was much narrower; that would tend to make the code >> much simpler and more readable. > > Nah. Its the stupidity not of using an oriented *approach* to design > code, but of putting it into the frickin language and making everyone > use it. Well, I kind-of understand his issue. The problem these days is SO-MANY-PLATFORMS. Developers, and esp their pointy-haired bosses, want a one-fits-all application. Alas this results in INSANE, un-debuggable, complexity. Aiming for more narrow platforms is probably the better way. The 90% required/functional code can be preserved, but all the crap required to suit *a* platform can be largely unique. Seems less-efficient, but is more solid. But who cares about 'solid' these days ? Make something arty and flashy, get the users cash - then ignore all their complaints. It's a Business Model ..... Remember the "bad old days" when we had Atari, Apple, Commodore, Tandy, TRS-80, ROM systems, CP/M, DOS ? It was just not feasible to write an "everything" application. A lot had to be customized to the particular platform. This made for a number of smaller, tuned, applications which WERE debuggable and comprehensible. Today really isn't SO different, but tends to be disguised - resulting in bloatware.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 11:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: (Excessive?) Complexity |
| Message-ID | <9bdfe478-279e-464c-62b6-dc3b1f5da4ab@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65290 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 2/8/25 2:31 PM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 08/02/2025 18:57, Lars Poulsen wrote: >>> On 2025-02-08, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> wrote: >>>> Anyway, of late, software "improvements" have >>>> too often been the exact opposite. What alien >>>> universe do these 'improvers' COME from ??? >>>> >>>> IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from >>>> people looking for something to do. Their >>>> idea of "better" means "better for ME - and >>>> screw YOU". It's not better for the average, >>>> or even professional, user. >>>> >>>> Maybe we need a new branch ... Linux-2004 ... >>>> with all the good stuff and none of these >>>> "improvements" ??? Linux and related was >>>> damned good from the start, SOLID by 2004. >>>> >>>> It worked. It was kinda simple. You COULD >>>> figure it out without committing suicide. >>>> NOW, it just seems to be becoming an >>>> incomprehensible ever-mutating MESS - Winders >>>> by another name. >>> >>> Much of the complexity that you do not approve of, seems to me to be >>> related to Linux's ambition to produce code that works on everything >>> from an embedded IoT device to a high-performance laptop to a clustered >>> datacenter rack from a single set of source files. >>> >>> Back "in the Golden Age", the spectrum of systems that the code was >>> expected to support was much narrower; that would tend to make the code >>> much simpler and more readable. >> >> Nah. Its the stupidity not of using an oriented *approach* to design code, >> but of putting it into the frickin language and making everyone use it. > > Well, I kind-of understand his issue. The problem these > days is SO-MANY-PLATFORMS. Developers, and esp their > pointy-haired bosses, want a one-fits-all application. > Alas this results in INSANE, un-debuggable, complexity. > > Aiming for more narrow platforms is probably the better > way. The 90% required/functional code can be preserved, > but all the crap required to suit *a* platform can be > largely unique. Seems less-efficient, but is more solid. > > But who cares about 'solid' these days ? Make something > arty and flashy, get the users cash - then ignore all > their complaints. It's a Business Model ..... This is the truth! One of the wins we had when replacing a customers Azure was the realization that they had no need for fancy fail-over, active/active solution or even a DR-site, given the workload they are running. That meant we could design our environment to be dead simple and avoid a lot of complexity and keep the cost low. And here the customer had paid for many years for lots of "extras" from M$ and once had a crypto miner visiting, racking up a bill of 50k EUR over an weekend. Simple is good! I struggle often to explain to young whipper snappers the power of good enough. The power of good enough has won me a lot of business throughout the years. > Remember the "bad old days" when we had Atari, Apple, > Commodore, Tandy, TRS-80, ROM systems, CP/M, DOS ? > It was just not feasible to write an "everything" > application. A lot had to be customized to the > particular platform. This made for a number of > smaller, tuned, applications which WERE debuggable > and comprehensible. Today really isn't SO different, > but tends to be disguised - resulting in bloatware. >
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 19:49 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: (Excessive?) Complexity |
| Message-ID | <m0sf5nF734tU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #65299 |
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:45:42 +0100, D wrote: > Simple is good! I struggle often to explain to young whipper snappers > the power of good enough. The power of good enough has won me a lot of > business throughout the years. I've worked with a couple of programmers who tried to anticipate future needs and developed complex code to handle those eventualities. 20 years later the eventualities never happened but the complexity is still there. It's one thing to anticipate future needs in your design and not to paint yourself into a corner and another to spend a lot of time doing stuff before it's necessary. Good enough is good enough.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-09 22:39 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: (Excessive?) Complexity |
| Message-ID | <a1cb4c31-08fc-de23-44db-aa0115490e75@example.net> |
| In reply to | #65311 |
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:45:42 +0100, D wrote: > >> Simple is good! I struggle often to explain to young whipper snappers >> the power of good enough. The power of good enough has won me a lot of >> business throughout the years. > > I've worked with a couple of programmers who tried to anticipate future > needs and developed complex code to handle those eventualities. 20 years > later the eventualities never happened but the complexity is still there. > > It's one thing to anticipate future needs in your design and not to paint > yourself into a corner and another to spend a lot of time doing stuff > before it's necessary. Good enough is good enough. > This is the truth!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-02-11 13:21 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: (Excessive?) Complexity |
| Message-ID | <vog809$1t95m$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #65323 |
On 2/9/25 3:39 PM, D wrote: > > > On Sun, 9 Feb 2025, rbowman wrote: > >> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 11:45:42 +0100, D wrote: >> >>> Simple is good! I struggle often to explain to young whipper snappers >>> the power of good enough. The power of good enough has won me a lot of >>> business throughout the years. >> >> I've worked with a couple of programmers who tried to anticipate future >> needs and developed complex code to handle those eventualities. 20 years >> later the eventualities never happened but the complexity is still there. >> >> It's one thing to anticipate future needs in your design and not to paint >> yourself into a corner and another to spend a lot of time doing stuff >> before it's necessary. Good enough is good enough. >> > > This is the truth! You need to begin using "Dis" for "This". "DFS" would do too.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 32 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 30 31 [32] 33 34 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web